[ccwg-internet-governance] Single Root

Stephane Van Gelder Consulting svg at stephanevangelder.com
Thu Feb 13 09:35:23 UTC 2014


I see what you mean Bill, but isn't it sometimes best to shout the most
obvious statements from the rooftops so that no-one is in any doubt as to
what people think?

Best,

Stéphane Van Gelder
Chairman and Managing Director/Fondateur
SVGC.net

T (FR): +33 (0)6 20 40 55 89
T (UK): +44 (0)7583 457053
Skype: SVANGELDER
www.StephaneVanGelder.com
www.svgc.net
----------------
Follow us on Twitter: @stephvg and "like" us on Facebook:
www.facebook.com/DomainConsultant
LinkedIn: fr.linkedin.com/in/domainconsultant/


On 13 February 2014 09:51, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Feb 11, 2014, at 11:50 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Can we close on that: the CCWG reinforces that ICANN is,and must remain
> committed to a single authoriative root?
>
>
> Wouldn't this be sort of like boldly declaring we think the Pope should
> stay Catholic?
>
> Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20140213/addc1ff4/attachment.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list