[ccwg-internet-governance] I-events heads up
marilynscade at hotmail.com
Sat Dec 13 20:51:04 UTC 2014
I am not a fan of a new comms mechanism, as we do not use the ones we have effectively.
Let's start with our list, and return to working conf. calls.
I would prefer that we just have a regular approach to conf. calls and then use the emaillist, to make sure this is also transparent. There are too many options already that are not used, or areoverlapping. And, I am aware that not everyone can use SKYPE.
Irregular communications is not a really good idea for us. We made commitments to do work and we are behind.
It is already short notice to learn about a call on Thursday or Friday, without a longerplanning cycle. I realize that with the holiday, we need to move ahead, but let's return to treatingthis CCWG IG as a priority. NOT to duplicate IANA and Accountability, which have their own CCWGsand will have their own slots during ICANN Singapore, but to do what we committed to do. Organizethe IG session, and do meaningful work on IG.
For instance, I would like to suggest that the CCWG IG discuss the NMI and ICANN's role in IG ecosystemagain, and contribute to broadening the ICANN community understanding of the current activities in IGthat are relevant to ICANN.
While we can provide a broader survey and should, it is also important to recall that while ICANN may be affected by activities in the larger IG ecosystem, it has its own important job to do in improving its own performance of fulfilling its core mission. So, in some cases, knowing what is going on and how it affects ICANN is important, and in some cases, ensuring that ICANN does its day job with excellence and focus will be the best contribution that can be made to ensure support to ICANN.
I am updating my timeline this week end, and can send it to Alex for updating the calendar that CCWG-IGis building.
> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:54:09 +0000
> From: ocl at gih.com
> To: wjdrake at gmail.com
> CC: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] I-events heads up
> Dear Bill,
> answers in-line:
> On 13/12/2014 09:28, William Drake wrote:
> > Hi Olivier
> > Not that any of us needs more Skype channels (or email lists) to follow, but I can’t help wondering——might it make sense for the CWG to have its own to foster intersessional dialogue and planning?
> I am all for that, if participants would find it helpful!
> BTW the I* Heads up channel on Skype is not hosted by this CCWG so there
> might be many announcements that are not in the CCWG's realm but it's
> just another helpful source of data.
> > BTW how are we doing with securing a time slot Wednesday in Singapore? The Board-GAC moving to Wednesday morning does add some density….
> Renate's looking into this; We are trying to avoid clashes. Right now
> Monday afternoon might be the best bet.
> > And there was sentiment at our LA meeting about the CWG being the appropriate organizer of the Internet governance session. Do we intend to follow up with staff on this proposal?
> Yes, we have followed up. No firmed plans yet but hopefully by next week
> we'll know.
> Jordan Carter will shortly follow-up with details of a planning call
> Rafik, him & I had.
> Also -- expect a Doodle shortly for a CCWG on IG call on Thursday 18 or
> Friday 19 December 2014.
> Kindest regards,
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ccwg-internet-governance