<html><head><title>Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] [Ext] F2f planned in Copenhagen ?</title>
</head>
<body>
<span style=" font-family:'Georgia'; font-size: 10pt;">Hola Daniel, Marika, <br>
<br>
I support this, maybe it is still possible to have a longer meeting time. <br>
<br>
Dietmar Stefitz<br>
<br>
Saturday, February 4, 2017, 10:27:16 AM, you wrote:<br>
<br>
<span style=" font-family:'courier new'; font-size: 9pt; color: #800000;"><b>DD> On 2017-02-02 19:13, Marika Konings wrote:<br>
<span style=" color: #800080;">>> Hi Daniel,<br>
<br>
>> Staff has tentatively requested Wednesday from 15.15 – 16.45 local<br>
>> time for a CCWG-Auction Proceeds meeting. It is up to the CCWG to<br>
>> decide whether or not you want to make use of that slot, but it is<br>
>> easier to cancel the slot than to request one at a later date.<br>
<br>
<span style=" color: #800000;">DD> I'll be there as well.<br>
<br>
DD> I'm a bit surprised by seeing only 90 minutes allocated for a f2f. I <br>
DD> hardly see how we can discuss, let alone resolve, more than a couple of<br>
DD> issues in this timeframe, especially since it's our first f2f, so lots<br>
DD> of "get to know each other" overhead.<br>
<br>
DD> Or maybe I'm confused and this f2f will not be a working group meeting<br>
DD> (making progress on our issue list) but more of a report to the <br>
DD> community kind of event ?<br>
<br>
<br>
DD> Related to ICANN WG f2f, I have a few questions.<br>
<br>
DD> So far, I haven't seen any dramatic difference in the way this group is<br>
DD> run vs. a W3C working group developping a technical specification. We <br>
DD> also have teleconfs, we have email exchanges (and documents being edited<br>
DD> in parallel), but all our WG f2f are at least one full day, sometimes 2<br>
DD> or 3 days long. And they usually have 3 of those per year (besides those<br>
DD> held at our plenary). IETF is similar I think.<br>
<br>
DD> The rationale is that f2f, given their higher communication bandwidth,<br>
DD> are where most progress are made in resolving issues, and also that of<br>
DD> course it costs a lot of money to gather 20 experts in one location, so<br>
DD> better use their time effectively.<br>
<br>
DD> Maybe there is a difference between a f2f run as part of an ICANN <br>
DD> plenary, and an isolated WG f2f ?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<span style=" color: #800080;">>> Best regards,<br>
<br>
>> Marika<br>
<br>
>> On 2/2/17, 12:07 PM, "Daniel Dardailler" <</span></span></span></b></span></span><a style=" font-family:'courier new'; font-size: 9pt;" href="mailto:danield@w3.org">danield@w3.org</a><span style=" font-family:'courier new'; font-size: 9pt; color: #800080;"><b>> wrote:<br>
<br>
>> With ICANN 58 a couple of months away, I suppose that like me, <br>
>> people<br>
>> need to arrange travel (or not) to Denmark.<br>
<br>
>> Do we already know if we're going to meet, and which day ?<br>
>> And if we don't know yet, when will we know ?<br>
<br>
>> Thanks.<br>
<br>
<span style=" color: #800000;">DD> _______________________________________________<br>
DD> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list<br>
</span></b></span><a style=" font-family:'courier new'; font-size: 9pt;" href="mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org">DD> Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org</a><br>
<a style=" font-family:'courier new'; font-size: 9pt;" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds">DD> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<span style=" font-family:'arial'; color: #c0c0c0;"><i>-- <br>
Saludos,<br>
Dietmar <br>
</body></html>