<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="en-BE" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Hi Judith,
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">The CCWG has agreed that the
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Independent Project Applications Evaluation Panel</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">
<span lang="EN-US">will select successful or unsuccessful applicants no matter which mechanism is chosen. This is reflected in the Final Report.<o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">In the CCWG’s response to Charter Question #7 on page 22, the Report states “</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Regardless
of which mechanism is chosen, an Independent Project Applications Evaluation Panel will be established</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">,” and then goes on the describe the details of the panel.
On page 15, the table comparing the different mechanisms also specifies that an Independent Panel will be responsible to “</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Score successful and unsuccessful applicants</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">,”
regardless of the mechanism implemented. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">I hope this addresses your concern. Please let us know if you have additional questions.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Kind regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Emily</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:black">From: </span></b><span style="color:black">Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Judith Hellerstein <judith@jhellerstein.com><br>
<b>Organisation: </b>Hellerstein & Associates<br>
<b>Reply to: </b>"judith@jhellerstein.com" <judith@jhellerstein.com><br>
<b>Date: </b>Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 19:41<br>
<b>To: </b>"ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Fwd: Message for Erika to send to CCWG today [Subject: CCWG Auction Proceeds Consensus Call - Deadline 21 May 2020]<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p>HI Erika,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Thanks for your comments and Anne's comments as well. Also please note that At Large Selected Mechanism A but with a caveat.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>ALAC believes that an independent panel, with no connection to or control by either ICANN Org or the ICANN Board (preferably contracted to a suitable non-profit or a set of experts in the field of grant selection and allocation), is a CRITICAL part of this
decision and the ALAC would strongly object and withdraw its support if that condition changes.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>As we stated in our public comment our support for Mechanism A hinges on the outsourcing of any selection and awarding of applications to an independent panel. I do not know if the other non-At Large people who selected Mechanism A had this caveat but that
was why we went with Mechanism A. I am not sure how you can convey this in your report but would be good to do this so our intent and support for A is clear to all<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Best,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Judith<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_________________________________________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Hellerstein & Associates<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>E-mail: <a href="mailto:Judith@jhellerstein.com">Judith@jhellerstein.com</a> Website: <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.jhellerstein.com&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=v81q67uXA6zqFa1ai-neC4cMiajbDlgsyxYRoEhVccE&s=vIIEx_2kJwKDSmsc93Xzx9B6CxiSdBjYF7U_PBGwJ54&e=">www.jhellerstein.com [jhellerstein.com]</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Linked In: <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jhellerstein_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=v81q67uXA6zqFa1ai-neC4cMiajbDlgsyxYRoEhVccE&s=2QqYwOTPegmZ8aq70-e9YhFg1TECQ1bmesBg4262fE8&e=">www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/ [linkedin.com]</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 5/7/2020 1:32 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Erika et al,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Many thanks for your work and the ICANN staff work in finalizing this report.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:#1F497D">Consensus Level and Possible Need for Minority Statement</span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Given that a total of 7 members voted for a Mechanism other than A (split votes between B and C), I would say the appropriate level of consensus is actually Rough Consensus. Seven Member votes for Mechanisms
B and C combined does not mean that the WG indicated a “strong preference” for Mechanism A. This is because those voting for Mechanisms B and C were motivated by a concern for more independence from ICANN org in the administrative process. In short, there
were 7 votes for Mechanism A and 7 votes for Mechanisms more independent than A.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">In addition, one conclusion in the report will need to be considered as requiring a Minority Statement. The text in question from Section 4 is as follows:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Considering the responses from participants did not significantly change the direction provided by the CCWG members as one participant indicated their preference for mechanism
A and three participants indicated their preference for mechanism B. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Adding together the votes of the Participants to those of the Members, the number in favor of Mechanism A is 8 and the number in favor of Mechanism B is 7. This count demonstrates that among all those answering
the poll, there is clearly NOT a “strong preference” in those participating for Mechanism A over Mechanism B. So the statement above is not quite accurate.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">I understand that Minority Statements are due by May 28 and I will review this with the CSG.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Thank you,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Anne</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Ccwg-auctionproceeds <<a href="mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org">ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Erika Mann<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, May 7, 2020 6:41 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Ccwg-auctionproceeds <<a href="mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org">ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Ching Chiao <<a href="mailto:ching.chiao@gmail.com">ching.chiao@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Fwd: Message for Erika to send to CCWG today [Subject: CCWG Auction Proceeds Consensus Call - Deadline 21 May 2020]</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:black">[EXTERNAL]</span></strong><o:p></o:p></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">
<hr size="0" width="100%" align="center">
</span></div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Dear all,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Thank you to those who participated in the final poll on mechanisms. Please find attached the Final Report reflecting results of the poll
(see poll results in excel format </span><a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/126432332/CCWG%20Auction%20Proceeds%20-%20Final%20Survey%20on%20Mechanisms%20-%20Summary.xlsx?version=1&modificationDate=1588328283000&api=v2" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">here</span></a><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">).
With 15 members and 4 participants responding, poll results indicate strong support for mechanism A, followed by mechanism B with the majority of members supporting that the CCWG should recommend two mechanisms. Section 4.7 of the Report and Recommendation
#1 have been updated to reflect this result.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Seeing that there were no additional comments on the last revision circulated, the leadership team now considers the Final Report complete.
The next step in the process is for the Co-Chairs to make a designation of the level of consensus for the recommendations in the report (see
</span><a href="https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/CCWG+Charter" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">charter</span></a><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black"> for details, an excerpt of which is included below).
<b>We believe that the CCWG supports the recommendations in this report by Consensus. Consensus is defined as “a position where a small minority disagrees, but most agree.” If you are a member of the CCWG and you disagree with this designation, please respond
to the email list no later than </b></span><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">21 May<span style="color:black"> at 23:59 UTC (14 days from today).</span></span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Please note that at this stage, we are not revisiting the substance of the recommendations or asking you to state your positions on
specific recommendations. We are requesting a response only if you believe that the consensus designation is incorrect. If you would like to submit a minority viewpoint on the content of the recommendations,
</span></u><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt">you may do so, but this is separate from the consensus call. Minority statements will be due 28 May<span style="color:black"> at 23:59 UTC (21 days from today).
</span>Minority statements may be included in an annex to the Final Report or linked from the Final Report to the wiki, depending on the length and number of statements received.</span></u><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Please also find attached a draft cover letter to send to the Chartering Organizations with the Final Report.
<b>If you have questions or comments on this draft letter, please send to the</b>
<b>email list no later than </b></span><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">21 May<i><span style="color:black">
</span></i><span style="color:black">at 23:59 UTC (14 days from today).</span></span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><span style="color:black">We hope you are all well, take good care and, </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><span style="color:black">kind regards,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><span style="color:black"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><span style="color:black">Erika and Ching</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><b><i><span style="color:black">Excerpt from the CCWG Charter regarding Consensus Designation:</span></i></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black">In developing its output, work plan and any other reports, the CCWG shall seek to act by consensus. The chair(s) may make a call for Consensus. If making such a call they
should always make reasonable efforts to involve all Chartering Organization appointed Members of the CCWG (or sub-teams, if applicable). The chair(s) shall be responsible for designating each position as having one of the following designations:</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;break-inside:avoid;break-after:avoid;word-spacing:0px">
<i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:18.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;break-inside:avoid;break-after:avoid">
<i><span style="color:black">a) </span></i><i><span style="font-size:7.0pt;color:black"> </span><span style="color:black">Full Consensus - a position where no minority disagrees; identified by an absence of objection</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:18.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;break-inside:avoid;break-after:avoid">
<i><span style="color:black">b) </span></i><i><span style="font-size:7.0pt;color:black"> </span><span style="color:black">Consensus – a position where a small minority disagrees, but most agree</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;break-inside:avoid;break-after:avoid;word-spacing:0px">
<i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;break-inside:avoid;break-after:avoid;word-spacing:0px">
<i><span style="color:black">In the absence of Full Consensus, the chair(s) should allow for the submission of minority viewpoint(s) by the Chartering Organization appointed members and these, along with the consensus view, shall be included in the report.</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;break-inside:avoid;break-after:avoid;word-spacing:0px">
<i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white"><i><span style="color:black"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">
<hr size="0" width="100%" align="center">
</span></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:gray"><br>
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message
or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying
to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
<br>
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org">Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=v81q67uXA6zqFa1ai-neC4cMiajbDlgsyxYRoEhVccE&s=7j5p5V4pDvw1LGG_uNX7nafpERFQoQrf1xoXImIG5yo&e=">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org]</a>) and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_tos&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=v81q67uXA6zqFa1ai-neC4cMiajbDlgsyxYRoEhVccE&s=nNyokjJgyPHmI58M_FW67s_NzAH93b0PeY2Dk-qqAPA&e=">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org]</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.<o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>