[ccwg-internet-governance] FW: For your review - revised PI Working Definitions

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Sun Feb 16 13:17:38 UTC 2014


Hi Gregory,

thanks for sharing this, the volunteers for ICANN definition can use in
addition to several suggestions shared previosuly.

Best Regards,

Rafik

2014-02-13 23:55 GMT+09:00 Shatan, Gregory S. <GShatan at reedsmith.com>:

>   All:
>
>
>
> Here is the current draft of the working definitions being prepared by a
> subteam of the GNSO Working Group on Policy and Implementation.  Please
> keep in mind:
>
>
>
> n  This is a draft – a work in progress.
>
> n  It is being prepared by a subteam of the WG
>
> n  It is intended to create “working definitions” to facilitate
> discussion and drafting within the WG
>
>
>
> As such, this is not inteded to be gospel or the position of the WG or
> even the subgroup, much less the GNSO.  Maybe not even intended to be
> shared outside the WG….  However, discussions within the WG do echo those
> here, so this could provide a bit of a shortcut to creating definitions,
> and given time, anything useful should be grist for the mill.
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg at icann.org [mailto:
> owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Marika Konings
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 13, 2014 6:27 AM
> *To:* gnso-policyimpl-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [gnso-policyimpl-wg] For your review - revised PI Working
> Definitions
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> On behalf of the definitions sub-team, please find attached an updated
> version of the proposed working definitions in which the sub-team has aimed
> to address the comments and feedback provided by the Working Group during
> the last meeting.
>
>
>
> As you review this document, please take into account that these working
> definitions have been developed for the limited use by the PI Working group
> as a starting point to facilitate the discussions and deliberations
> outlined in the WG's charter. These definitions are expected to evolve
> during and as a result of the WG deliberations. At the end of the process,
> the WG is expected to review these definitions, add/update as deemed
> appropriate and include them in the Final Report.
>
>
>
> Should you have any comments, proposed edits and/or questions, you are
> strongly encouraged to share these in advance of the next meeting
> (Wednesday 19 February) with the mailing list.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
>
>
> * * *
>
> This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and
> may well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are
> on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and
> then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it
> for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you
> for your cooperation.
>
> * * *
>
> To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you
> that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice
> contained in this communication  (including any attachments) is not
> intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1)
> avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and
> local provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
> party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
>
> Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20140216/ff4b4bbb/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list