[ccwg-internet-governance] Form of contribution to NetMundial
León Felipe Sánchez Ambía
leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
Mon Feb 24 17:36:04 UTC 2014
Please do comment and help me expand and adjust the draft definition on MSH. I’m currently working on a more robust definition as suggested by Olivier and will update on the wiki as soon as I finish it. In the mean time, it would be great if we could work on a common document for MSH. Would it be ok if I open a google doc?
All the best,
El 24/02/2014, a las 10:18, Fares, David <DFares at 21cf.com> escribió:
> Thanks for this Olivier and Patrick. Could someone please explain how the different working groups are supposed to finalize work on their definitions for review by the larger CCWG. I volunteered for 2 work groups but have not received any information on how to proceed. For example, I am on the Working Group to define Multi-Stakeholder and there is a definition in the draft proposed by Leon, should the entire Working Group comment on Leon's proposal? Thank you in advance for any clarification.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Patrik Fältström
> Sent: 24 February 2014 12:27
> To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Form of contribution to NetMundial
> I did some edit and added some text to the document. Keep or throw away :-)
> On 24/02/14 01:46, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>> Dear WG participants,
>> please be so kind to find attached, the first draft of the
>> contribution to NetMundial, as discussed on Friday's call.
>> I have added a few paragraphs which we have already received.
>> I have not yet added Filiz et al.'s draft for Critical Internet Resources.
>> As discussed on the call, it looks like our contribution will need to
>> be into two parts, filing each part with the correct NetMundial Thread:
>> - Part 1: Internet Principles
>> I suggest this includes:
>> - our definitions
>> - our arguments (technical, internet governance, ICANN)
>> - Part 2: Future evolution of the Internet Governance ecosystem I
>> suggest this includes:
>> - our principles for the definition of ICANN's evolving future roadmap
>> The draft attached is a working document. I realise many of you aren't
>> used to working on a WIKI. I also realise that working almost entirely
>> by email is likely to be quite inefficient.
>> Should we create a Google Doc for this, so we can all add, annotate,
>> Please keep those contributions coming in.
>> Kind regards,
>> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments that does not relate to the official business of Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No representation is made that this email or its attachments are without defect.
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ccwg-internet-governance