<html>
<body>
Two changes for the consideration of the DT. Alan<br><br>
At 19/10/2017 10:59 AM, Marika Konings wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Dear All,<br>
<br>
Please find below the notes and action items from today’s CCWG meeting.
Please take particular note of the action items and associated
deadlines.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Marika<br>
<br>
<b>Notes & Action Items – new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Meeting on
19 October 2017<br>
<br>
</b><i>These high-level notes are designed to help the CCWG navigate
through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the
transcript and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided
separately and are posted on the wiki at:
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_DLHDAw&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=4zHolvsBo6lsC2fsFnhbQd0l8fVzyqdj0t9oV6_NWjM&s=-vuUpZTVZXrpFcq3-nA--Ltl_ESCT71X4cBhx3axkEY&e=">
https://community.icann.org/x/DLHDAw</a>.<br>
</i> <br>
1. Roll Call
<ul>
<li>Attendance will be taken from Adobe Connect
<li>Please state your name before speaking and remember to mute your
mics/computers when not speaking
</ul> <br>
2. Welcome / DOI
<ul>
<li>Please remember to keep your DOI/SOI up to date
</ul> <br>
3. Review of open and interoperable Internet description
<ul>
<li>A number of comments were received following the circulation of the
proposed draft by the Drafting Team earlier this week
<li>Some updates have already been made in response to the comments made
(see version up on the screen during meeting), but additional comments
were received since then.
<li>CCWG requested to review latest version and encouraged to provide
input on open issues (highlighted in yellow) as well as any other issues
people may want to flag.
</ul> <br>
<b>Action item #1</b>: CCWG to review latest version and provide comments
/ input (see attached) by COB on Sunday 22 Oct.<br>
<b>Action item #2</b>: DT to review / address remaining comments and
share proposed final version in time for final review by CCWG at next
meeting (at ICANN60).<br>
<br>
4. Review of examples (see
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zQ66hCxrboAJPKeuU6nHwzHQwmU6g_3kS0JUSSC_tSk/edit[docs.google.com])
<ul>
<li>See summary document circulated on mailing list yesterday
<li>Note that proposed draft CCWG conclusion is currently based on fairly
limited input so important for all to review to make sure it aligns with
the CCWG's perspective
<li>Idea is to share the CCWG conclusions with board & staff liaisons
to obtain their input and assess whether there is alignment between the
perspectives on what is deemed consistent with ICANN's mission.
</ul> <br>
<b>Action item #3</b>: Staff to upload latest version as Google Doc and
share as Word doc<br>
<b>Action item #4</b>: CCWG to review proposed CCWG conclusions re.
examples identified and provide feedback before start of ICANN60. <br>
<br>
5. Next steps in relation to charter question 7 ‘(‘Should ICANN
oversee the solicitation and evaluation of proposals, or delegate to or
coordinate with another entity, including, for example, a foundation
created for this purpose?’)
<ul>
<li>Based on the presentation during the last meeting, there are three
different scenarios that are to be considered but it is deemed too early
to make a preliminary determination as further details is needed.
<li>Consider running another survey to ask CCWG to indicate preference at
this point in time to help inform deliberations (not to come to
preliminary agreement at this stage) and ask to identify what the main
criteria are to make a final determination at a later point in time (for
example, overall cost to ICANN or ability to provide oversight by
ICANN).
<li>All three scenarios would be considered as mechanisms are considered
in the next phase of the work. Once further details are available as a
result of further deliberations, another survey could be conducted to
help inform a final decision.
</ul> <br>
<b>Action item #5</b>: Staff to run short survey to obtain further input
on this question. <br>
<br>
6. Planning for ICANN60
<ul>
<li>In order to take full advantage of the F2F time and recognising that
the CCWG is ready to embark on the next phase of its work (phase 3 -
Compile list of possible mechanisms that could be considered by CCWG),
set up first session as a whiteboarding exercise to flesh out the
different possible mechanism, incl. pros/cons, criteria, etc.
<li>Erika has taken a first stab at developing a skeleton framework for
the whiteboarding session. Skeleton framework will be shared shortly
after the meeting for CCWG input prior to ICANN60.
<li>Staff will aim to summarize input from first session for review at
second session, noting that no final decisions or determinations will be
made at ICANN60 as not everyone may be available to participate.
<li>This exercise is intended to inform which mechanisms would be
considered in further detail during the next phase of work in which the
charter questions are to be answered from the perspective of the
different mechanism(s) the CCWG agrees to pursue further.
</ul> <br>
<b>Action item #6</b>: Staff to circulate skeleton framework to CCWG for
input prior to ICANN60<br>
<br>
7. Confirm next steps and next meetings (Thursday 02 November 2017 -
8:45– 10:15 Working Grouup F2F Meeting in Hall B Section B/C and 13:30 –
15:00 WWorking Group F2F Meeting in Hall B Section B/C)<br>
<br>
<b><i>Marika Konings<br>
</b>Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) <br>
Email:
<a href="mailto:marika.konings@icann.org">marika.konings@icann.org</a>
<br>
<br>
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO<br>
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our
<a href="http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso">interactive courses</a> and
visiting the
<a href="http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers">
GNSO Newcomer pages</a>. <br>
</i> <br>
Content-Type:
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document;<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>
name="ICANN - Open Internet definition working group discussion 19
Oct 17 -"<br>
comments in TC.docx"<br>
Content-Description: ICANN - Open Internet definition working group
discussion<br>
19 Oct 17 - comments in TC.docx<br>
Content-Disposition: attachment;<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>
filename="ICANN - Open Internet definition working group discussion
19 Oct 17"<br>
- comments in TC.docx"; size=21722;<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>
creation-date="Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:59:58 GMT";<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>
modification-date="Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:59:58 GMT"<br>
Content-ID:
<1701BF7229858141A43A306F55980BCA@pexch112.icann.org><br>
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>
1;YQXPR0101MB1589;27:dTZmOpLHos/jKXnFpjY95RKqZR1MoYUe7LbA7c8EFsYO7wd5gyb0NbRNSIxAeZyaqYo5SI2j+aoBVIGuyvdpcX3jAlMTON2Jp+51ADRxE1e3k1QVk0F8VZuNiLYAeNGG<br>
<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit<br>
Content-Disposition: inline<br>
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:<br>
<x-tab> </x-tab>
1;YQXPR0101MB1589;27:dTZmOpLHos/jKXnFpjY95RKqZR1MoYUe7LbA7c8EFsYO7wd5gyb0NbRNSIxAeZyaqYo5SI2j+aoBVIGuyvdpcX3jAlMTON2Jp+51ADRxE1e3k1QVk0F8VZuNiLYAeNGG<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list<br>
Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds" eudora="autourl">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds</a>
</blockquote></body>
</html>