[ccwg-internet-governance] CCWG AND ICANN 51

Nigel Hickson nigel.hickson at icann.org
Mon Sep 29 22:48:22 UTC 2014


Greg 

Good evening; subject to views and input your approach coincides with what
we proposed; for some in Community a brief update (for example on key
proposals tabled for PP-14) might well be useful

Regards 

Nigel 

From:  <Shatan>, "Gregory S." <GShatan at reedsmith.com>
Date:  Monday, September 29, 2014 9:10 PM
To:  Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>, William Drake
<wjdrake at gmail.com>
Cc:  CCWG <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] CCWG AND ICANN 51

I would also support a Town Hall approach.  Some time devoted to updates
(both from ICANN and others) makes sense, so that those who are not living
in the IG space can get brought up to date.  At the same time, we need to
take advantage of the time so that the more advance crowd can have a
dialogue.  Taking all the time with a lowest-common-denominator type of
briefing would be a pity.
 
Greg Shatan
 

From: ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marilyn
Cade
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 1:36 PM
To: William Drake
Cc: CCWG
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] CCWG AND ICANN 51
 

see my suggestion of more of a town hall approach,

 

Lots of us -- myself, Bill, Keith, others, have also expertise in more than
NETmundial, but also i WSIS Review, preparation for ITU Plenipot.

 

As I said, we need to decide if this is one way briefings, or if the CCWG is
about helping ot analye and propose guidance to ICANN.

Sent from my iPad


On Sep 29, 2014, at 9:37 AM, "William Drake" <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
>  
> 
> Glad to see Nigel here and a request for community engagement in planning this
> event.  I guess a meta-question is do we want to continue to do sort
> ³information sessions² in which the audience is updated on external
> developments by serial talking heads or would some other format be potentially
> more interesting?
> 
>  
> 
> I suspect a number of CCWG members might like to participate.  That includes
> me, depending on what we¹re doing.  Having participated in the NMI launch etc.
> and coordinated a lot with different groups around that process more generally
> I might be able to come up with something useful to say.
> 
>  
> 
> Cheers
> 
>  
> 
> Bill
> 
>  
> 
> On Sep 29, 2014, at 3:41 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear CCWG on IG members,
> 
> now that Nigel is on the mailing list. Do you have any feedback on his message
> below?
> 
> Also -- are there any volunteers to be on the panel?
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Olivier
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> 
> Subject: CCWG AND ICANN 51
> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:40:00 +0200
> From: Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson at icann.org> <mailto:nigel.hickson at icann.org>
> To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> <mailto:ocl at gih.com>
> CC: Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson at icann.org> <mailto:nigel.hickson at icann.org>
> 
> 
> 
>>  
>> 
>> Olivier 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Good morning; was good to speak.  As noted we have secured a slot for 16.30
>> on Wednesday afternoon in LA.  The Session is slated to be in two parts.  A
>> general IG update covering issues such as PP-14, IGF and WSIS; and then a
>> specific part on NETMundial / WEF where representatives of Brazil and WEF
>> haven been invited to update ICANN Community.
> 
>> Would welcome you and / or someone else from CCWG involved; clearly leave
>> suggestions to you, but new faces always welcome
> 
>>  
>> 
>> Best
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Nigel 
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>  
> 
> ***********************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>   ICANN, www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org>
> william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
>   www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org>
> ***********************************************
>  
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
> 
>  
> 
> * * *
> 
> This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and may
> well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on
> notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then
> delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any
> purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your
> cooperation.
> 
> Disclaimer Version RS.US.201.407.01
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20140929/215f5176/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5027 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20140929/215f5176/smime.p7s>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list