<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I support this latest version.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg Shatan</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:51 PM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx" target="_blank">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">Dear all,<div><br></div><div>We have OK from the HR subgroup with two minor edits from Niels.</div><div><br></div><div>If I receive no comments or opposition from anyone on this Legal Committee list by Wednesday 23 November at 23:59 UTC, then I will forward these questions to ICANN legal.</div><div><br></div><div><br><div>
<div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>León</div>
</div>
<div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>Inicio del mensaje reenviado:</div><br class="m_-8678291691213893785Apple-interchange-newline"><div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,sans-serif;color:rgba(0,0,0,1.0)"><b>De: </b></span><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,sans-serif">Niels ten Oever <<a href="mailto:lists@nielstenoever.net" target="_blank">lists@nielstenoever.net</a>><br></span></div><div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,sans-serif;color:rgba(0,0,0,1.0)"><b>Asunto: </b></span><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,sans-serif"><b>Re: [Ws2-hr] FW: My suggestions for tweaking HR Sub-Team questions after yesterday's Legal team call</b><br></span></div><div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,sans-serif;color:rgba(0,0,0,1.0)"><b>Fecha: </b></span><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,sans-serif">22 de noviembre de 2016, 14:25:56 GMT-6<br></span></div><div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,sans-serif;color:rgba(0,0,0,1.0)"><b>Para: </b></span><span style="font-family:-webkit-system-font,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,sans-serif"><a href="mailto:ws2-hr@icann.org" target="_blank">ws2-hr@icann.org</a>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <<a href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx" target="_blank">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>><br></span></div><div><div class="h5"><br><div><div>Thanks Leon and David,<br><br>This seems OK with me, I've changed 'progress' into 'process' as<br>suggested by Jorge Cancio, and added 'In the view of ICANN legal' to<br>question 2-4.<br><br>I am greatly looking forward to the response of ICANN legal.<br><br>Best,<br><br>Niels<br><br><br>1. With respect to ICANN legal’s understanding of the definition<br>of “applicable law”:<br><br>a. Has ICANN legal developed an understanding of the meaning of<br>the term “applicable law”?<br><br>b. If so, does that understanding apply in the context of the new<br>bylaw at Article 1.2(b)(viii)?<br><br>c. Would the following definition of “applicable law,” currently<br>under consideration by the CCWG WS2 Sub-Team on Human Rights, be<br>consistent with either or both of those?:<br><br><quote>: Applicable law refers to the body of law that binds<br>ICANN at any given time, in any given circumstance and in any relevant<br>jurisdiction. It consists of statutes, rules, regulations, etcetera,<br>as well as judicial opinions, where appropriate. It is a dynamic<br>concept inasmuch as laws, regulations, etcetera, change over time.<br>Applicable law can have disparate impacts on ICANN around the globe:<br>for example, if ICANN employs personnel in different jurisdictions<br>then it must observe the appropriate labour laws in those various<br>locales. Applicable law is thus a large body of law that eludes our<br>ability to catalogue, but it is ascertainable in the context of a<br>specific question or issue. </quote><br><br>d. Please share the applicable understanding(s).<br><br>2. In the view of ICANN legal, what does the term “Respect” mean<br>according to the bylaws (in relation to Core Values)?<br><br>3. In the view of ICANN legal, what is the relationship between<br>core values and commitments in general; and the HR core value and<br>commitments in particular?<br><br>4. In the view of ICANN legal, how does the balancing process<br>between core values, as described in the bylaws, take place? Is it<br>documented?<br><br><br><br><br>On 11/22/2016 08:37 PM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">Dear David,<br><br>Thanks for this. As soon as we have OK from the HR Sub-group, I will be<br>happy to forward the questions to ICANN legal.<br><br><br>Saludos,<br><br><br><br>León<br><br></blockquote><br>-- <br>Niels ten Oever<br>Head of Digital<br><br>Article 19<br><a href="http://www.article19.org" target="_blank">www.article19.org</a><br><br>PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4<br> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9<br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ccwg-accountability5 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ccwg-accountability5@icann.org">Ccwg-accountability5@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability5" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ccwg-accountability5</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>