[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Fwd: [CORRESPONDENCE] Request for input from ICANN Board - CCWG-AP

Seun Ojedeji seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Sun Oct 7 11:32:52 UTC 2018


+1 it's a reasonable way forward

Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, 12:16 Nadira Alaraj, <nadira.araj at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Erika,
> Your suggestion is very sensible in this short and I support it, however,
> there are few discussion points particularly the need of  board approval of
> the selected slate by the independent panel.
> Best,
> Nadira
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 5:51 PM Erika Mann <erika at erikamann.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Dear All -I'm forwarding you a reply from the Board concerning a
>> question we asked a while ago. The question we asked was the following
>> "What is the Boards perspective on whether ICANN the organization or a
>> constituent part thereof, such as an SO or AC, can be an applicant under
>> any circumstances." The letter brings up some new ideas (project evaluation
>> panel), limits some options of SOs/ACs for potential applications and in 1.
>> b. the Board points out that ICANN would not be required to apply for
>> proceeds (in case there's a need) but would have a "fiduciary obligation to
>> use the funds to meet the organization's obligations". We have to publish
>> our draft report on October 8th, insofar we have no time to discuss this
>> letter and its implications.I therefore recommend the following
>> approach: We add a sentence to the Initial Report under the relevant
>> charter question that says something like “the CCWG received this input
>> (include link) from the ICANN Board in relation to this charter question
>> but has not had time to review or discuss this input. It will do so in
>> conjunction with other input received in response to the public comment
>> period. And, we will annex the letter and/or include it in a footnote. Kind
>> regards,Erika*
>>
>>
>>
>> What if we just
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Wendy Profit <wendy.profit at icann.org>
>> Date: Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 6:45 PM
>> Subject: [CORRESPONDENCE] Request for input from ICANN Board - CCWG-AP
>> To: "erika at erikamann.com" <erika at erikamann.com>, 喬敬 <chiao at brandma.co>
>> Cc: Maarten Botterman <maarten.botterman at board.icann.org>, Becky Burr <
>> becky.burr at board.icann.org>, Correspondence <Correspondence at icann.org>,
>> Secretary <secretary at icann.org>, Board Ops Team <board-ops-team at icann.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> Dear Erika Mann and Ching Chiao,
>>
>>
>>
>> Please find the attached letter from Maarten Botterman and Becky Burr in
>> response to the request for input from the Cross-Community Working Group on
>> New gTLD Auction Proceeds (CCWG-AP).
>>
>>
>>
>> You may expect the letter to be posted shortly to the ICANN
>> Correspondence page: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/correspondence
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you and best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Wendy Profit
>>
>> ICANN – Senior Manager, Board Operations
>>
>> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>>
>> Los Angeles, CA 90094
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20181007/05ba1871/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list