[ccwg-internet-governance] Form of contribution to NetMundial

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond ocl at gih.com
Wed Feb 26 00:15:00 UTC 2014


Thanks for these proposals, Aparna. Feedback from others, please?

Kind regards,

Olivier

On 25/02/2014 23:15, Aparna Sridhar wrote:
> Everyone, 
>
> Attached are some proposed additions and amendments on the topics I
> agreed to take on.  Happy to discuss and/or have my language refined
> by the group.
>
> Aparna Sridhar
> Counsel
> Google Inc.
> 1101 New York Avenue N.W.
> Second Floor
> Washington, DC 20005
> tel:  202.346.1261
> e-mail: aparnasridhar at google.com <mailto:aparnasridhar at google.com>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com
> <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>> wrote:
>
>     I support Marilyn's comments and suggestions.
>
>     Keith
>
>     Sent from my iPhone
>
>     On Feb 25, 2014, at 1:54 AM, "Marilyn Cade"
>     <marilynscade at hotmail.com <mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
>>     I like a couple of phrases from you, Olivier.
>>     I will look at the document, but I'd like to propose that we
>>     systematically reinforce that ICANN is a unique bottom up,
>>     consensus based multistakeholder model of policy development, and
>>     acceptance by stakeholders, with a global responsibility for
>>     coordinating a shared space of the unique indicators. 
>>
>>     That is unique about ICANN, although I note that staff and the
>>     CEO are consistently
>>     cutting the 'bottom up/consensus based ' off the MS language.
>>
>>     Secondly, transparency is being described as 'adequate'. I think
>>     that is not actually what
>>     the community agreed to in ATRT and expects. 
>>
>>     We must demand not just transparency, but accountability.
>>      Transparency just means that sometime soon, documents are
>>     published. Or the CEO makes announcements.
>>     Accountabiity means that ICANN takes consultation with its
>>     community, and that the Board ensures mechanisms which create
>>     inclusion of input from the affected Stakeholders who work within
>>     ICANN [by the way, it is a way to ensure more do come to ICANN to
>>     participate and work], and taken as an intertwined pair of
>>     commitments, it is what can contribute to ICANN's legitimacy with
>>     its own community, including the GAC members, and more broadly. 
>>
>>     I would strongly urge that we incorporate the term of
>>     Transparency and Accountability. 
>>
>>     M
>>
>>     > Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:34:18 +0100
>>     > From: ocl at gih.com <mailto:ocl at gih.com>
>>     > To: DFares at 21cf.com <mailto:DFares at 21cf.com>;
>>     ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>>     <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>>     > Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Form of contribution to
>>     NetMundial
>>     >
>>     > Dear David,
>>     >
>>     > in true bottom-up fashion, once you've volunteered for a
>>     section, please
>>     > get in touch with other colleagues who have volunteered too for
>>     that
>>     > same section & put something together between yourselves, then once
>>     > you've reached consensus please post it to the CCWG mailing list.
>>     >
>>     > Would members of this WG prefer an open document Google Doc, so
>>     you can
>>     > all work on it in your own time and simultaneously?
>>     > I know that some are not used to use WIKIs, hence I thought
>>     Staff could
>>     > eventually transcribe (cut/paste) things to the WIKI prior to a
>>     > conference call.
>>     >
>>     > Kind regards,
>>     >
>>     > Olivier
>>     >
>>     > On 24/02/2014 17:18, Fares, David wrote:
>>     > > Thanks for this Olivier and Patrick. Could someone please
>>     explain how the different working groups are supposed to finalize
>>     work on their definitions for review by the larger CCWG. I
>>     volunteered for 2 work groups but have not received any
>>     information on how to proceed. For example, I am on the Working
>>     Group to define Multi-Stakeholder and there is a definition in
>>     the draft proposed by Leon, should the entire Working Group
>>     comment on Leon's proposal? Thank you in advance for any
>>     clarification.
>>     > >
>>     > > -----Original Message-----
>>     > > From: ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org
>>     <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org>
>>     [mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
>>     Patrik Fältström
>>     > > Sent: 24 February 2014 12:27
>>     > > To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond;
>>     ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>>     <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>>     > > Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Form of contribution
>>     to NetMundial
>>     > >
>>     > > I did some edit and added some text to the document. Keep or
>>     throw away :-)
>>     > >
>>     > > Patrik
>>     > >
>>     > > On 24/02/14 01:46, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>>     > >> Dear WG participants,
>>     > >>
>>     > >> please be so kind to find attached, the first draft of the
>>     > >> contribution to NetMundial, as discussed on Friday's call.
>>     > >> I have added a few paragraphs which we have already received.
>>     > >> I have not yet added Filiz et al.'s draft for Critical
>>     Internet Resources.
>>     > >>
>>     > >> As discussed on the call, it looks like our contribution
>>     will need to
>>     > >> be into two parts, filing each part with the correct
>>     NetMundial Thread:
>>     > >>
>>     > >> - Part 1: Internet Principles
>>     > >> I suggest this includes:
>>     > >> - our definitions
>>     > >> - our arguments (technical, internet governance, ICANN)
>>     > >>
>>     > >> - Part 2: Future evolution of the Internet Governance
>>     ecosystem I
>>     > >> suggest this includes:
>>     > >> - our principles for the definition of ICANN's evolving
>>     future roadmap
>>     > >>
>>     > >> The draft attached is a working document. I realise many of
>>     you aren't
>>     > >> used to working on a WIKI. I also realise that working
>>     almost entirely
>>     > >> by email is likely to be quite inefficient.
>>     > >> Should we create a Google Doc for this, so we can all add,
>>     annotate,
>>     > >> comment?
>>     > >>
>>     > >> Please keep those contributions coming in.
>>     > >>
>>     > >> Kind regards,
>>     > >>
>>     > >> Olivier
>>     > >>
>>     > >>
>>     > >>
>>     > >> _______________________________________________
>>     > >> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>>     > >> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>>     <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>>     > >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>>     > >>
>>     > > This message and its attachments may contain legally
>>     privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for
>>     the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in
>>     this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the
>>     addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its
>>     attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this
>>     message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply
>>     e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments that does
>>     not relate to the official business of Twenty-First Century Fox,
>>     Inc. or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or
>>     endorsed by any of them. No representation is made that this
>>     email or its attachments are without defect.
>>     > >
>>     > >
>>     > >
>>     >
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>>     > ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>>     <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>>     > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>>     ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>>     <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>     ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>     <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20140226/1ee38e87/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list