[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Revised review/assessment proposal
marilynscade at hotmail.com
Thu Aug 29 13:23:53 UTC 2019
Elliot, can you clarify what you mean by "playing along".
I am a little challenged by that comment, given the amount of time that I devote to this CCWG.
From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Elliot Noss <enoss at tucows.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:08 AM
To: CCWG Auction Proceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Revised review/assessment proposal
I do want you all to know I am still following along. This is all WAY TOO MUCH in my view (both experts on review and this de minimis role for the community wrapped in another convoluted process) but I respect others opinions and efforts.
If others agree with me I would love to hear, just to know I am not alone. I am also not sure if we are now not down to a very small group that is still playing along.
On Aug 28, 2019, at 5:45 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com<mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>> wrote:
agree with Maureen and Sam.
cumulative could be read to mean that each project is reviewed. NOT what we are agreeing on.
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds