<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hello all,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CCWG ACCT WP1 Meeting#1<span style="color:#1F497D">3</span> - 1<span style="color:#1F497D">3</span> June will be available here:
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><a href="https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53777768">https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53777768</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">A copy of the notes and action items may be found below.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best regards,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Kim<o:p></o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14.0pt">ACTION Items<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Notes<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">NOTES & ACTION ITEMS:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">These high-level notes are designed to help you navigate through content<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">of the call and do not substitute in any way the transcript.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">How are summaries been written, checking how these are being drawn up?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">ready for the CCWG mtg on Friday in BA<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Fiona has covered 11 and 12. If time look at the updated comments from<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Steve<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Agenda accepted<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Looked at WP2 for consistency of approach. Present an overall impression<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">of the comments and the an overview of the comments: No negative<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">operational impacts, and did want a budget and plan that takes into<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">account of all relevant community input. This a first draft review.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Roelof: what are we seeing in the document? All comments of WP2 or a<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">part? <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Only a summary of the 22 comments lodged for Q8. Suggest to prepare the<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">same style of comment for each section of questions.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Q. And additional elements that could be helpfully added?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Next. Question 9. Any comments?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Was there a more strongly worded objection in the previous - and suggest<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">need to not bury such strong divergence. Surface and deal with out-right<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">opposition, and address.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">When summarizing, please highlight outright divergence.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Anyone noticing such an issues/omission, please go in and enter a note<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">using track changes.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">For example 278 stands out.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There areas where the commenter may have mis-understood our question. But<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">an example, R Hill, the staff summary does not capture the whole of his<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">comment and the level of divergence. How to capture that?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Reading the comments reveals subtleties that are otherwise missed from the<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">summary documents. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Summary of Q11. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The comments have been tagged, but more detail to summary impression would<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">be helpful. Yes, will do before next call.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">335. USCIB. Talking of spilling of entire board at 80% so is misplaced.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Not about removal of individuals.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If in the wrong place then highlight in yellow. And inform<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Adam/Alice/Jordan and where to move it to.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Summary of Q12.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Noting that this was a mechanism of last resort. Will go back and add<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">summary for each of the comments.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Reasonable for the drafters to add a CCWG response for each comment. We<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">will be publishing a review document.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">359. Concern was around the issue of threshold.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">AoC material. Steve second draft that expands on the material. Q13 and<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">comment 373.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Retaining Avri's language and took additional from the proposal. Summary<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">at the top yet added.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">R Hill, if CA does not law give full powers then US may not be best<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">location? <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Yes, to a person who is member and a legal person.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So not a disagreement or concern, there is no problem with CA location.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Differentiation between what Richard means about full-powers and what we<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">mean of the 5 things we want to do.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">376, mistaken notion, that reviews are not proposed as being brought in as<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">they are. And misunderstanding about the timing.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">379 Govt of Spain. Termination of AoC after the transition. Do we make<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">changes in our next draft? And this may be an issue for the agenda item<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">for Friday in BA. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Reg group. Inconsistencies. Want the ability to sunset reviews, with<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">WHOIS a good candidate.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Do we think a community driven review is sufficiently bottom-up?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Trickiness on full bottom-up process, to some means the PDP process rather<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">than the review and AoC process. Check what registries mean.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">381. JH. Mistaken notion. And mistaken notion that 8b was driving<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">changes, when it's in the current bylaws. Not a disagreement or a concern.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">382. Explicit. 383. Increase the time between reviews - does UK want<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">further apart?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">USCIB. Not feasible and appropriate, those words are from the AoC. Do we<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cut words as we bring them over from reviews<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">386 - Mistaken notion<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Action: Avri and Steve will continue.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Action: Request to begin on the summary area.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">223. Asked for words from Sidley, and been provided. Clarification added.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Individual persons are legal persons<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Once the summary is completed the collective process is more useful.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Review this content on Sunday 18:00 UTC call. Agree?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sunday: Look at AoC in corporation. Look at summaries on Director remove<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">section. Look at the bylaws material. And proposal section for CCWG to<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">look through in BA<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">AoB? <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If you need to work in Word Doc, please work in track changes.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">END<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:8.0pt;line-height:105%"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>