[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Revised review/assessment proposal

[Sam Lanfranco]

In my opinion "overall" works better than "cumulative", which might be misunderstood. 

Sam L

⁣Get BlueMail for Android ​

On Aug. 28, 2019, 16:45, at 16:45, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com> wrote:
>Perhaps an  "overall assessment of approved projects, etc"?... because
>as
>is, it still sounds as if it does the assessment.
>
>To me anyway 🙂
>
>
>
>On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, 10:38 AM Alan Greenberg,
><alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>wrote:
>
>> Attached is the final version. In response to Becky's comment, I have
>> added the word "cumulative" in 3rd APPRP bullet. It now reads:
>>
>> The prime function of the APPRP will be to perform an annual review
>> (starting at the end of year 2) of the ongoing operational process
>> including an assessment of approved projects vs auction proceeds
>goals and
>> an *cumulative* assessment of the success of funded projects (based
>on
>> interim and final assessments provided to the APPRP).
>>
>>
>> This hopefully makes it clear that the APPRP is not actually
>assessing
>> project success but is looking at the cumulative or average success
>of the
>> entire project portfolio.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> At 26/08/2019 05:43 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>>
>> I'll do a revision once a few more comments come
>> it, but will make it VERY clear that the APPRP
>> will not evaluate specific projects. As an aside,
>> if the APPRP feels that the Mechanism is not
>> doing proper project result evaluation, that
>> would be a dandy reason to suggest an APPAP.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> At 26/08/2019 05:29 PM, Becky Burr wrote:
>> >I think it is fine for APPRP to use the
>> >individual assessments provided by experts to
>> >measure the overall success of the program, but
>> >very concerned about any evaluation of
>> >individual projects by the APPRP.  I am
>> >concerned that Sam’s language below leaves that door open.
>> >
>> >From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds
>> ><ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on
>> >behalf of Sam Lanfranco <sam at lanfranco.net>
>> >Date: Monday, August 26, 2019 at 5:15 PM
>> >To: Becky Burr <becky.burr at board.icann.org>,
>> >Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>> >Cc: CCWG Auction Proceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>> >Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Revised review/assessment
>proposal
>> >
>> >
>> >Becky’s comments touch on an area that may
>> >need better clarity.  This is the start of a new
>> >undertaking and the annual review wording might
>> >be cast slightly differently. Something like:
>> >
>> >   *   The prime function of the APPRP will be
>> > to perform an annual review, starting at the
>> > end of year 2. The first annual review will
>> > focus on Mechanism development and an
>> > assessment of approved projects relative to
>> > auction proceeds goals. Subsequent reviews will
>> > include an assessment of funded projects, based
>> > on interim and final assessments provided to the APPRP.
>> >
>> >   *   The APPRP will focus on the Mechanism in
>> > terms of its operational performance and the
>> > auction proceeds goals. It will not investigate
>> > individual projects beyond what is provided in
>> > the assessments provided to the APPRP.
>> >Casting the wording something like this (a)
>> >distinguishes between the initial assessment and
>> >subsequent assessments, and (b) limits
>> >individual project assessment to evidence
>> >“provided to the APPRP†. That does leave
>> >open the question of who provides that evidence.
>> >I assume that is the project recipient’s own
>> >self reporting, with the Mechanism responsible
>> >for assessing the quality of the reporting.
>> >Sam L
>> >On 8/26/2019 4:07 PM, Becky Burr wrote:
>> >I am having a little trouble reconciling this:
>> >
>> >
>> >   *   The prime function of the APPRP will be
>> > to perform an annual review (starting at the
>> > end of year 2) of the ongoing operational
>> > process including an assessment of approved
>> > projects vs auction proceeds goals and an
>> > assessment of the success of funded projects
>> > (based on interim and final assessments provided to the APPRP).
>> >with this:
>> >
>> >   *   For avoidance of doubt, the APPRP will
>> > focus on the overall operation of the Mechanism
>> > and will not evaluate the success of individual
>> > funded projects, although the APPRP may take
>> > into consideration such evaluations performed by the Mechanism.
>> >In the first bullet, perhaps it would be clearer
>> >to say "an assessment of the overall success of the program"?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>> _______________________________________________
>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
>your
>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list
>accordance
>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy)
>and
>> the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos).
>You
>> can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery
>or
>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>> _______________________________________________
>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
>your
>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list
>accordance
>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy)
>and
>> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You
>can
>> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery
>or
>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20190828/c4220b47/attachment-0001.html>