<p dir="ltr">Eric<br>
Trival pursuit it may be...not sure.<br>
Is there a possibility that the IANA function be registered elsewhere With revised "affair. Of commit"...for control & protection of the icann board? ...or ..maybe not in area4's scenario?</p>
<p dir="ltr">Rudi Daniel<br>
ICT consulting &LED lighting<br>
784 430 9235</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 18, 2014 2:36 PM, "Eric Brunner-Williams" <<a href="mailto:ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net">ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>Rudi,<br>
<br>
If I recall correctly the incorporators worked for Jones Day, and
their acts as incorporators were approved by the initial Board on
10-25-98.<br>
<br>
ISI, where Dr. Jon Postel was employed, and the IANA Function
conducted (mostly by Jon), is a unit of USC. <br>
<br>
You can of course ask Ira, as he may know, or you can ask any of
Esther, Michael, or Louis.<br>
<br>
I don't recall any other jurisdictions being considered at the
time, Deleware is the usual, but really offers little advantage.<br>
<br>
In any event, trivial pursuits of early ICANNia is off-topic for
the CCWG, and WG4.<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Eric</font><div class="elided-text"><br>
<br>
On 12/18/14 10:16 AM, Rudolph Daniel wrote:<br>
</div></div><div class="elided-text">
<blockquote type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">I would also like to know the reason ICANN chose to
register in Calif.<br>
Other jurisdictions were considered at the time.<br>
</p>
<p dir="ltr">Rudi Daniel<br>
ICT consulting & LED lighting<br>
<a href="tel:784%20430%209235" value="+17844309235" target="_blank">784 430 9235</a></p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 18, 2014 1:57 PM, "Eric
Brunner-Williams" <<a href="mailto:ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net" target="_blank">ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net</a>>
wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Dear Colleagues,<br>
<br>
ICANN has disclosed that the email credentials of several
members of staff have been compromised. [1]<br>
<br>
I suggest that a credible scenario is the compromise of some
resource critical to some accountability process. The form
of compromise may be loss of the resource, such as the loss
of a cryptographic key, or the disclosure of the resource,
such as email credentials.<br>
<br>
The accountability process compromised could be any one or
more of the Corporation's ByLaws Redress Mechanisms [2], or
those which are external to the Corporation [3].<br>
<br>
I will follow up with Staff on the existing Business
Continuity Plan of Record, as credential loss and/or
disclosure should fall within the Corporation's BC PoR, and
it may be somewhat pertinent at the moment.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Eric Brunner-Williams<br>
Eugene, Oregon<br>
<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-12-16-en" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-12-16-en</a><br>
[2] (a) Reconsideration, (b) Independent third-party review,
(c) Periodic review, and (d) Ombudsman.<br>
[3] (a) Affirmation of Commitments, (b) Jurisdiction of
California and the United States, (c) Other Jurisdictions,
and (d) Contractual requirements.<br>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ccwg-accountability4 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ccwg-accountability4@icann.org" target="_blank">Ccwg-accountability4@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability4" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability4</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div>
</blockquote></div>