[Area 4] 40 items added

[Eric Brunner-Williams]

Siva,

Thanks again. Is there a reason why Robert is identified separately? Is 
his contribution (your #40) made separately from those (not yet present 
in your list) made by the SSAC?

Eric

On 1/13/15 5:44 PM, Sivasubramanian M wrote:
> Thanks Eric.  Did some more work.
>
> The authors are:
>
> Olivier Crepin-LeBlond
> Robert Guerra
> Business Constituency
> Mathieu Weill
> SSAC
>
> Sivasubramanian M <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams 
> <ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net <mailto:ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net>> wrote:
>
>     Siva,
>
>     I'll pick those up tomorrow. Could you confirm who the authors of
>     these are, e.g., the "Olivier", the "Robert", etc., in case there
>     is a need for clarification.
>
>     Thanks in advance,
>     Eric
>
>
>     On 1/13/15 12:40 PM, Sivasubramanian M wrote:
>>     Thank You Eric.  I have added four more scenarios and wrote down
>>     some preventive / mitigation pointers.
>>
>>     Sivasubramanian M
>>     <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
>>
>>     On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams
>>     <ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net <mailto:ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net>> wrote:
>>
>>         Colleagues,
>>
>>         During yesterday's ConCall Sivasubramanian M provided a link
>>         to a set of contingencies / scenarios he is managing. For my
>>         own purposes I've used some of each of his contingencies /
>>         scenarios to form a short, and possibly relevant identifier.
>>
>>         This note is simply informative, providing the URL of the
>>         original, below my personal short identifiers, to allow Mr.
>>         Sivasubramanian to know that I'm reading his document, and to
>>         provide you all with the URL for your own purposes.
>>
>>         Eric Brunner-Williams
>>         Eugene, Oregon
>>
>>
>>              1    Cancellation of the AoC
>>              2    Flight to avoid jurisdiction
>>              3    Insolvency
>>              4    Applicant Support Revisited
>>              5    Ignoring SSAC
>>              6    GAC Votes
>>              7    .xxx redux
>>              8    Contested gTLD Redelegation
>>              9    Enjoined Delegation
>>             10    Contested ccTLD Redelegation
>>             11    Governmental sanctions and restrictions
>>             12    Domain industry financial crisis
>>             13    Significant financial contributor fee escrow
>>             14    Competing new technology
>>             15    Governance crisis
>>             16    Major corruption or fraud
>>             17    Antitrust or class action
>>             18    Chairman, CEO or major officer conduct
>>             19    Major personal data leak
>>             20    Financial crisis affecting Icann's reserves
>>             21    IANA Customer Standing Committee (CSC) failure
>>             22    IANA Periodic Review Team (PRT) failure
>>             23    Current IANA functions operator threatens litigation
>>             24    A stakeholder captures a multi-stakeholder committee
>>             25    A stakeholder ensures overwhelming control of processes
>>             26    A country captures the process of the PRT
>>             27    Members of the PRT have their lives threatened
>>             28    The PRT is overwhelmed with complaints
>>             29    Terrible appeals judgments by Independent Appeals Panel
>>             30    Current IANA functions operator threatens litigation
>>             31    Rogue Board
>>             32    Rogue Employees
>>             33    Contracting Entity refuses to follow policy or
>>         instructions from PRT
>>             34    Operator goes rogue
>>             35    ALAC and GNSO do not see eye to eye
>>             36    ccTLDs and gTLDs strongly disagree
>>             37    ccTLDs that are not part of ICANN oppose ccTLD
>>         policies and programs
>>             38    Escalated conflicts between ICANN Board and Staff
>>             39    Nomcom is highly politicized
>>             40    NTIA holds off transferring control until all
>>         conditions are met
>>
>>
>>         https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QVC12Q-NuB35pyaBirUDF85DBR_oFHkEYC5vbWu04go/edit#heading=h.rraejy2i0t2g
>>
>>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability4/attachments/20150113/d1431106/attachment.html>