[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] [Ext] Re: REMINDER Re: Please participate - survey re. whether ICANN Org should be able to apply for funds
Joke Braeken
joke.braeken at icann.org
Thu Aug 24 15:03:31 UTC 2017
Dear Olga,
Regarding today’s CCWG New gTLD Auction Proceeds call:
Date/Time: Thursday, 24 August 2017 at 14:00 UTC for 90 minutes
Adobe Connect: https://participate.icann.org/newgtlds-auction
Best regards,
Joke Braeken
ccNSO Policy Advisor
joke.braeken at icann.org
Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO
Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/
http://ccnso.icann.org
On 24/08/2017, 16:34, "ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Olga Cavalli" <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org on behalf of olgacavalli at gmail.com> wrote:
hi can you swnd me the link for adobe?
Im not in my office
thanks
> El 24 ago 2017, a las 10:24, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> escribió:
>
> Please note that as communicated in my email that the survey was opened until 22.00 UTC yesterday and subsequently closed again.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> On 8/24/17, 07:23, "喬敬" <chiao at brandma.co> wrote:
>
> the survey page says it's closed now....
>
>> On 8/24/17, Erika Mann <erika at erikamann.com> wrote:
>> Yes, keep it open Marika!
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Not having seen any immediate objections, I’ve gone ahead and re-opened
>>> the survey. Please submit your responses by 22.00 UTC at the latest.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Marika
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Carolina
>>> Caeiro <carolina at lacnic.net>
>>> *Date: *Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 14:24
>>> *To: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER Re: Please participate -
>>> survey re. whether ICANN Org should be able to apply for funds
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Are there any problems with re-opening the survey for a couple extra
>>> hours, say 10:00PM UTC? I was awaiting for some feedback and missed the
>>> deadline for some 20 minutes. I think this should still give us
>>> sufficient
>>> time for review ahead of tomorrow's meeting and some other group members
>>> might be in a similar situation?
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>>
>>> Carolina
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> El 23/8/17 a las 15:14, Marika Konings escribió:
>>>
>>> Please note that this poll has now been closed. You are encouraged to
>>> review the results ahead of tomorrow’s meeting here:
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_results_SM-2DK3MK9MY5_-5Bsurveymonkey.com-5D&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=s55rBRTMnXtsgnODh7DrwO0Za1uRCPCVbO8T63A6ZOk&s=Rt9QbNZpZIfvwlXl7HGOFPmQnj2lDMdyeL-XecbDa68&e=
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_results_SM-2DK3MK9MY5_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=o7RmJCwXVgbzxpnjhadXFvFU9MXfWgIEKEx7RKKQt7c&s=O2k7QhFCI1R3KLRPluuMW-wAcIJn9B1MM4446-xw6ZE&e=>.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Marika
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org>
>>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings
>>> <marika.konings at icann.org> <marika.konings at icann.org>
>>> *Date: *Monday, August 21, 2017 at 12:03
>>> *To: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org> <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>> *Subject: *[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER Re: Please participate -
>>> survey re. whether ICANN Org should be able to apply for funds
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Reminder – please participate in the poll if you have not done so yet.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Marika
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org>
>>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings
>>> <marika.konings at icann.org> <marika.konings at icann.org>
>>> *Date: *Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 06:12
>>> *To: *Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>>> <jrobinson at afilias.info>,
>>> 'Seun Ojedeji' <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>, "Xavier
>>> J. Calvez" <xavier.calvez at icann.org> <xavier.calvez at icann.org>
>>> *Cc: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org> <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>> *Subject: *[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Please participate - survey re. whether
>>> ICANN Org should be able to apply for funds
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan, thank you for your suggestion and others for chiming in. In
>>> consultation with the leadership team, staff has put together a short
>>> survey to obtain CCWG input on the questions you have outlined below
>>> which
>>> will hopefully help inform the CCWG deliberations on this topic. To
>>> participate in the survey, please go to https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=s55rBRTMnXtsgnODh7DrwO0Za1uRCPCVbO8T63A6ZOk&s=MQCq3kHy10DAtgBGA5rGF4VAYiS7bAmkmeNbT1E2ZeE&e=
>>> r/HRRV93W[surveymonkey.com]
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_HRRV93W&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=_T1cLFkwn8kLi5jr9uCCI3cTUNSqX0Cv-wIVN_Xqpqc&s=YWSOX8e-LtaTRwYSpnCY2VJtJ6ujbtxMW5EzSdyanhQ&e=>.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You are requested to provide your input by Wednesday 23 August at 18.00
>>> UTC at the latest.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Marika
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org>
>>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Jonathan Robinson
>>> <jrobinson at afilias.info> <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>>> *Organization: *Afilias
>>> *Reply-To: *Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>>> <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>>> *Date: *Friday, August 11, 2017 at 03:11
>>> *To: *'Seun Ojedeji' <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>,
>>> "Xavier J. Calvez" <xavier.calvez at icann.org> <xavier.calvez at icann.org>
>>> *Cc: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org> <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Notes & action items from today's
>>> CCWG-AP meeting
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A couple of thoughts on this topic.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On the subject of whether or not ICANN should have a 12 month operating
>>> expense reserve in place.
>>>
>>> Agreed that it seems to be common practice in the not for profit sector.
>>>
>>> Whether or not it should be the case for ICANN is an interesting
>>> question,
>>> but agreed, not one for this CWG.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In any event, Xavier has clarified that the current policy is that the
>>> level of operating reserve should be 12 months.
>>>
>>> My understanding of the question for this group is not whether or not we
>>> would sanction the (auction fund) money being used to top up the
>>> reserves.
>>>
>>> But rather, whether or not we would like to see rules in place that
>>> sanction ICANN (the organisation) applying for auction funds.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In evaluating that question of ICANN the organisation as a prospective
>>> applicant, a use or test case for that consideration is ICANN applying
>>> (under the same rules as anyone else) for auction funds to top up the
>>> ICANN
>>> reserve funds.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My personal view is that ICANN should be demonstrating a commitment to
>>> fulfilling its current policy (to have in place a 12 month reserve) by
>>> budgeting an operating surplus to build that reserve.
>>>
>>> In addition (independently of this CWG), ICANN should review its current
>>> policy on reserve funds.
>>>
>>> If these two criteria were met, it would make me personaly much more
>>> sympathetic to potentially topping up reserve funds (to some extent) with
>>> auction funds.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At the risk of being repetitive, it seems to me that the question for
>>> this
>>> CWG remains:
>>>
>>> - Whether or not ICANN the Organisation should be permitted to apply
>>> for funds?
>>> and
>>> - If so, what constraints should be place on this (use of funds,
>>> quantum etc)?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
>>> <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>]
>>> *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2017 7:18 AM
>>> *To:* Xavier J. Calvez <xavier.calvez at icann.org>
>>> <xavier.calvez at icann.org>
>>> *Cc:* ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Notes & action items from today's
>>> CCWG-AP meeting
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Xavier is right about reserve that covers operational expenses for
>>> minimum
>>> is say 12 month being normal practice. Some even do it for more; some
>>> RIRs
>>> have way above 1 year already while others are working towards same.
>>> However ofcourse none can match the fat figures of ICANN budget. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> However I don't think auction proceeds in this context can be referred to
>>> as surplus that can get ploughed back to achieve reserve target set by
>>> ICANN management NOR do I think it is a target/goal that this group
>>> should
>>> try to achieve.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I for will suggest that we should consider mechanisms that allow some
>>> community projects that ICANN normally fund in their budget to be
>>> eligible,
>>> which if approved (based on the process) may then result to more
>>> surpluses
>>> to ICANN and they(Board) can decide to put that to reserve.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my mobile
>>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 10, 2017 10:26 PM, "Xavier J. Calvez" <xavier.calvez at icann.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I apologize if I did not make the following clear: ICANN’s current policy
>>> is to have in place a reserve fund equivalent to at minimum 12 months of
>>> operating expenses. Refer to ICANN’s Investment Policy, see at
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_investment-2D&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=s55rBRTMnXtsgnODh7DrwO0Za1uRCPCVbO8T63A6ZOk&s=ce5OeiJcdVNSCNN4N23cb7ay3H6Pw8UXj-0S9rpjrwI&e=
>>> policy-2014-07-30-en[icann.org]
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_investment-2Dpolicy-2D2014-2D07-2D30-2Den&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=Dww8xHmK4zEHqHK0lHK7IdorPuvHkXKk1luyeB5pBxQ&s=rcBRrG4RZelJUExS-glQJgvDHB75hZlkZOX7O2qDG_A&e=>,
>>> see the paragraph “Size of Funds”, copied below).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> “The Reserve Fund shall contain any amounts not contained in the
>>> Operating
>>> Fund. Any surplus funds will be used to build up the Reserve Fund to a
>>> balance sufficient to cover an emergency requirement. The Reserve Fund is
>>> expected to reach and maintain a level of funds to maintain a minimum of
>>> 12
>>> months of expected expenditures.“
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I indicated that this level of a reserve fund is the commonly used in
>>> non-profit organizations.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Xavier
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Xavier Calvez
>>>
>>> ICANN – SVP & CFO
>>>
>>> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>>>
>>> Los Angeles, CA 90094
>>>
>>> Phone: 310-301-5838 <(310)%20301-5838>
>>>
>>> Mobile: 805-312-0052 <(805)%20312-0052>
>>>
>>> Fax: 310-957-2348 <(310)%20957-2348>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Alan
>>> Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>>> *Date: *Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 1:41 PM
>>> *To: *Dietmar Stefitz <djs at bemarnet.es>, Michael Karanicolas <
>>> mkaranicolas at gmail.com>, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>>> *Cc: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Notes & action items from today's
>>> CCWG-AP meeting
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To be clear, I don't think anyone on the call suggested we build up the
>>> reserve to a 12 or 24 month level of current budget. Xavier said that 1
>>> year was a typical norm for non-profits, but in my opinion, there is no
>>> need for that, as in the case of emergency, costs could be ramped down
>>> quickly.
>>>
>>> I vaguely recall that the level that we were targeting (before the drain
>>> from the CCWG-Acct expenses) was something like $80m. So even if we
>>> contributed enough to get back to that level, it would be perhaps $40m.
>>>
>>> But the issue in my mind is not how much, but if.
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>>> At 10/08/2017 03:28 PM, Dietmar Stefitz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Erika and all,
>>>
>>> I have been very astonished to hear the proposal to use the Auction Money
>>> in filling up the reserve account of ICANN.
>>> Filling up for 12 month reserve or 24 month reserve, if we have to take
>>> 24
>>> month, there will not be much left to disburse to other projects.
>>>
>>> I thought that the call from Xavier has been to explain specially the
>>> Investment of the fund at this moment, for which I can only congratulate.
>>> A 1% return on a super save investment is not bad, and it should be made
>>> like this in the future.
>>>
>>> I would absolutely be against a filling up of the reserve fund from the
>>> auction proceeds, at least as a decision from this group.
>>> Or did I misunderstand something?
>>>
>>> Dietmar Stefitz
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thursday, August 10, 2017, 8:05:56 PM, you wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *MK> Hi Kavouss, MK> Am I missing something - or are you suggesting that
>>> the CCWG should MK> only determine whether or not money be fed into
>>> ICANN's
>>> reserve MK> account, without also indicating what proportion should be
>>> used
>>> to MK> that effect? MK> If so - I don't see how the CCWG could consider
>>> anything beyond that MK> simple yes/no question, as we'd have no
>>> indication
>>> how much money we MK> would have leftover to work with, once the reserve
>>> is
>>> replenished. MK> Decisions about allocation priorities can't really be
>>> made
>>> unless we MK> also look at how the pie should be portioned out, right?
>>> MK>
>>> Michael Karanicolas MK> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Kavouss Arasteh
>>> MK> <* kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *> wrote: >> Dear Erika, Dear All, >> Today during the last 15 mints of
>>> the call I tried to draw your attention to >> allow me to intervene on
>>> the
>>> views expressed by Alan reading the Reserve >> account. >> If I have well
>>> understood his statement he wanted that CCWG discuss the >> level of
>>> ICANN
>>> reserve account which was announced by Xavier to be >> equivalent to one
>>> year budget as objective. As Xavier mentioned this level >> has not been
>>> reached. >> Alan’s view that CCWG discuss the level of ICANN reserve
>>> account is outside*
>>> * >> the mandate of CCWG. We may just decide whether or not that account
>>> be fed*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * >> by using Auction money but decision on the appropriate level of the
>>> reserve >> account is totally outside or mandate as it is a decision to
>>> be
>>> made by the >> Board and not by this group >> Regards >> Kavouss >> On
>>> Thu,
>>> Aug 10, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Joke Braeken <*joke.braeken at icann.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *> >> wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> Please find below the notes and action
>>> items from today’s CCWG-AP meeting.*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * >>> Best regards,*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * >>> Joke Braeken*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * >>> Notes CCWG – AP Meeting 10 August 2017:*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * >>> These high-level notes are designed to help the CCWG navigate
>>> through the*
>>>
>>>
>>> * >>> content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the
>>> transcript >>> and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are
>>> provided
>>> separately and >>> are posted on the wiki at: *
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_DLHDAw-5Bcommunity.icann.org-5D&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=s55rBRTMnXtsgnODh7DrwO0Za1uRCPCVbO8T63A6ZOk&s=oXW-kGiueqqVE_xyCbUBAXtTglC1xabts8nfoCay0OU&e=
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_DLHDAw&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=6OyX-H7GEmBCRJWXNDGE46VvO6oDVoRB82Z2AeomXAg&e=>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *. >>> Roll Call >>> Please state your name for transcription purposes
>>> and
>>> keep microphones on >>> mute when not speaking. >>> Attendance will be
>>> taken from the AdobeConnect room. >>> Welcome – DOI*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * >>> Overview from Xavier Calvez on investment management >>> The
>>> intention of this presentation is >>> to allow the group to think on the
>>> issue of investment, >>> to understand ICANN's practice, and to answer
>>> any
>>> questions that might be >>> raised. >>> It helps to inform the discussion
>>> on the ROI of the fund; It includes an >>> overview of how the auction
>>> proceeds are currently managed, which might lead >>> to how they might be
>>> managed in the future. >>> Important to note: >>> only conservative
>>> investment policies are being used >>> the investment strategy will be
>>> designed in support of the objectives >>> An overview of some
>>> illustrative
>>> investment scenarios was provided, >>> followed by Q&A. >>> Parameters
>>> that
>>> need to be considered: >>> amount of money >>> horizon >>> level of risk
>>> (which is not correlated to the horizon) >>> Financial information is
>>> regularly provided during the quarterly >>> stakeholder calls. >>>
>>> (amount
>>> from latest update - Q3 data of FY17. *>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=s55rBRTMnXtsgnODh7DrwO0Za1uRCPCVbO8T63A6ZOk&s=kvnzPklNEIFMnKVS6_r_TXjudPGKiXFxpHAH6RrJJfU&e=
>>> quarterlyreports[icann.org]
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_quarterlyreports&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=baFsmaqAdvnSkJG4eoXhzZNn5-StHSA9z08s4kUvK4E&e=>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *) >>> Reserve Fund: 64 million >>> New gTLD unspent application fees:
>>> 128
>>> million >>> Auction proceeds: 233 million >>> Annual budget of ICANN.
>>> FY18
>>> budget expenses 142 million USD. >>> Regarding replenishing the reserve
>>> fund: appropriate procedures need to be >>> taken, appropriate approvals
>>> and decisions need to be in place for it to be >>> legal. >>> This is
>>> however a moral question as well. The charter does include this >>>
>>> question: “To what extent (and, if so, how) could ICANN, the
>>> Organization
>>> or*
>>> * >>> a constituent part thereof, be the beneficiary of some of the
>>> auction funds†*
>>>
>>> * >>> The group needs to discuss this at a later stage.*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * >>> Next meeting*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * >>> next CCWG-AP meeting is scheduled for Thursday 24 August at 14.00
>>> UTC*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * >>> = = = = >>> Action item #1: >>> CCWG to review the slides presented
>>> by Xavier (published on *>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=s55rBRTMnXtsgnODh7DrwO0Za1uRCPCVbO8T63A6ZOk&s=xU7SWiLUaetCVToGDvIABdvlGn71bTTlRlCx-0iKP38&e=
>>> display/CWGONGAP/2017-08-10+CCWG+New+gTLD+Auction+
>>> Proceeds+call[community.icann.org]
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_CWGONGAP_2017-2D08-2D10-2BCCWG-2BNew-2BgTLD-2BAuction-2BProceeds-2Bcall&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=FQiYsQAxL7CV_3RJCSjIYJtSMgDGoFBN-QeXmJoUPBU&e=>
>>> *) >>> and to share any further questions for Xavier on the group’s
>>> mailing list.*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * >>> Action item #2:*
>>>
>>> * >>> Per the discussion during the CCWG-AP meeting on 27 July 2017, the*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * >>> attached mind map was developed, which aims to regroup the
>>> objectives based >>> on the survey results as well as the subsequent
>>> discussions. The CCWG is >>> encouraged to continue to provide feedback
>>> on
>>> the proposed regrouping of >>> objectives/priorities, as well as the
>>> clustering of examples ahead of the >>> next meeting, scheduled for 24
>>> August at 14 UTC. >>> Action item #3: >>> CCWG to review responses to
>>> charter question #4 and to continue the >>> discussion on the mailing
>>> list.
>>>>>> (see *https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_results_SM-2D6GNDQHJ6_-5B&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=s55rBRTMnXtsgnODh7DrwO0Za1uRCPCVbO8T63A6ZOk&s=oJFWrlhwb5YrLQ_sA_AZ8LNBZSprYFletgZY6hqhUpU&e=
>>> surveymonkey.com]
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_results_SM-2D6GNDQHJ6_&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=yulKeXnAn5CN2_dNRAj8nx_5IeuwBT4F1Heh3dtZJWI&e=>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * ) >>> = = = = >>> Joke Braeken >>> ccNSO Policy Advisor *>>>
>>> joke.braeken at icann.org <joke.braeken at icann.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *>>> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: *https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ccNSO-5Btwitter.com-5D&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=s55rBRTMnXtsgnODh7DrwO0Za1uRCPCVbO8T63A6ZOk&s=qDaAbaB-h7qf_1pMsUzU3ldSIk17PWYH6EKZxkW3QDY&e=
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ccNSO&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=ksIYlCk3ZzcyyNbJFUxushrbiDZC4_lO_WVwmhRrWG4&e=>
>>>
>>> *>>> Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: *https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=s55rBRTMnXtsgnODh7DrwO0Za1uRCPCVbO8T63A6ZOk&s=s8WfnyOFZz3QaopltyoqfZtHVdJf5c9cbNEuJ48R3gc&e=
>>> ccnso/[facebook.com]
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_ccnso_&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=K_zzz3ZhAdQ0ckOqfmq_HvpwupZ-DfQbOd39kyGgqsI&e=>
>>>
>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ccnso.icann.org-5Bccnso.icann.org-5D&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=s55rBRTMnXtsgnODh7DrwO0Za1uRCPCVbO8T63A6ZOk&s=tr-SS0qZrzp31RKnMHgGIr7N_DV6HQV0ReDyb1ldpN4&e=
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ccnso.icann.org_&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=kopXyX7wBTECByzaEGsPL-Mbcct5zfvtn4kCkugUF3I&e=>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *>>> _______________________________________________ >>>
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list *>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>> <Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *>> _______________________________________________ >>
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list *>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>> <Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>>
>>>
>>> *MK> _______________________________________________ MK>
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list *MK> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>> <Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>> MK> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *-- Saludos, Dietmar Content-Type: text/plain;
>>> charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition:
>>> inline X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
>>> 1;MWHPR03MB2718;27:YWDqnEPXx/CS7utzz6td9Qa3koj9je2Sjv9LFnursD0J2VA30AdYQS9BENOC1oqUgmoT+mzlFx7ydYsubIRVesT4Y1jhb3iYxs4FdjVwmhiKOJ9o59lZBh7cDwAsDaB/
>>> X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
>>> ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(400001000128)(400125000095)(20160514016)(750103)(520002050)(400001001223)(400125100095)(61617095)(400001002128)(400125200095);
>>> _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>> mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>> <Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds>*
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>>>
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>>
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Carolina Caeiro
>>>
>>> *Coordinadora de Proyectos de Desarrollo*
>>> Coordinator of Development Projects
>>>
>>> *www.lacnic.net[lacnic.net]
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lacnic.net&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=o7RmJCwXVgbzxpnjhadXFvFU9MXfWgIEKEx7RKKQt7c&s=PVkvf8owDabNeVxQOitYmtIVe2X_nDxWaySYhlqqj6Y&e=>*
>>> * Latin American and Caribbean Internet Addresses Registry*
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>
>
> --
> Ching Chiao
> Founder & CEO
> Brandma Internet Group
> 中域国际集团
> www.brandma.com
>
> +886.918.211372 || +86.135.2018.7032 || +1.908.4990050
> Beijing . Chengdu . Hangzhou . Hong Kong . Shenzhen. Taipei
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds
mailing list