[ccwg-internet-governance] Form of contribution to NetMundial

Ken Stubbs kstubbs at afilias.info
Tue Feb 25 15:09:47 UTC 2014


I support Marilyn's statement as well

Ken


On 2/25/2014 9:41 AM, James M. Bladel wrote:
> I also agree with Marilyn and Keith.
>
> J.
>
> From: <Drazek>, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>>
> Date: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 at 8:18
> To: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com 
> <mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>>
> Cc: "ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org 
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>" 
> <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org 
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>>
> Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Form of contribution to NetMundial
>
> I support Marilyn's comments and suggestions.
>
> Keith
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 25, 2014, at 1:54 AM, "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade at hotmail.com 
> <mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> I like a couple of phrases from you, Olivier.
>> I will look at the document, but I'd like to propose that we 
>> systematically reinforce that ICANN is a unique bottom up, consensus 
>> based multistakeholder model of policy development, and acceptance by 
>> stakeholders, with a global responsibility for coordinating a shared 
>> space of the unique indicators.
>>
>> That is unique about ICANN, although I note that staff and the CEO 
>> are consistently
>> cutting the 'bottom up/consensus based ' off the MS language.
>>
>> Secondly, transparency is being described as 'adequate'. I think that 
>> is not actually what
>> the community agreed to in ATRT and expects.
>>
>> We must demand not just transparency, but accountability. 
>>  Transparency just means that sometime soon, documents are published. 
>> Or the CEO makes announcements.
>> Accountabiity means that ICANN takes consultation with its community, 
>> and that the Board ensures mechanisms which create inclusion of input 
>> from the affected Stakeholders who work within ICANN [by the way, it 
>> is a way to ensure more do come to ICANN to participate and work], 
>> and taken as an intertwined pair of commitments, it is what can 
>> contribute to ICANN's legitimacy with its own community, including 
>> the GAC members, and more broadly.
>>
>> I would strongly urge that we incorporate the term of Transparency 
>> and Accountability.
>>
>> M
>>
>> > Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:34:18 +0100
>> > From: ocl at gih.com <mailto:ocl at gih.com>
>> > To: DFares at 21cf.com <mailto:DFares at 21cf.com>; 
>> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org 
>> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Form of contribution to 
>> NetMundial
>> >
>> > Dear David,
>> >
>> > in true bottom-up fashion, once you've volunteered for a section, 
>> please
>> > get in touch with other colleagues who have volunteered too for that
>> > same section & put something together between yourselves, then once
>> > you've reached consensus please post it to the CCWG mailing list.
>> >
>> > Would members of this WG prefer an open document Google Doc, so you can
>> > all work on it in your own time and simultaneously?
>> > I know that some are not used to use WIKIs, hence I thought Staff could
>> > eventually transcribe (cut/paste) things to the WIKI prior to a
>> > conference call.
>> >
>> > Kind regards,
>> >
>> > Olivier
>> >
>> > On 24/02/2014 17:18, Fares, David wrote:
>> > > Thanks for this Olivier and Patrick. Could someone please explain 
>> how the different working groups are supposed to finalize work on 
>> their definitions for review by the larger CCWG. I volunteered for 2 
>> work groups but have not received any information on how to proceed. 
>> For example, I am on the Working Group to define Multi-Stakeholder 
>> and there is a definition in the draft proposed by Leon, should the 
>> entire Working Group comment on Leon's proposal? Thank you in advance 
>> for any clarification.
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org 
>> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org> 
>> [mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of 
>> Patrik Fältström
>> > > Sent: 24 February 2014 12:27
>> > > To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org 
>> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>> > > Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Form of contribution to 
>> NetMundial
>> > >
>> > > I did some edit and added some text to the document. Keep or 
>> throw away :-)
>> > >
>> > > Patrik
>> > >
>> > > On 24/02/14 01:46, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>> > >> Dear WG participants,
>> > >>
>> > >> please be so kind to find attached, the first draft of the
>> > >> contribution to NetMundial, as discussed on Friday's call.
>> > >> I have added a few paragraphs which we have already received.
>> > >> I have not yet added Filiz et al.'s draft for Critical Internet 
>> Resources.
>> > >>
>> > >> As discussed on the call, it looks like our contribution will 
>> need to
>> > >> be into two parts, filing each part with the correct NetMundial 
>> Thread:
>> > >>
>> > >> - Part 1: Internet Principles
>> > >> I suggest this includes:
>> > >> - our definitions
>> > >> - our arguments (technical, internet governance, ICANN)
>> > >>
>> > >> - Part 2: Future evolution of the Internet Governance ecosystem I
>> > >> suggest this includes:
>> > >> - our principles for the definition of ICANN's evolving future 
>> roadmap
>> > >>
>> > >> The draft attached is a working document. I realise many of you 
>> aren't
>> > >> used to working on a WIKI. I also realise that working almost 
>> entirely
>> > >> by email is likely to be quite inefficient.
>> > >> Should we create a Google Doc for this, so we can all add, 
>> annotate,
>> > >> comment?
>> > >>
>> > >> Please keep those contributions coming in.
>> > >>
>> > >> Kind regards,
>> > >>
>> > >> Olivier
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>> > >> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org 
>> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>> > >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>> > >>
>> > > This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged 
>> or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named 
>> addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or 
>> responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may 
>> not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. 
>> Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its 
>> attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content 
>> of this message and its attachments that does not relate to the 
>> official business of Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. or its 
>> subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any 
>> of them. No representation is made that this email or its attachments 
>> are without defect.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>> > ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org 
>> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>> _______________________________________________
>> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org 
>> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20140225/b0945690/attachment.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list