<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Dear Colleagues,<br>
<br>
I have reviewed the document, and confirm that it is certainly going
to be a cornerstone of our work. <br>
<br>
With my CEO hat on, I realized we were not explicitly mentioning any
accountability mechanisms regarding the achievement of strategic
goals, or delivering certain key projects on time, or within budget.
<br>
<br>
Is it because we just forgot them ? If that is the case, I think it
would be valuable to add this kind of accountability mechanism in
our overview of the current situation at Icann. I have a feeling
that we have naturally been inclined to overlook this kind of
"management" accountability mechanisms. <br>
<br>
To give more examples, within Afnic, the CEO is accountable to the
Board to achieve certain goals of the strategic plan. And the Board
can dismiss the CEO in case performance is not appropriate. The CEO
can delegate some of these goals to staff and has the same kind of
power (although under more constraints) regarding staff. <br>
<br>
And of course, Board members come up for re-election on a regular
basis. So if the Board is felt to be not performing correctly, the
general assembly can change Board members. <br>
<br>
Best<br>
Mathieu<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 24/12/2014 00:09, Samantha Eisner a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:D0BF35C7.1DD62%25samantha.eisner@icann.org"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div>Dear Kavouss, </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The document is on the WG1 draft page at: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Work+Area+1+-+Draft+Documents">https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Work+Area+1+-+Draft+Documents</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The link to the document in WORD format: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/51414329/WS1%20-%20Accountability%20Inventory%20with%20Questions.doc?version=1&modificationDate=1419299658000&api=v2">https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/51414329/WS1%20-%20Accountability%20Inventory%20with%20Questions.doc?version=1&modificationDate=1419299658000&api=v2</a> and
PDF: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/51414329/WS1%20-%20Accountability%20Inventory%20with%20Questions.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1419299650000&api=v2">https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/51414329/WS1%20-%20Accountability%20Inventory%20with%20Questions.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1419299650000&api=v2</a> </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best, </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Samantha</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt;
text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none;
BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT:
0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid;
BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Kavouss Arasteh
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Tuesday, December
23, 2014 at 2:51 PM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Roelof Meijer <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl">Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>Mathieu Weill <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>>,
Samantha Eisner <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:samantha.eisner@icann.org">samantha.eisner@icann.org</a>>,
"David W. Maher" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:dmaher@pir.org">dmaher@pir.org</a>>, "<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ccwg-accountability1@icann.org">ccwg-accountability1@icann.org</a>"
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ccwg-accountability1@icann.org">ccwg-accountability1@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [Area 1]
Sub Group 1 - Preliminary Draft<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Dear Samantha</div>
<div>Tks for information.</div>
<div>I could not find your doc. on the wiki WG1</div>
<div>May you pls either direct me to the area that I could
find that last doc. or send me the doc.</div>
<div>Regards</div>
<div>Kavouss </div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2014-12-23 15:19 GMT+01:00 Roelof
Meijer <span dir="ltr">
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl" target="_blank">Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Dear all,<br>
<br>
As discussed, I suggest the table to be expanded with
at least one column<br>
„final say” or „stops the buck” or something, that
states where the final<br>
decision lies.<br>
I bet that in most cases we will find that this is the
ICANN Board. Which<br>
is not a flaw in the system, but -as I am sure you are
all aware- just the<br>
logic result of the present (common) governance
structure of the<br>
corporation, whereby board members have a fiduciary
duty and ultimately<br>
(only) serve the best interests of the corporation.<br>
<br>
As long as the best interests of ICANN the corporation
and the „public<br>
interest” are aligned (or are so in the opinion of the
board) all is<br>
probably well. If they are not, if the are not in the
opinion of the<br>
board, or if the board misinterprets the public
interests and/or the<br>
corporations interests, problems arise.<br>
<br>
It surely has not always been the case, but in my
opinion the board and<br>
CEO have done pretty well over the last years in
finding the right balance<br>
(or alignment) between corporate and public/community
interests.<br>
No guarantee that that will remain the case
indefinitely however,<br>
especially if there’s no longer the NTIA/USG to subtly
threaten with<br>
corrective measures...<br>
<br>
As far as I understand it, we mean by „enhanced
accountability” that<br>
ultimately, when the *stuff* hits the fan, the public
interest will be<br>
the decisive interest and NOT the corporation's.<br>
<br>
I do not think that can be demanded from the board.<br>
I agree that we should consider multiple solutions to
this challenge.<br>
One of which might be assigning the task and the
authority required for<br>
it, to an external or semi-external structure, through
the bylaws of that<br>
corporation. In such a situation, the members of that
structure should<br>
obviously not be appointed by (the board of) the
corporation. But by those<br>
representing the public interest.<br>
<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Roelof Meijer<br>
<br>
<br>
SIDN<br>
| Meander 501 | 6825 MD | P.O. Box 5022 | 6802 EA |
ARNHEM | THE<br>
NETHERLANDS<br>
T <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B31%20%280%2926%20352%2055%2000"
value="+31263525500">+31 (0)26 352 55 00</a> | M
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B31%20%280%296%2011%20395%20775"
value="+31611395775">+31 (0)6 11 395 775</a> | F
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B31%20%280%2926%20352%2055%2005"
value="+31263525505">+31 (0)26 352 55 05</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:roelof.meijer@sidn.nl">roelof.meijer@sidn.nl</a><br>
| <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.sidn.nl"
target="_blank">www.sidn.nl</a> <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.sidn.nl/"
target="_blank">http://www.sidn.nl/</a>><br>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 23-12-14 06:18, "Mathieu Weill" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
>Thanks Samantha,<br>
><br>
>Just adding a link to the resource for
everyone to access easily :<br>
>DOC version :<br>
><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/51414329/WS1%20-%20Accoun"
target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/51414329/WS1%20-%20Accoun</a><br>
>tability%20Inventory%20with%20Questions.doc?version=1&modificationDate=141<br>
><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:9299658000" value="+19299658000">9299658000</a>&api=v2<br>
><br>
>PDF version :<br>
><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/51414329/WS1%20-%20Accoun"
target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/51414329/WS1%20-%20Accoun</a><br>
>tability%20Inventory%20with%20Questions.doc?version=1&modificationDate=141<br>
><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:9299658000" value="+19299658000">9299658000</a>&api=v2<br>
><br>
><br>
>Mathieu<br>
><br>
>Le 23/12/2014 02:57, Samantha Eisner a écrit :<br>
>> Hi -<br>
>><br>
>> I’ve done a first attempt (which is by no
means comprehensive) of our<br>
>> assigned task and uploaded to the wiki.
I think we’d benefit from<br>
>>seeing<br>
>> what other detail we’d like in there, so
I put this out to start the<br>
>> conversation.<br>
>><br>
>> Best,<br>
>><br>
>> Sam<br>
>><br>
>> On 12/16/14, 1:43 PM, "David W. Maher"
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:dmaher@pir.org">dmaher@pir.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> I agree<br>
>>> David<br>
>>> David W. Maher<br>
>>> Senior Vice President – Law &
Policy<br>
>>> Public Interest Registry<br>
>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:312%20375%204849" value="+13123754849">312
375 4849</a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> On 12/16/14 2:04 PM, "Mathieu Weill"
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>>
wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>>> Samantha, Colleagues,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> That is indeed what I understand
from the discussion. You could also<br>
>>>>add<br>
>>>> a 3) is it review, redress or
check & balance (see Netmundial<br>
>>>>definition<br>
>>>> of Accountability).<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Best<br>
>>>> Mathieu<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Le 16/12/2014 13:04, Samantha
Eisner a écrit :<br>
>>>>> Colleagues,<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Listening to the discussion,
I propose think that one of the new<br>
>>>>> refined<br>
>>>>> tasks that we could undertake
would be, for each mechanism that we’ve<br>
>>>>> identified on the inventory,
first try to answer the questions of:<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> 1) To whom does this
mechanism seek to make ICANN accountable; and<br>
>>>>> 2) For what<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> This could be a starting
point for parsing through the next wave of<br>
>>>>> issues<br>
>>>>> that we are agreeing to take
on.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Best,<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Sam<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> On 12/15/14, 9:23 AM, "David
W. Maher" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:dmaher@pir.org">dmaher@pir.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Thanks, Samantha.<br>
>>>>>> On the subject of
contractual sources of accountability, it should<br>
>>>>>>be<br>
>>>>>> noted that the proposed
withdrawal of NTIA from IANA functions will<br>
>>>>>> remove<br>
>>>>>> NTIA as a source of
accountability enforcement.<br>
>>>>>> I propose that the Sub
Group look for other contractual sources and<br>
>>>>>>at<br>
>>>>>> the<br>
>>>>>> same time explore the
possibility of broadening the scope of<br>
>>>>>> accountability
enforceable by contract.<br>
>>>>>> For example, the
registries and registrars could enter into<br>
>>>>>>contracts<br>
>>>>>> with<br>
>>>>>> ICANN covering the IANA
functions in addition to the following:<br>
>>>>>> 1. ICANN could agree by
binding contract not to impose rules on<br>
>>>>>>third<br>
>>>>>> parties (by means of
policies, accreditation standards, or required<br>
>>>>>> contract terms) that are
not supported by a demonstrated consensus<br>
>>>>>> among<br>
>>>>>> affected parties.<br>
>>>>>> 2. ICANN could agree by
binding contract not to impose rules on<br>
>>>>>>third<br>
>>>>>> parties (by means of
policies, accreditation standards, or required<br>
>>>>>> contract terms) that do
not relate to issues the uniform resolution<br>
>>>>>>of<br>
>>>>>> which is necessary to
assure sound operation of the domain name<br>
>>>>>> system.<br>
>>>>>> 3. ICANN could agree by
binding contract not to impose rules on<br>
>>>>>>third<br>
>>>>>> parties (by means of
policies, accreditation standards, or required<br>
>>>>>> contract terms) that
relate to online content or to online behavior<br>
>>>>>> that<br>
>>>>>> does not threaten the
sound operation of the domain name system?<br>
>>>>>> 4. ICANN could agree that
any claim that it has not complied with<br>
>>>>>>the<br>
>>>>>> previous three
obligations may be brought by any adversely
affected<br>
>>>>>> party<br>
>>>>>> before an independent
review panel that can issue decisions that are<br>
>>>>>> binding on ICANN.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> David<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> David W. Maher<br>
>>>>>> Senior Vice President
Law & Policy<br>
>>>>>> Public Interest Registry<br>
>>>>>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:312%20375%204849" value="+13123754849">312
375 4849</a><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> On 12/15/14 9:30 AM,
"Samantha Eisner" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org">Samantha.Eisner@icann.org</a>><br>
>>>>>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Hi all -<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> I posted a new
version of the document on the wiki page in clean<br>
>>>>>>>and<br>
>>>>>>> redline form. The
proposed changes include:<br>
>>>>>>> 1. To address Malcolm
Hutty¹s edit regarding contractual sources of<br>
>>>>>>> accountability, I
made a ³contract² heading and also listed<br>
>>>>>>>Registry<br>
>>>>>>> and<br>
>>>>>>> Registrar Contracts
under there.<br>
>>>>>>> 2. To address David¹s
inclusion of SSAC recommendations as a source<br>
>>>>>>> of<br>
>>>>>>> accountability, I
incorporated a heading under Bylaws that<br>
>>>>>>>accounted<br>
>>>>>>> for<br>
>>>>>>> Advisory Committee
inputs. (Note that action is pending on ATRT2<br>
>>>>>>> recommendations
regarding ICANN¹s obligations on considerate of<br>
>>>>>>> advice<br>
>>>>>> >from ACs other than
the GAC). Because identifying accountability<br>
>>>>>>in<br>
>>>>>>> terms<br>
>>>>>>> of advice did not
then seem complete without reference to the<br>
>>>>>>>policy<br>
>>>>>>> recommendations upon
which that advice is often given, I referenced<br>
>>>>>>> the<br>
>>>>>>> policy
development/Board consideration of policy
recommendations<br>
>>>>>>>for<br>
>>>>>>> each<br>
>>>>>>> of the SOs.<br>
>>>>>>> 3. Inserted summary
listings of all ATRT recommendations (1 and 2)<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> In terms of
background documentation, I modified the page to
make a<br>
>>>>>>> clear<br>
>>>>>>> delineation between
the background info and the drafting work<br>
>>>>>>> ongoing.<br>
>>>>>>> In<br>
>>>>>>> line with David¹s
concern and Bruce¹s suggestion, I excerpted the<br>
>>>>>>> presentation I
previously circulated, and posted only the part
that<br>
>>>>>>> deals<br>
>>>>>>> with the inventory
effort, so as not to bring all the questions in<br>
>>>>>>>at<br>
>>>>>>> this<br>
>>>>>>> stage.<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> I also included an
excerpt to the inventory effort undertaken by<br>
>>>>>>> ICANN in<br>
>>>>>>> advance of the first
postings on Enhancing ICANN Accountability.<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Please let me know if
you have any questions.<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Sam<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> On 12/13/14, 4:01 PM,
"Bruce Tonkin"<br>
>>>>>>> <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au">Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au</a>><br>
>>>>>>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> Hello Samantha,<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> Is it possible to
split this presentation from London into its two<br>
>>>>>>>> components?<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> The first few
slides list some of the accountability mechanisms<br>
>>>>>>>> available<br>
>>>>>>>> within the ICANN
structure. The ATRT2 review identified some<br>
>>>>>>>> improvements to
make to these mechanisms.<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> The slides from
11-28 are a general presentation about<br>
>>>>>>>> accountability<br>
>>>>>>> >from Professor
Jan Aart Scholte, School of Global Studies,<br>
>>>>>>> .University<br>
>>>>>>>> of<br>
>>>>>>>> Gothenburg.<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> He lists 9
framing questions to consider when looking at<br>
>>>>>>>> accountability<br>
>>>>>>>> mechanisms:<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> (1) What is
accountability?<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
processes whereby an actor answers to other actors
for the<br>
>>>>>>>> impacts on<br>
>>>>>>>> them of its
actions and omissions<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> (2) with what
components?<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
transparency<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
consultation<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
monitoring and evaluation<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
correction and redress<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> (3) for what
purpose?<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
financial review; 'the accounts'<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
performance measurement<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
democratic participation/control<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> - moral
probity; ecological integrity; peace; etc.<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> (4)
Accountability by whom?<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
challenge of pinning down and specifying impact in
the context<br>
>>>>>>>>of<br>
>>>>>>>> complex
polycentric governance<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> (5) for what?<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> - actual
formal mandate<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> - desired
mandate (content? spam? digital access?)<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> (6) to whom?<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> - 'the
public' of significantly affected people (but<br>
>>>>>>>>metaphysical,<br>
>>>>>>>> ecological?)<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> - 'the
public' not unitary, as different people are
differently<br>
>>>>>>>> affected<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
constituencies (divisions within and overlaps
between)<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> (7) for whom?<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> - myth of
a universal 'global community' with same interests
and<br>
>>>>>>>> equal<br>
>>>>>>>> power<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> - skewed
accountability on lines of age, caste, class,<br>
>>>>>>>> (dis)ability,<br>
>>>>>>>> faith, gender,
geography, language, nationality, race, sexuality<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> (8) via what
channels?<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
hegemonic veto<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
intergovernmental multilateralism<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> - (global)
political parties and parliaments<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
multi-stakeholder arrangements<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> - civil
society deliberation and mobilization<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
judiciary (court, inspection panel, evaluation
exercises,<br>
>>>>>>>> ombudsman)<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> - mass
media<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> (9) how
accountably?<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> - 'When
you point a finger, you need to do it with a clean
hand'<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> -
transparency, consultation, monitoring and redress
of those<br>
>>>>>>>>who<br>
>>>>>>>> (claim to) speak
for affected publics<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> Regards,<br>
>>>>>>>> Bruce Tonkin<br>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>>>> Ccwg-accountability1 mailing
list<br>
>>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Ccwg-accountability1@icann.org">Ccwg-accountability1@icann.org</a><br>
>>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability1"
target="_blank">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability1</a><br>
>>>> --<br>
>>>> *****************************<br>
>>>> Mathieu WEILL<br>
>>>> AFNIC - directeur général<br>
>>>> Tél: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B33%201%2039%2030%2083%2006"
value="+33139308306">+33 1 39 30 83 06</a><br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a><br>
>>>> Twitter : @mathieuweill<br>
>>>> *****************************<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>>> Ccwg-accountability1 mailing list<br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Ccwg-accountability1@icann.org">Ccwg-accountability1@icann.org</a><br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability1"
target="_blank">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability1</a><br>
>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>> Ccwg-accountability1 mailing list<br>
>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Ccwg-accountability1@icann.org">Ccwg-accountability1@icann.org</a><br>
>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability1"
target="_blank">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability1</a><br>
><br>
>--<br>
>*****************************<br>
>Mathieu WEILL<br>
>AFNIC - directeur général<br>
>Tél: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B33%201%2039%2030%2083%2006"
value="+33139308306">+33 1 39 30 83 06</a><br>
><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a><br>
>Twitter : @mathieuweill<br>
>*****************************<br>
><br>
>_______________________________________________<br>
>Ccwg-accountability1 mailing list<br>
><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Ccwg-accountability1@icann.org">Ccwg-accountability1@icann.org</a><br>
><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability1"
target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability1</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ccwg-accountability1 mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Ccwg-accountability1@icann.org">Ccwg-accountability1@icann.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability1"
target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability1</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************
</pre>
</body>
</html>