[ccwg-internet-governance] [discuss] ICANN proposal for NTIA transition published
wjdrake at gmail.com
Thu Apr 10 07:09:12 UTC 2014
On Apr 9, 2014, at 4:45 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com> wrote:
> For the GNSO, we are not organized in that way.
> The GNSO Council is limited to gTLD policy. Governance of the GNSO is done through Excomms in each SG/Constituency.
This is the view of the CSG. It is not the view or practice of the NCSG, which allows its elected Councilors a good deal of freedom, rarely directs their votes, etc. I wouldn’t attempt to characterize Rgy and Rgr views on the matter.
> I would propose at least one per SG from GNSO, which is 4.
Here I agree, the diversity of interests aggregated into the GNSO’s 4 SGs is simply too great. 2 would mean disenfranchising whole communities, not a good way to proceed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ccwg-internet-governance