[ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: Netmundial leaked docs
trizk at inficron.com
Sat Aug 23 17:55:28 UTC 2014
While I realize that it may seem somewhat exclusive at the moment,
perhaps local communities will be able to get involved in such a way
that it catalyzes a bottom up organization complimentary to ICANN and
representative of other interests. Given that ICANN is a participant, I
would hope that it lends its expertise in that regard. I am not trying
to imply that you are wrong in your concern for transparency, most of
the time your insight is quite sound, and is always appreciated. Just
suggesting a wait and see approach before either contributing or passing
Avri Doria wrote:
> On 21-Aug-14 15:20, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
>> So much for transparency ....
> As a believer in transparency maximalism, I agree.
> But I have there are so many gradations of transparency.
> E.g they could have denied and decried.
> Instead, they created a web site.
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
More information about the ccwg-internet-governance