<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div id="__MailbirdStyleContent" style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Arial;color: #000000">
Just on process we don't have a selection with caveat provision, so that would become part of a minority statement no?<br><div class="mb_sig"></div><blockquote class="history_container" type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px; margin-top:20px; margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
<p style="color: #AAAAAA; margin-top: 10px;">On 5/7/2020 6:41:47 PM, Judith Hellerstein <judith@jhellerstein.com> wrote:</p><div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<p>HI Erika,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments and Anne's comments as well. Also please
note that At Large Selected Mechanism A but with a caveat. <br>
</p>
<p>ALAC believes that an independent panel, with no connection to or
control by either ICANN Org or the ICANN Board (preferably
contracted to a suitable non-profit or a set of experts in the
field of grant selection and allocation), is a CRITICAL part of
this decision and the ALAC would strongly object and withdraw its
support if that condition changes. <br>
</p>
<p>As we stated in our public comment our support for Mechanism A
hinges on the outsourcing of any selection and awarding of
applications to an independent panel. I do not know if the other
non-At Large people who selected Mechanism A had this caveat but
that was why we went with Mechanism A. I am not sure how you can
convey this in your report but would be good to do this so our
intent and support for A is clear to all<br>
</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Judith<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="80">_________________________________________________________________________
Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
Hellerstein & Associates
3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein
Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517
E-mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Judith@jhellerstein.com">Judith@jhellerstein.com</a> Website: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.jhellerstein.com">www.jhellerstein.com</a>
Linked In: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/">www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/</a>
Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide
</pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/7/2020 1:32 PM, Aikman-Scalese,
Anne wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:5e83871e98084239ba187fac37beaef6@lrrc.com">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Erika et al,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Many thanks for
your work and the ICANN staff work in finalizing this
report.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:#1F497D">Consensus
Level and Possible Need for Minority Statement<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Given that a
total of 7 members voted for a Mechanism other than A (split
votes between B and C), I would say the appropriate level of
consensus is actually Rough Consensus. Seven Member votes
for Mechanisms B and C combined does not mean that the WG
indicated a “strong preference” for Mechanism A. This is
because those voting for Mechanisms B and C were motivated
by a concern for more independence from ICANN org in the
administrative process. In short, there were 7 votes for
Mechanism A and 7 votes for Mechanisms more independent than
A.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">In addition,
one conclusion in the report will need to be considered as
requiring a Minority Statement. The text in question from
Section 4 is as follows:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;font-family: "Arial",sans-serif">Considering
the responses from participants did not significantly change
the direction provided by the CCWG members as one
participant indicated their preference for mechanism A and
three participants indicated their preference for mechanism
B. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Adding together
the votes of the Participants to those of the Members, the
number in favor of Mechanism A is 8 and the number in favor
of Mechanism B is 7. This count demonstrates that among all
those answering the poll, there is clearly NOT a “strong
preference” in those participating for Mechanism A over
Mechanism B. So the statement above is not quite accurate.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">I understand
that Minority Statements are due by May 28 and I will review
this with the CSG.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Thank you,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Anne<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif">
Ccwg-auctionproceeds <<a href="mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org" moz-do-not-send="true">ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Erika Mann<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, May 7, 2020 6:41 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Ccwg-auctionproceeds <<a href="mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" moz-do-not-send="true">ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Ching Chiao <<a href="mailto:ching.chiao@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">ching.chiao@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Fwd: Message for
Erika to send to CCWG today [Subject: CCWG Auction Proceeds
Consensus Call - Deadline 21 May 2020]<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 9.0pt;font-family: "Helvetica",sans-serif;color: black">[EXTERNAL]</span></strong><span style="font-size: 9.0pt;font-family: "Helvetica",sans-serif;color: black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center" align="center"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt">
<hr width="100%" size="2" align="center">
</span></div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt">Dear
all,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;color: black">Thank you to
those who participated in the final poll on
mechanisms. Please find attached the Final Report
reflecting results of the poll (see poll results in
excel format </span><a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/126432332/CCWG%20Auction%20Proceeds%20-%20Final%20Survey%20on%20Mechanisms%20-%20Summary.xlsx?version=1&modificationDate=1588328283000&api=v2" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt">here</span></a><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;color: black">). With 15
members and 4 participants responding, poll results
indicate strong support for mechanism A, followed by
mechanism B with the majority of members supporting
that the CCWG should recommend two mechanisms.
Section 4.7 of the Report and Recommendation #1 have
been updated to reflect this result.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;color: black"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;color: black">Seeing that
there were no additional comments on the last
revision circulated, the leadership team now
considers the Final Report complete. The next step
in the process is for the Co-Chairs to make a
designation of the level of consensus for the
recommendations in the report (see
</span><a href="https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/CCWG+Charter" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;color: black">charter</span></a><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;color: black"> for details,
an excerpt of which is included below).
<b>We believe that the CCWG supports the
recommendations in this report by Consensus.
Consensus is defined as “a position where a small
minority disagrees, but most agree.” If you are a
member of the CCWG and you disagree with this
designation, please respond to the email list no
later than </b></span><b><span style="font-size: 11.0pt">21 May<span style="color:black"> at 23:59 UTC (14 days from
today).</span></span></b><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;color: black">
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><i><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;color: black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><u><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;color: black">Please note
that at this stage, we are not revisiting the
substance of the recommendations or asking you to
state your positions on specific recommendations.
We are requesting a response only if you believe
that the consensus designation is incorrect. If
you would like to submit a minority viewpoint on
the content of the recommendations,
</span></u><u><span style="font-size: 11.0pt">you may
do so, but this is separate from the consensus
call. Minority statements will be due 28 May<span style="color:black"> at 23:59 UTC (21 days from
today).
</span>Minority statements may be included in an
annex to the Final Report or linked from the Final
Report to the wiki, depending on the length and
number of statements received.</span></u><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;color: black"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;color: black">Please also
find attached a draft cover letter to send to the
Chartering Organizations with the Final Report.
<b>If you have questions or comments on this draft
letter, please send to the</b>
<b>email list no later than </b></span><b><span style="font-size: 11.0pt">21 May<i><span style="color:black">
</span></i><span style="color:black">at 23:59
UTC (14 days from today).</span></span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;color: black"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><span style="color:black">We hope you are all well, take
good care and, </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><span style="color:black">kind regards,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><span style="color:black">Erika and Ching</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext
1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><b><i><span style="color:black">Excerpt from the CCWG
Charter regarding Consensus Designation:</span></i></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black">In developing its output, work
plan and any other reports, the CCWG shall seek to
act by consensus. The chair(s) may make a call for
Consensus. If making such a call they should
always make reasonable efforts to involve all
Chartering Organization appointed Members of the
CCWG (or sub-teams, if applicable). The chair(s)
shall be responsible for designating each position
as having one of the following designations:</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;break-inside:avoid;break-after:avoid;word-spacing:0px"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.25in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;break-inside:avoid;break-after:avoid"><i><span style="color:black">a)</span></i><i><span style="font-family:"Helvetica
Neue",serif;color:black"> </span></i><i><span style="font-size: 7.0pt;color: black"> </span><span style="color:black">Full Consensus - a position
where no minority disagrees; identified by an
absence of objection</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.25in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;break-inside:avoid;break-after:avoid"><i><span style="color:black">b)</span></i><i><span style="font-family:"Helvetica
Neue",serif;color:black"> </span></i><i><span style="font-size: 7.0pt;color: black"> </span><span style="color:black">Consensus – a position where a
small minority disagrees, but most agree</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;break-inside:avoid;break-after:avoid;word-spacing:0px"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;break-inside:avoid;break-after:avoid;word-spacing:0px"><i><span style="color:black">In the absence of Full
Consensus, the chair(s) should allow for the
submission of minority viewpoint(s) by the
Chartering Organization appointed members and
these, along with the consensus view, shall be
included in the report.</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;break-inside:avoid;break-after:avoid;word-spacing:0px"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<hr>
<span style="font-size: 8pt;font-family: Arial;color: Gray"><br>
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use
of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the
reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by replying to the sender. The information
transmitted in this message and any attachments may be
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential
use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
<br>
</span>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org">Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds</a>
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>) and the website Terms of Service (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.</pre>
</blockquote>
</div></blockquote>
</div>