[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - CCWG AP Objective(s) Survey
Daniel Dardailler
danield at w3.org
Wed Jul 19 13:47:15 UTC 2017
As an introduction to the survey, in addition to reminding the words of
the mission statement of the by-laws, I would also remind people of the
core values and commitments, that is, Section 1.2.
These defines more largely the scope of what ICANN should do to perform
its mission, and disbursing the fund for the good of the Internet.
In a way, the mission has allowed the allocation of new gTLDs through
auctions, so it should allow the disbursement of funds in a way that
doesn't interfere with ICANN's ordinary activities (i.e. the mission
direct implementation) or provide perverse incentives to gTLD applicants
(which could derail the mission).
As Wendy pointer during the Joburg meeting, there is grounds to
distinguish
these funds and their constraints from the overall activities: while
both are bound globally by the corporate mission, the work of the CCWG
doesn't change ICANN's policy development process and constraints on
ordinary activity, and the auction funds' disbursement is linked to the
nature of their collection, as a byproduct of the new gTLD allocation
decision.
Maybe a few words on what we mean by "consistent with the mission" in
this survey would make sense in the intro, using the above reasoning
involving the mission but also the commitments to perform the mission.
On 2017-07-18 17:49, Marika Konings wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Per action item #4, please find at the following link a preview of the
> proposed survey concerning charter question #2 – objective(s) for
> fund allocation:
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=XtF4g0B8MN3nV7tnkhMvhFXhCiXyZVBGNUHow1I_2BzacwPmwRGAaujxO2pnWrYKWU
> [1]. Please remember that this is a preview – no responses will be
> recorded. You are encouraged to share any comments and/or proposed
> edits regarding the poll with the mailing list by Wednesday 19 July by
> close of business (wherever you are). Do not use the comment function
> that is available in preview mode as it is not possible for others to
> review comments or proposed edits, only for the owner of the survey.
> The objective is to launch the survey on Thursday of this week so that
> the responses can be reviewed during next week’s meeting.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> FROM: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Marika
> Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
> DATE: Thursday, July 13, 2017 at 17:39
> TO: "ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
> SUBJECT: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Notes and action items from today's
> CCWG-AP meeting
>
> Dear All,
>
> Please find below the notes and action items from today’s meeting.
> Please take particular note of the following action item:
>
> ACTION ITEM #2: CCWG members and participants that have not responded
> to the survey yet for charter question #4 are encouraged to complete
> the survey by 20 July (see
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/charterquestion4[surveymonkey.com] [2])
>
>
> ACTION ITEM #3: CCWG members and participants that have not responded
> to the survey yet are encouraged to complete the survey for charter
> question #7 by 20 July (see
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/charterquestion7[surveymonkey.com] [3])
>
>
> You will find the responses received to date in the attached
> documents. Please make sure that your views are recorded by responding
> to the survey.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> ===================
>
> NEW GTLD AUCTION PROCEEDS MEETING – 13 JULY 2017 - NOTES
>
> _These high-level notes are designed to help the CCWG navigate through
> the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the
> transcript and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are
> provided separately and are posted on the wiki at:
> https://community.icann.org/x/DLHDAw[community.icann.org] [4]._
>
> _1. Roll Call_
>
> * Roll call will be taken from Adobe Connect
> * Please remember to state your name for transcription purposes and
> remember to mute your microphone when not speaking
>
> _2. Welcome / DOI_
>
> * Productive meeting held at ICANN59 - those not able to participate
> are encouraged to review the transcript and recording.
> * Everyone is encouraged to participate in surveys and other requests
> for input as it will be imperative to be able to meet the timeline as
> set out in the work plan
>
> _3. Review of survey results charter question #4 (please
> complete the survey at
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/charterquestion4[surveymonkey.com] [2])
> _
>
> * To date, 15 responses have been received.
> * Currently views on question #1 re. timeframe for allocation of
> funds are equally split between one-off exercise and long lasting
> mechanism through possible investment.
> * What return on investment could be obtained - that may determine
> what timeframe you would be looking at? How much money per year, if
> the CCWG would want to pursue this approach? This could be a potential
> question for external experts? Board may also have input on this
> question based on experience to date. Funds are currently invested
> with a view of preservation so return is currently pretty small as
> investments are low risk.
> * In relation to the duration of projects to be supported, current
> responses indicate that there is no specific preference for short time
> or long term projects. Will at some point also need to consider cost
> of overhead of short term vs. long term projects. Should provide some
> further info on what is considered short term vs. long term. Short
> term could be 1 year or less, medium term up to 3 years, long term 5
> years and up.
> * Note that the different questions are interlinked. How money is
> allocated is linked to the magnitude of projects funded, duration,
> etc. Decisions on one will likely impact others.
> * Please consider that CCWG does not have to select one single
> mechanism. There can be one for short term / smaller amounts and other
> for long term / large disbursements.
> * Leadership team to review results and consider how to move forward
> if there is no clear preference on some of these questions.
>
> ACTION ITEM #1: Staff to reach out Xavier to obtain further input
> regarding current investment and return.
>
> ACTION ITEM #2: CCWG members and participants that have not responded
> to the survey yet are encouraged to complete the survey for charter
> question #4 by 20 July.
>
> _4. Review of survey results charter question #7 (please
> complete the survey at
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/charterquestion7[surveymonkey.com] [3])
> _
>
> * Difficult to answer without some further details - what would it
> entail for ICANN to do this? Would it be a question of 3 people or 20?
> Those details may determine whether it would be feasible and/or
> desirable to have ICANN manage this. May also be a question for
> external experts although some specificity would need to be provided
> to be able to provide a response.
> * One off - within ICANN, longer term - external to ICANN? May be
> dependent on the answer to that question. Setting up a foundation was
> not excluded when reviewing the AGB.
> * With regards to community volunteer involvement, need to consider
> not creating additional bureaucracy, costs as well as factor in
> possible conflicts of interest.
>
> ACTION ITEM #3: CCWG members and participants that have not responded
> to the survey yet are encouraged to complete the survey for charter
> question #7 by 20 July.
>
> 5. Review feedback received on charter question #2 survey &
> next steps (see attached documents)
>
> * No further feedback received on the mailing list. A number of
> updates made based on discussions during ICANN59 as well as one
> additional response received.
> * CCWG to determine how to move from this list to preliminary
> agreement on what the (preliminary) agreed objective for fund
> allocation should be.
> * Criteria must be implementable and consistent with ICANN's mission.
> Consider a possible check-list to see which of the criteria are most
> consistent with ICANN's mission.
> * Objectives and criteria are quite different. criteria refers
> normally (with grants management) to eligibility, forms to fill,
> licensing, use, copyright, etc. that is a very practical and
> operational. Objectives are very important as that help applicants to
> decide if they want to apply or not.
> * SDGs is a good framework to consider. To broaden the desired impact
> without broadening the mission (as ICANN's mission is narrow and might
> change again in the future).
> * Need to ask not only whether something is within ICANN"s mission,
> but also rationale.
> * Following determination / agreement on overall objective(s), CCWG
> could go back to concrete examples and stress test those against the
> mission.
>
> ACTION ITEM #4: Staff to work with leadership team to develop survey
> that would assess support for different objectives as well as
> assessment of whether it falls within ICANN's mission and why. Share
> survey for preview with CCWG prior to launch.
>
> _6. Questions for external experts – reminder (see
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/152k_W8Wkp7XecejOutuYbCwAITwgfU3uHyzZEVgznjA/edit)[docs.google.com]_
>
>
> * CCWG may need to identify at which stage of the process external
> input will be most helpful. May require further details on
> scope/objective for it to be a helpful conversation. Maybe focus first
> on scope/objective related questions to help inform the current stage
> of deliberations.
> * May need one-pager to explain status of work so external experts
> have an understanding of the work of the CCWG, especially with regards
> to scope. That may also help identify umbrella questions.
>
> ACTION ITEM #4: CCWG encouraged to add questions for external experts
> to the google doc at
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/152k_W8Wkp7XecejOutuYbCwAITwgfU3uHyzZEVgznjA/edit[docs.google.com]
> [5]
>
> _7. Confirm next steps & next meeting (Thursday 27 July at
> 14.00 UTC)_
>
> _ _
>
> _MARIKA KONINGS_
>
> _Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet
> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) _
>
> _Email: marika.konings at icann.org _
>
> _ _
>
> _Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO_
>
> _Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive
> courses[learn.icann.org] [6] and visiting the GNSO Newcomer
> pages[gnso.icann.org] [7]. _
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=XtF4g0B8MN3nV7tnkhMvhFXhCiXyZVBGNUHow1I_2BzacwPmwRGAaujxO2pnWrYKWU
> [2]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_charterquestion4&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=hgtZqwKIaf5xP0WALVNThpy7J1Q5nJfQ8hIUiur0BtI&s=a4BXmj_l7S2X1eHPtfFVx5R0s8gC2wYYPIhULD-ka48&e=
> [3]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_charterquestion7&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=hgtZqwKIaf5xP0WALVNThpy7J1Q5nJfQ8hIUiur0BtI&s=JREK3-xMXRTE5UcqWq-2UHPDANU0f1YjdsPoycA-JYs&e=
> [4]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_DLHDAw&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=4zHolvsBo6lsC2fsFnhbQd0l8fVzyqdj0t9oV6_NWjM&s=-vuUpZTVZXrpFcq3-nA--Ltl_ESCT71X4cBhx3axkEY&e=
> [5]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_152k-5FW8Wkp7XecejOutuYbCwAITwgfU3uHyzZEVgznjA_edit&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=hgtZqwKIaf5xP0WALVNThpy7J1Q5nJfQ8hIUiur0BtI&s=uZW2XypdnapzTHC4mUBW-j0_uDcqpZDTsUTEBJEgVV4&e=
> [6]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_gnso&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=hgtZqwKIaf5xP0WALVNThpy7J1Q5nJfQ8hIUiur0BtI&s=JK30S68uvE6uiUXSCUON-UFs1_JzdNemgzJXVGKhc_4&e=
> [7]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=hgtZqwKIaf5xP0WALVNThpy7J1Q5nJfQ8hIUiur0BtI&s=l4wvk5leVN2lbuk-hPoH32manu11JnH0yn7JR7EF630&e=
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds
mailing list