[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] lotsa money, was Fwd: Board reply to CCWG-AP

Daniel Dardailler danield at w3.org
Wed Sep 6 12:06:57 UTC 2017


Thx.


On 2017-09-05 20:48, Marika Konings wrote:
> Daniel, you may be interested in the following letter that Akram
> Atallah sent to the RySG (see
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/atallah-to-diaz-29aug17-en.pdf
> [1]) which includes the following paragraph that may answer your
> question:
> 
> _“As you are aware, the 2012 round of the New gTLD Program is still
> underway, and a portion of the remaining funds are required for the
> ongoing operation of the program.  As noted in _
> 
> _ICANN’s FY18 Operating Plan and Budget, ICANN expects to have spent
> approximately $214 million on the Program, including
> “hard-to-predict” costs incurred in FY18 and in the future. To _
> 
> _date, ICANN has spent Program funds on a range of previously
> unforeseen expenses including the formation and coordination of the
> Universal Acceptance Steering Group, Emergency Back_
> 
> _- End Registry Operator Program operations, studies and mitigation
> plans relating to Name Collision, implementation of the Trademark
> Clearinghouse, support for the administration of ICANN Accountability
> Mechanisms, and legal fees and costs relating to the New gTLD Program.
> The remaining Program funds are intended to cover operating expenses
> and future _
> 
> _unanticipated costs such as those listed above, which continue to
> occur on an ongoing basis.   _
> 
> _ _
> 
> _We do not yet know how much of the New gTLD Program remaining funds
> will be required to address future unanticipated expenses, and by
> when. As such, at this time, ICANN is not in a _
> 
> _position to commit to the dispensation of any potential remaining
> funds from the New gTLD Program applications fees.”_
> 
> _ _
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> _ _
> 
> On 9/5/17, 09:24, "ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
> Daniel Dardailler" <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org on behalf
> of danield at w3.org> wrote:
> 
>     On 2017-09-05 17:17, Erika Mann wrote:
> 
>     > Indeed, we don't even need to discuss this topic further.
> 
>     I agree it's out of scope.
> 
>     Can we just be pointed to the place where these application fees
> refund
> 
>     discussions are happening  ? (e.g. in another ICANN group).
> Thanks.
> 
>     >
> 
>     > Erika
> 
>     >
> 
>     > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Jon Nevett <jon at donuts.email>
> wrote:
> 
>     >
> 
>     >> Sean:  No refunds from the auction proceeds were committed to
> or
> 
>     >> anticipated. Not sure where this idea is coming from. Jon
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >> On Sep 5, 2017, at 10:13 AM, Seun Ojedeji
> <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> 
>     >> wrote:
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >> +1 to that Alberto line of reasoning Alberto. Though it will be
> good
> 
>     >> to know if ICANN has indeed legally committed (as per contract)
> to
> 
>     >> provide some refunds from auction proceed.
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >> If that is the case i don't think its something within our
> scope to
> 
>     >> challenge we will just then need to clarify from ICANN how much
> is
> 
>     >> really available and accessible in the auction proceeds
> account.
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >> Regards
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Alberto Soto
> 
>     >> <asoto at ibero-americano.org> wrote:
> 
>     >> do not know how the signed contract is. I do not know if the
> return
> 
>     >> is
> 
>     >> correct. Whoever buys a restaurant and does not get
> profitability
> 
>     >> does so at
> 
>     >> their own risk. Who buys a domain and does not obtain
> profitability,
> 
>     >> does so
> 
>     >> at their own risk. ICANN should not be the guarantee if no
> 
>     >> profitability is
> 
>     >> obtained.
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >> Regards
> 
>     >> Alberto
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >> -----Mensaje original-----
> 
>     >> De: ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org
> 
>     >> [mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org] En nombre de
> Daniel
> 
>     >> Dardailler
> 
>     >> Enviado el: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 6:56 AM
> 
>     >> Para: John R. Levine <johnl at iecc.com>
> 
>     >> CC: ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> 
>     >> Asunto: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] lotsa money, was Fwd: Board
> reply
> 
>     >> to
> 
>     >> CCWG-AP
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >> On 2017-09-04 23:48, John R. Levine wrote:
> 
>     >>>> Is the current financial position of ICANN really an
> impediment
> 
>     >> to
> 
>     >>>> what ICANN wants to do in support of its mission ? I was
> under
> 
>     >> the
> 
>     >>>> impression that ICANN's budget was healthy enough to
> implement
> 
>     >> its
> 
>     >>>> mission optimally today, with also a large untouched pot
> coming
> 
>     >> from
> 
>     >>>> the new gTLD application process (unused legal costs if I
> 
>     >> understand
> 
>     >>>> correctly).
> 
>     >>>
> 
>     >>> Not really.  ICANN's operating budget is fully committed.
> There
> 
>     >> is
> 
>     >>> indeed a lot of unspent new gTLD application money, but it's a
> 
> 
>     >> whole
> 
>     >>> separate can of worms.  It's not ours to spend and since ICANN
> 
> 
>     >> said
> 
>     >>> the price was set to cover their costs, the obvious and
> ethical
> 
>     >> thing
> 
>     >>> to do will be to refund the excess to the applicants.
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >> I kind of agree with the ethical part (although I haven't read
> the
> 
>     >> contract
> 
>     >> those applicants signed and what was promised in writing) but
> is it
> 
>     >> really
> 
>     >> going to be obvious to refund hundreds of applicants, some of
> them
> 
>     >> potentially gone as a business ?
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >>>
> 
>     >>> R's,
> 
>     >>> John
> 
>     >>>
> 
>     >>> PS:
> 
>     >>>> How is it different to give away the funds to the ICANN
> community
> 
>     >>>> (for projects aligned with the ICANN mission) vs. to give
> them
> 
>     >> back
> 
>     >>>> to the board directly, given that the board is driven by the
> 
>     >> community ?
> 
>     >>>
> 
>     >>> Well, actually, it's the board's money to give away, not ours.
> 
> 
>     >> We're
> 
>     >>> just offering them advice.
> 
>     >> _______________________________________________
> 
>     >> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> 
>     >> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> 
>     >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds [1]
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >> _______________________________________________
> 
>     >> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> 
>     >> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> 
>     >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds [1]
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >> --
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>     >> Seun Ojedeji,
> 
>     >> Federal University Oye-Ekiti
> 
>     >> web:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.fuoye.edu.ng&d=DwICAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=9WUkfpEeb3JV26SCznw4e9YHbhh__d2_92nyVxjyndg&s=9MznIFDnihEOW78bpR66Q6Vd6BLg5VLFBsgvQSjx09A&e=
>  [2]
> 
>     >> Mobile: +2348035233535
> 
>     >> _alt email: [3]seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng_
> 
>     >>
> 
>     >> Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your
> 
>     >> action!
> 
>     >
> 
>     >  _______________________________________________
> 
>     > Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> 
>     > Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> 
>     > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds [1]
> 
>     >
> 
>     > _______________________________________________
> 
>     > Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> 
>     > Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> 
>     > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds [1]
> 
>     >
> 
>     >
> 
>     >
> 
>     > Links:
> 
>     > ------
> 
>     > [1] https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
> 
>     > [2]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.fuoye.edu.ng_&d=DwICAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=9WUkfpEeb3JV26SCznw4e9YHbhh__d2_92nyVxjyndg&s=L-SRlqAVXhxWFOssfgjRS66r_eDo0I80OLG6b6siV2s&e=
> 
> 
>     > [3]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__goog-5F1872880453_&d=DwICAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=9WUkfpEeb3JV26SCznw4e9YHbhh__d2_92nyVxjyndg&s=coKy1LT_yi6HxVWED7fqEtTRIfj8i4cSNxXtRGN23y8&e=
> 
> 
>     > _______________________________________________
> 
>     > Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> 
>     > Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> 
>     > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
> 
>     _______________________________________________
> 
>     Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> 
>     Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> 
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/atallah-to-diaz-29aug17-en.pdf)


More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list