[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER: Due 19 July - review updated draft Final Report and outstanding questions

Becky Burr BBurr at hwglaw.com
Tue Jul 16 17:00:19 UTC 2019


FWIW, the Board has been clear that it believes:


-  neither the Board nor Org should play a decision-making role with respect to individual applications

-  evaluations and selection must be done by a completely independent panel.  Emphasis on completely independent.


J. Beckwith Burr

HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS LLP

1919 M Street NW/8th Floor

Washington DC 20036

202.730.1316 (P) 202.352.6367 (M)


________________________________
From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of elliot noss <enoss at tucows.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 11:25:59 AM
To: Erika Mann
Cc: ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER: Due 19 July - review updated draft Final Report and outstanding questions

I don’t want to fork the thread but my point is that I believe we have done so (twice) and it is A with community decision-making.

EN

> On Jul 16, 2019, at 9:47 AM, Erika Mann <erika at erikamann.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Elliot -
>
> I understand your point but, please keep in mind, we’re at the end of the process.
>
> We have to make up our mind about:
> A) do want to recommend a single mechanism or,
> B) do we want to recommend a hierarchy of mechanisms and let others then take the final decision.
>
> I rather prefer that we can make a single recommendation instead of three ... but, well, let’s discuss it (again).
>
> Thanks,
> Erika
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 16, 2019, at 2:59 PM, Elliot Noss <enoss at tucows.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for calling that out. Both times through the document I was jumping around.
>>
>> The point about preferring simply that to a relationship with an external body, which I believe was clear consensus, does remain.
>>
>> EN
>>
>>> On Jul 16, 2019, at 8:14 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Elliot,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your message and your review. The following text is included on page 21 in response to charter question 3:
>>>
>>> “Regardless of which mechanism is chosen, an independent evaluation panel would be established and responsible for the review and evaluation of applications. Neither the Board nor staff will be taking decisions on individual applications but will instead focus its consideration of the slate on whether the rules of the process were followed by the independent panel. However, due care will need to be given during the implementation phase that safeguards are in place to ensure the independence of the members of the independent evaluation panel.”
>>>
>>> Erika and Alan are working on some additional proposed text in that same section to provide additional detail on the role of the community. There is currently a placeholder on page 21 for that text. If you would like to contribute to that work, I’m sure they would welcome your input, noting that there will be an opportunity for the full CCWG to “fine tune” that text once they have circulated it.
>>>
>>> I hope this is helpful.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Emily
>>>
>>> From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Elliot Noss <enoss at tucows.com>
>>> Date: Tuesday, 16 July 2019 at 13:49
>>> To: "ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER: Due 19 July - review updated draft Final Report and outstanding questions
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I feel like I have lost the plot. Further, I feel like I am making the same points over repeatedly.
>>>
>>> I believe that we have repeatedly discussed and agreed through the process that the preferred approach was:
>>>
>>> * have the review and decisions on awards made by members of the community sitting in a group (how this is selected is tbd).
>>>
>>> * not have staff perform this function.
>>>
>>> This will be, to my recollection, the third time I have raised this as at odds with a written report. Every time I raise this issue in a meeting there is broad agreement and no one on the other side. If feels to me like the report reads:
>>>
>>> * staff will perform this function with an external organization as a partner.
>>>
>>> Did something dramatic happen in Marrakech that overturned nearly two years of discussions? Again, I feel lost. Please help.
>>>
>>> EN
>>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2019, at 9:22 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> As a reminder, the deadline to review the draft Final Report and questions for input is Friday, 19 July. Please find the documents attached and additional details below.
>>>
>>> Please also find attached high-level notes from our face-to-face meeting at ICANN65, which may assist in your review. The transcript of the meeting is available here:https://65.schedule.icann.org/meetings/1058268 [65.schedule.icann.org]
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Emily
>>>
>>> From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
>>> Date: Friday, 28 June 2019 at 17:20
>>> To: "ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>>> Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated draft Final Report and outstanding questions
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> Following the new gTLD Auction Proceeds meeting that took place on Wednesday 26 June, please find attached for your review the latest version of the draft Final Report. Also attached you will find the questions for CCWG input which have been updated to reflect the items that were discussed and/or resolved during Wednesday’s meeting.
>>>
>>> As a reminder, you are expected to review the draft Final Report as well as the questions for input by Friday, 19 July at the latest. By that date, you are expected to:
>>>
>>>      • Have identified any issues that require further CCWG consideration or discussion that were not already been flagged in the questions document;
>>>      • Have reviewed the issues and questions identified in the questions document that were not considered during Wednesday’s meeting and flag which ones of these do need further consideration and/or provide responses to these questions that the CCWG should consider further;
>>>      • Have provided any edits to the draft Final Report (minor edits like grammar corrections can be sent directly to staff, any substantive edits should be shared with the list).
>>>
>>> As a reminder, the next new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting will be scheduled for 31 July at 14.00 UTC.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Marika
>>>
>>> Marika Konings
>>> Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>> Email: marika.konings at icann.org
>>>
>>> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
>>> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.
>>>
>>> <new gTLD AP CCWG Draft Final Report - updated 28 June 2019 .docx><CCWG Questions - Draft Final Report - updated 28 June 2019.docx>_______________________________________________
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwICAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=vEoSYJ_E6EIxER7Zy7aETPx2_3mxXMuCHSnTM-tD_9M&s=6Hh-Wgb2x3svtlwfDFt4KCjvFDE9xOO8GyiMoKxPXWY&e= ) and the website Terms of Service (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_tos&d=DwICAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=vEoSYJ_E6EIxER7Zy7aETPx2_3mxXMuCHSnTM-tD_9M&s=yy8uYuOCGwXztxl0IstFFo9ddLDuW7Hzu7PEl0YMWJg&e= ). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.<CCWG AP meeting notes - ICANN65 F2F - 26 June 2019.docx>_______________________________________________
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org]) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org]). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>>>
>>> <new gTLD AP CCWG Draft Final Report - updated 28 June 2019 .docx>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>> _______________________________________________
>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.



More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list