<p dir="ltr">Eric<br>
Yes...You got my intended meaning..& In relation to wg4s remit.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Rudi Daniel<br>
ICT consulting & LED lighting<br>
784 430 9235</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 18, 2014 5:04 PM, "Eric Brunner-Williams" <<a href="mailto:ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net">ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>Rudi,<br>
<br>
If I understand your note, and it is rather terse, I think you're
suggesting something that isn't actually a "risk" to any specific
existing process or mechanism of accountability, but a
Contractor-initiated change of domicile, and a modification to the
Affirmation of Commitments (AoC).<br>
<br>
You're free to speculate of course, but I personally don't see
intentional acts by the incumbent contractor as "risks" to be
anticipated and mitigated by an improvement in the accountability
processes or mechanisms. Perhaps you could check with Thomas and
Mathieu to determine if, in their views, your scenario falls
within WG4's remit.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Eric Brunner-Williams<br>
Eugene, Oregon<br>
<br>
On 12/18/14 11:17 AM, Rudolph Daniel wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">Eric<br>
Trival pursuit it may be...not sure.<br>
Is there a possibility that the IANA function be registered
elsewhere With revised "affair. Of commit"...for control &
protection of the icann board? ...or ..maybe not in area4's
scenario?</p>
<p dir="ltr">Rudi Daniel<br>
ICT consulting &LED lighting<br>
<a href="tel:784%20430%209235" value="+17844309235" target="_blank">784 430 9235</a></p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 18, 2014 2:36 PM, "Eric
Brunner-Williams" <<a href="mailto:ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net" target="_blank">ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net</a>>
wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>Rudi,<br>
<br>
If I recall correctly the incorporators worked for Jones
Day, and their acts as incorporators were approved by the
initial Board on 10-25-98.<br>
<br>
ISI, where Dr. Jon Postel was employed, and the IANA
Function conducted (mostly by Jon), is a unit of USC. <br>
<br>
You can of course ask Ira, as he may know, or you can ask
any of Esther, Michael, or Louis.<br>
<br>
I don't recall any other jurisdictions being considered at
the time, Deleware is the usual, but really offers little
advantage.<br>
<br>
In any event, trivial pursuits of early ICANNia is
off-topic for the CCWG, and WG4.<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Eric</font>
<div><br>
<br>
On 12/18/14 10:16 AM, Rudolph Daniel wrote:<br>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">I would also like to know the reason ICANN
chose to register in Calif.<br>
Other jurisdictions were considered at the time.<br>
</p>
<p dir="ltr">Rudi Daniel<br>
ICT consulting & LED lighting<br>
<a href="tel:784%20430%209235" value="+17844309235" target="_blank">784 430 9235</a></p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 18, 2014 1:57 PM, "Eric
Brunner-Williams" <<a href="mailto:ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net" target="_blank">ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net</a>>
wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Dear
Colleagues,<br>
<br>
ICANN has disclosed that the email credentials of
several members of staff have been compromised.
[1]<br>
<br>
I suggest that a credible scenario is the
compromise of some resource critical to some
accountability process. The form of compromise may
be loss of the resource, such as the loss of a
cryptographic key, or the disclosure of the
resource, such as email credentials.<br>
<br>
The accountability process compromised could be
any one or more of the Corporation's ByLaws
Redress Mechanisms [2], or those which are
external to the Corporation [3].<br>
<br>
I will follow up with Staff on the existing
Business Continuity Plan of Record, as credential
loss and/or disclosure should fall within the
Corporation's BC PoR, and it may be somewhat
pertinent at the moment.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Eric Brunner-Williams<br>
Eugene, Oregon<br>
<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-12-16-en" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-12-16-en</a><br>
[2] (a) Reconsideration, (b) Independent
third-party review, (c) Periodic review, and (d)
Ombudsman.<br>
[3] (a) Affirmation of Commitments, (b)
Jurisdiction of California and the United States,
(c) Other Jurisdictions, and (d) Contractual
requirements.<br>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ccwg-accountability4 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ccwg-accountability4@icann.org" target="_blank">Ccwg-accountability4@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability4" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability4</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div>