[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Revised review/assessment proposal

[Vanda Scartezini]

For me not an English native, cumulative sounds clear enough since is a latin origin word

Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.





From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Judith Hellerstein <judith at jhellerstein.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 18:41
To: Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
Cc: CCWG Auction Proceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Revised review/assessment proposal

Hi Maureen

Good addition. I agree
Best
Judith
Sent from my iPhone
Judith at jhellerstein.com<mailto:Judith at jhellerstein.com>
Skype ID:Judithhellerstein

On Aug 28, 2019, at 4:45 PM, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com<mailto:maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>> wrote:
Perhaps an  "overall assessment of approved projects, etc"?... because as is, it still sounds as if it does the assessment.

To me anyway 🙂


On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, 10:38 AM Alan Greenberg, <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>> wrote:
Attached is the final version. In response to Becky's comment, I have added the word "cumulative" in 3rd APPRP bullet. It now reads:


The prime function of the APPRP will be to perform an annual review (starting at the end of year 2) of the ongoing operational process including an assessment of approved projects vs auction proceeds goals and an cumulative assessment of the success of funded projects (based on interim and final assessments provided to the APPRP).

This hopefully makes it clear that the APPRP is not actually assessing project success but is looking at the cumulative or average success of the entire project portfolio.

Alan


At 26/08/2019 05:43 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:


I'll do a revision once a few more comments come
it, but will make it VERY clear that the APPRP
will not evaluate specific projects. As an aside,
if the APPRP feels that the Mechanism is not
doing proper project result evaluation, that
would be a dandy reason to suggest an APPAP.

Alan

At 26/08/2019 05:29 PM, Becky Burr wrote:
>I think it is fine for APPRP to use the
>individual assessments provided by experts to
>measure the overall success of the program, but
>very concerned about any evaluation of
>individual projects by the APPRP.  I am
>concerned that Sam’s language below leaves that door open.
>
>From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds
><ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org>> on
>behalf of Sam Lanfranco <sam at lanfranco.net<mailto:sam at lanfranco.net>>
>Date: Monday, August 26, 2019 at 5:15 PM
>To: Becky Burr <becky.burr at board.icann.org<mailto:becky.burr at board.icann.org>>,
>Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>>
>Cc: CCWG Auction Proceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>>
>Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Revised review/assessment proposal
>
>
>Becky’s comments touch on an area that may
>need better clarity.  This is the start of a new
>undertaking and the annual review wording might
>be cast slightly differently. Something like:
>
>   *   The prime function of the APPRP will be
> to perform an annual review, starting at the
> end of year 2. The first annual review will
> focus on Mechanism development and an
> assessment of approved projects relative to
> auction proceeds goals. Subsequent reviews will
> include an assessment of funded projects, based
> on interim and final assessments provided to the APPRP.
>
>   *   The APPRP will focus on the Mechanism in
> terms of its operational performance and the
> auction proceeds goals. It will not investigate
> individual projects beyond what is provided in
> the assessments provided to the APPRP.
>Casting the wording something like this (a)
>distinguishes between the initial assessment and
>subsequent assessments, and (b) limits
>individual project assessment to evidence
>“provided to the APPRP†. That does leave
>open the question of who provides that evidence.
>I assume that is the project recipient’s own
>self reporting, with the Mechanism responsible
>for assessing the quality of the reporting.
>Sam L
>On 8/26/2019 4:07 PM, Becky Burr wrote:
>I am having a little trouble reconciling this:
>
>
>   *   The prime function of the APPRP will be
> to perform an annual review (starting at the
> end of year 2) of the ongoing operational
> process including an assessment of approved
> projects vs auction proceeds goals and an
> assessment of the success of funded projects
> (based on interim and final assessments provided to the APPRP).
>with this:
>
>   *   For avoidance of doubt, the APPRP will
> focus on the overall operation of the Mechanism
> and will not evaluate the success of individual
> funded projects, although the APPRP may take
> into consideration such evaluations performed by the Mechanism.
>In the first bullet, perhaps it would be clearer
>to say "an assessment of the overall success of the program"?


_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20190828/70441b2f/attachment-0001.html>