[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Revised review/assessment proposal
enoss at tucows.com
Thu Aug 29 12:08:27 UTC 2019
I do want you all to know I am still following along. This is all WAY TOO MUCH in my view (both experts on review and this de minimis role for the community wrapped in another convoluted process) but I respect others opinions and efforts.
If others agree with me I would love to hear, just to know I am not alone. I am also not sure if we are now not down to a very small group that is still playing along.
> On Aug 28, 2019, at 5:45 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com> wrote:
> agree with Maureen and Sam.
> cumulative could be read to mean that each project is reviewed. NOT what we are agreeing on.
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds