[ccwg-internet-governance] Form of contribution to NetMundial

Aparna Sridhar aparnasridhar at google.com
Tue Feb 25 22:15:19 UTC 2014


Everyone,

Attached are some proposed additions and amendments on the topics I agreed
to take on.  Happy to discuss and/or have my language refined by the group.

Aparna Sridhar
Counsel
Google Inc.
1101 New York Avenue N.W.
Second Floor
Washington, DC 20005
tel:  202.346.1261
e-mail: aparnasridhar at google.com


On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:

>  I support Marilyn's comments and suggestions.
>
>  Keith
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 25, 2014, at 1:54 AM, "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>   I like a couple of phrases from you, Olivier.
> I will look at the document, but I'd like to propose that we
> systematically reinforce that ICANN is a unique bottom up, consensus based
> multistakeholder model of policy development, and acceptance by
> stakeholders, with a global responsibility for coordinating a shared space
> of the unique indicators.
>
>  That is unique about ICANN, although I note that staff and the CEO are
> consistently
> cutting the 'bottom up/consensus based ' off the MS language.
>
>  Secondly, transparency is being described as 'adequate'. I think that is
> not actually what
> the community agreed to in ATRT and expects.
>
>  We must demand not just transparency, but accountability.  Transparency
> just means that sometime soon, documents are published. Or the CEO makes
> announcements.
> Accountabiity means that ICANN takes consultation with its community, and
> that the Board ensures mechanisms which create inclusion of input from the
> affected Stakeholders who work within ICANN [by the way, it is a way to
> ensure more do come to ICANN to participate and work], and taken as an
> intertwined pair of commitments, it is what can contribute to ICANN's
> legitimacy with its own community, including the GAC members, and more
> broadly.
>
>  I would strongly urge that we incorporate the term of Transparency and
> Accountability.
>
>  M
>
> > Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:34:18 +0100
> > From: ocl at gih.com
> > To: DFares at 21cf.com; ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> > Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Form of contribution to
> NetMundial
> >
> > Dear David,
> >
> > in true bottom-up fashion, once you've volunteered for a section, please
> > get in touch with other colleagues who have volunteered too for that
> > same section & put something together between yourselves, then once
> > you've reached consensus please post it to the CCWG mailing list.
> >
> > Would members of this WG prefer an open document Google Doc, so you can
> > all work on it in your own time and simultaneously?
> > I know that some are not used to use WIKIs, hence I thought Staff could
> > eventually transcribe (cut/paste) things to the WIKI prior to a
> > conference call.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Olivier
> >
> > On 24/02/2014 17:18, Fares, David wrote:
> > > Thanks for this Olivier and Patrick. Could someone please explain how
> the different working groups are supposed to finalize work on their
> definitions for review by the larger CCWG. I volunteered for 2 work groups
> but have not received any information on how to proceed. For example, I am
> on the Working Group to define Multi-Stakeholder and there is a definition
> in the draft proposed by Leon, should the entire Working Group comment on
> Leon's proposal? Thank you in advance for any clarification.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org<ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org>]
> On Behalf Of Patrik Fältström
> > > Sent: 24 February 2014 12:27
> > > To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> > > Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Form of contribution to
> NetMundial
> > >
> > > I did some edit and added some text to the document. Keep or throw
> away :-)
> > >
> > > Patrik
> > >
> > > On 24/02/14 01:46, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
> > >> Dear WG participants,
> > >>
> > >> please be so kind to find attached, the first draft of the
> > >> contribution to NetMundial, as discussed on Friday's call.
> > >> I have added a few paragraphs which we have already received.
> > >> I have not yet added Filiz et al.'s draft for Critical Internet
> Resources.
> > >>
> > >> As discussed on the call, it looks like our contribution will need to
> > >> be into two parts, filing each part with the correct NetMundial
> Thread:
> > >>
> > >> - Part 1: Internet Principles
> > >> I suggest this includes:
> > >> - our definitions
> > >> - our arguments (technical, internet governance, ICANN)
> > >>
> > >> - Part 2: Future evolution of the Internet Governance ecosystem I
> > >> suggest this includes:
> > >> - our principles for the definition of ICANN's evolving future roadmap
> > >>
> > >> The draft attached is a working document. I realise many of you
> aren't
> > >> used to working on a WIKI. I also realise that working almost
> entirely
> > >> by email is likely to be quite inefficient.
> > >> Should we create a Google Doc for this, so we can all add, annotate,
> > >> comment?
> > >>
> > >> Please keep those contributions coming in.
> > >>
> > >> Kind regards,
> > >>
> > >> Olivier
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> > >> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> > >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
> > >>
> > > This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or
> confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If
> you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
> delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this
> message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete
> this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply
> e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments that does not
> relate to the official business of Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. or its
> subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of
> them. No representation is made that this email or its attachments are
> without defect.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> > ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>  _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20140225/3c33b48d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CCWG IG Netmundial V1 Draft-paf-AS.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 50688 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20140225/3c33b48d/CCWGIGNetmundialV1Draft-paf-AS-0001.doc>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list