<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Anne - </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Concerning this particular topic, we're currently saying the following on page 12: "It is important to note that there are certain differences that apply as a result of the mechanism chosen which are further detailed in the responses to the charter questions in the sections below which have impacted the CCWG’s decision on which mechanism(s) to recommend to the <span class="" id=":3bn.1" tabindex="-1" style="">ICANN</span> Board. In considering these recommendations, the <span class="" id=":3bn.2" tabindex="-1" style="">CCWG</span> anticipates that the <span class="" id=":3bn.3" tabindex="-1" style="">ICANN</span> Board may conduct a feasibility assessment which provides further details on these aspects so that the Board can take an informed decision about supporting the most appropriate mechanism. . . "</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">I hope you can agree that we can keep the current language until we have had a chance to review comments we receive during the Second Public Comment period. The reason is that we don't want to open discussions at this stage again because it would mean we would have to postpone the timing for our Second Public Comment period. The current text covers the language we had discussed in the <span class="" id=":3bn.4" tabindex="-1" style="">CCWG</span> AP but it would make sense for you to offer a new text during the Second Public Comment period. The <span class="" id=":3bn.5" tabindex="-1" style="">CCW</span> AP will have a chance then to discuss your proposal. </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Does this approach work for you?</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Kind regards,</div><div dir="ltr">Erika<br><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 6:16 PM <span class="" id=":3bn.6" tabindex="-1" style="">Aikman</span>-<span class="" id=":3bn.7" tabindex="-1" style="">Scalese</span>, Anne <<span class="" id=":3bn.8" tabindex="-1" style="">AAikman</span>@<span class="" id=":3bn.9" tabindex="-1" style="">lrrc</span>.com> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US">
<div class="gmail-m_9182679345460694129WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">Regarding the language of the Final Report, I would like to propose that the CCWG consider, in connection with its recommendation to the Board to evaluate Mechanisms A and B, adding a sentence stating that the
CCWG in fact <u>recommends</u> that the Board proceed with the contemplated feasibility study for the purpose of evaluating the two mechanisms.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">Thank you,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">Anne<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11pt"> Ccwg-auctionproceeds <<a href="mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Sam Lanfranco<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, December 19, 2019 7:46 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Erika Mann <<a href="mailto:erika@erikamann.com" target="_blank">erika@erikamann.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" target="_blank">ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For final review - proposed CCWG Final Report, indicative poll results and public comment announcement<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif;color:black">[EXTERNAL]</span></strong><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif;color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center">
<hr size="2" width="100%" align="center">
</div>
</div>
<p>Erika,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>Okay, when I make such observations, I am not like a dog with a bone. I don't hang on to them for dear lilfe.
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>After discussion, more evidence and logic, I can even vote against what I put on the table.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>Sam <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 12/18/2019 11:33 PM, Erika Mann wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">Sam - let’s keep it as it is, the language reflects reality. We have a consensus call after the next Public Comment period and, hopefully by then, all members are going to have consulted with their constituents are are able to vote.
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Kind regards,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Erika <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div id="gmail-m_9182679345460694129AppleMailSignature">
<p class="MsoNormal">Sent from my iPhone<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
On Dec 18, 2019, at 11:10 PM, Sam Lanfranco <<a href="mailto:sam@lanfranco.net" target="_blank">sam@lanfranco.net</a>> wrote:<span style="color:maroon">Colleagues,
</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
<div>
<p><span style="font-size:10pt;color:maroon">With regard to the fact that some of the rankings are close, and that nine of twenty-three participants did not respond, I am not sure of the best way forward here. Recommending mechanism A and mechanism B, while
not discarding mechanism C yet, gives little guidance to our other colleagues with regard to how our deliberations assessed the relative strengths and weaknesses of the three mechanisms. Is there any way to up the response rate? Can we query to find out if
poll absence was a deliberate abstention or an oversight? </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-size:10pt;color:maroon">Sam L.</span><span style="color:maroon">
</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 12/18/2019 1:55 PM, Marika Konings wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11pt">Sending on behalf of the CCWG Co-Chairs</span></i><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11pt"> </span></i><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">Dear all,</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">Thank you for those who participated in the indicative poll and those who submitted comments on the most recent draft of the proposed Final Report. Attached please find the results of the indicative
poll. As summarized in the spreadsheet, fourteen members out of twenty-three members responded. In addition, eight participants provided their input.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">In response to the question “Are you of the view that the CCWG should only recommend one mechanism for ICANN Board consideration, even if your preferred mechanism does not come out as the preferred
mechanism of the CCWG overall?”, six members indicated their preference to recommend the top two ranked mechanisms to the ICANN Board, five members indicated their preference to only recommend 1 mechanism, two members indicated their preference to recommend
all three mechanism and one member indicated no preference.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">In response to the ranking, seven members recommended mechanism A as their preferred mechanism, four members ranked mechanism B as their preferred mechanism and three members ranked mechanism C
first. </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">After reviewing these results, the leadership team believes that the best path forward is to recommend mechanism A and mechanism B in the proposed Final Report, but the leadership team is not discarding
mechanism C (an ICANN Foundation) yet. The attached revision to the proposed Final Report includes updates based on the most recent round of comments from members, as well as revisions in line with the leadership team’s suggested approach regarding the mechanisms.
Note that the report includes the following text: “As a number of members did not participate in the indicative survey it is possible that the outcome could change as a result of further deliberations, consideration of input received and consultations by the
members with their respective appointing organizations.”</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">The leadership team proposes that the CCWG review the poll results, suggested approach, and report revisions
<b>by the end of this week (Friday 20 December)</b> and that we open the public comment forum on Monday 23 December (see proposed announcement attached).</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">Thanks in advance for your review.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:153.6pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">Kind regards,</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:black">Erika and Ching</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><br>
<br>
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre><a href="mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" target="_blank">Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org</a><u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds</a><u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>_______________________________________________<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>) and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.<u></u><u></u></pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">_______________________________________________<br>
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" target="_blank">Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>)
and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery
or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<hr>
<font face="Arial" color="Gray" size="1"><br>
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message
or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying
to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
<br>
</font>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div>