[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated version open internet definition / description

[Nadira Alaraj]

Thank you Daniel for pulling back ISOC policy paper on openness.
Thank you for highlighting on what technology can do vs. what user may do.
I also in support of Erika's move in putting the definition in the context
of what exactly relevant to this specific mission we the CCWG AP.
Unfortunately, I apologize for not being able to give a hand on these days.

On Sep 2, 2017 7:40 PM, "Daniel Dardailler" <danield at w3.org> wrote:

Hello Marika, all

Reading this document, I think I agree with Erika that we should consider
giving our collective view of what we, the CCWG, think constitutes the Open
Internet, and put it in a preamble to a section introducing a more detailed
and ICANN mission specific set of things that adhere to the principles
introduced in the preamble.

The document as it stands contains both kind of definition/description so
it's difficult to agree with it as a whole, i.e. to summarize it in one
piece.

I also think ISOC paper on exactly this topic,
https://www.internetsociety.org/doc/open-internet-what-it-an
d-how-avoid-mistaking-it-something-else-september

provides the right axis for defining our principles: technology, economy,
politics, society.

One thing this paper also does is recognizing that what the technology
"can" do is different from what the user "may" do. The use of "accessible
to all people for all purposes" in the document seems to ignore this fact.




On 2017-08-31 22:44, Marika Konings wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> Hereby attached the updated version of the open internet definition /
> description which incorporates the comments and suggestions that were
> submitted since the last version. As there are a number of definitions
> / descriptions that have been put forward so far, are there any
> volunteers who would like to take a stab at coming up with a draft
> that brings the different perspectives together and addresses the
> different comments and contributions to date which the CCWG could
> review during its next meeting?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> _MARIKA KONINGS_
>
> _Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet
> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) _
>
> _Email: marika.konings at icann.org  _
>
> _ _
>
> _Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO_
>
> _Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses [1]
> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages [2]. _
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso
> [2]
> http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presen
> tations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>
_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20170903/9a38fe93/attachment.html>