<div dir="ltr">Sam - <div><br></div><div>Not sure what you mean with your first two sentences but I see all three mechanism as good options, though model B) is maybe the most complex one. Additionally, Mechanism A) and even C) could always decide to work with another entity with regard to specific projects. Insofar Mechanism B) could survive in different forms in the future. </div><div><br></div><div>Thank you, </div><div>Erika</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 3:46 PM Sam Lanfranco <<a href="mailto:sam@lanfranco.net">sam@lanfranco.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Erika,</p>
<p>Okay, when I make such observations, I am not like a dog with a
bone. I don't hang on to them for dear lilfe. <br>
</p>
<p>After discussion, more evidence and logic, I can even vote
against what I put on the table.</p>
<p>Sam <br>
</p>
<div>On 12/18/2019 11:33 PM, Erika Mann
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
Sam - let’s keep it as it is, the language reflects reality. We
have a consensus call after the next Public Comment period and,
hopefully by then, all members are going to have consulted with
their constituents are are able to vote.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Kind regards,</div>
<div>Erika <br>
<div><br>
<div id="gmail-m_8789746083499326047AppleMailSignature" dir="ltr">Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
On Dec 18, 2019, at 11:10 PM, Sam Lanfranco <<a href="mailto:sam@lanfranco.net" target="_blank">sam@lanfranco.net</a>>
wrote:<font color="#800000">Colleagues, <br>
</font></div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<p><font size="-1" color="#800000">With regard to the fact
that some of the rankings are close, and that nine of
twenty-three participants did not respond, I am not
sure of the best way forward here. Recommending
mechanism A and mechanism B, while not discarding
mechanism C yet, gives little guidance to our other
colleagues with regard to how our deliberations
assessed the relative strengths and weaknesses of the
three mechanisms. Is there any way to up the response
rate? Can we query to find out if poll absence was a
deliberate abstention or an oversight? <br>
</font></p>
<font size="-1"> </font>
<p><font color="#800000"><font size="-1">Sam L.</font> </font><font size="+3"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"></span></font></p>
<p><font size="+3"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"></span></font></p>
<div>On 12/18/2019 1:55 PM, Marika
Konings wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11pt">Sending
on behalf of the CCWG Co-Chairs<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">Dear all,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">Thank you for
those who participated in the indicative poll and
those who submitted comments on the most recent
draft of the proposed Final Report. Attached
please find the results of the indicative poll. As
summarized in the spreadsheet, fourteen members
out of twenty-three members responded. In
addition, eight participants provided their input.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">In response
to the question “Are you of the view that the CCWG
should only recommend one mechanism for ICANN
Board consideration, even if your preferred
mechanism does not come out as the preferred
mechanism of the CCWG overall?”, six members
indicated their preference to recommend the top
two ranked mechanisms to the ICANN Board, five
members indicated their preference to only
recommend 1 mechanism, two members indicated their
preference to recommend all three mechanism and
one member indicated no preference.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">In response
to the ranking, seven members recommended
mechanism A as their preferred mechanism, four
members ranked mechanism B as their preferred
mechanism and three members ranked mechanism C
first. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">After
reviewing these results, the leadership team
believes that the best path forward is to
recommend mechanism A and mechanism B in the
proposed Final Report, but the leadership team is
not discarding mechanism C (an ICANN Foundation)
yet. The attached revision to the proposed Final
Report includes updates based on the most recent
round of comments from members, as well as
revisions in line with the leadership team’s
suggested approach regarding the mechanisms. Note
that the report includes the following text: “As a
number of members did not participate in the
indicative survey it is possible that the outcome
could change as a result of further deliberations,
consideration of input received and consultations
by the members with their respective appointing
organizations.”</span><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:-webkit-standard,serif;color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">The
leadership team proposes that the CCWG review the
poll results, suggested approach, and report
revisions <b>by the end of this week (Friday 20
December)</b> and that we open the public
comment forum on Monday 23 December (see proposed
announcement attached).<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">Thanks in
advance for your review.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">Kind regards,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">Erika and
Ching<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
<a href="mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" target="_blank">Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org</a>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds</a>
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>) and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" target="_blank">Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds</a></span><br>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>By submitting your personal data, you consent to the
processing of your personal data for purposes of
subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the
ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>)
and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>).
You can visit the Mailman link above to change your
membership status or configuration, including
unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation),
and so on.</span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote></div>