[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Fwd: [CORRESPONDENCE] Request for input from ICANN Board - CCWG-AP

[asoto at ibero-americano.org]

I agree
Regards

Alberto Soto

El 2018-10-07 04:32, 'Tola Sogbesan escribió:
> Having been following this discourse, the Board response is fine with
> me. Although I reckon listening to diverse perspectives in a meeting
> could bring about changes.
> 
> Tola
> 
>> On 6 Oct 2018, at 22:17, John R Levine <johnl at taugh.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Sat, 6 Oct 2018, Elliot Noss wrote:
>> 
>>> a fine approach in my opinion.
>> 
>> Under the time constraints it seems like the only plausible option.
>> 
>> We can figure out later if there's any way that could work without
>> impossible conflict of interest problems.
>> 
>> R's,
>> John
>> 
>> On Oct 6, 2018, at 10:51 AM, Erika Mann <erika at erikamann.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear All -
>> 
>> I'm forwarding you a reply from the Board concerning a question we
>> asked a while ago. The question we asked was the following "What is
>> the Boards perspective on whether ICANN the organization or a
>> constituent part thereof, such as an SO or AC, can be an applicant
>> under any circumstances."
>> 
>> The letter brings up some new ideas (project evaluation panel),
>> limits some options of SOs/ACs for potential applications and in 1.
>> b. the Board points out that ICANN would not be required to apply
>> for proceeds (in case there's a need) but would have a "fiduciary
>> obligation to use the funds to meet the organization's obligations".
>> 
>> We have to publish our draft report on October 8th, insofar we have
>> no time to discuss this letter and its implications.
>> 
>> I therefore recommend the following approach:
>> 
>> We add a sentence to the Initial Report under the relevant charter
>> question that says something like “the CCWG received this input
>> (include link) from the ICANN Board in relation to this charter
>> question but has not had time to review or discuss this input. It
>> will do so in conjunction with other input received in response to
>> the public comment period. And, we will annex the letter and/or
>> include it in a footnote.
>  _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
> 
> ___________________
> Adetola SOGBESAN, M.Sc. Inf. Sys. Mgt. (Liverpool)
> President
> 
> Consulting |ICT4D | Internet Governance | Capacity Building
> www.chacesystems.com [1]  M:     +234 802 290 4983|Twitter:
> @tolasogbesan|Skype: tola-act
> ___________________
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://www.chacesystems.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds