[ccwg-internet-governance] GCCS Statement

Nigel Hickson nigel.hickson at icann.org
Sat Apr 18 08:09:30 UTC 2015


Good morning

On the BA meeting the deadline for proposals for sessions (for example if a CCWG meeting is suggested) is 8th May.  The IG session is already scheduled.

Best

Nigel

Sent from my iPhone

On 18 Apr 2015, at 09:54, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com<mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi

The I* statement is pretty anodyne so it’s unlikely there’d have been any community objections, or perhaps even suggestions.  Nevertheless, I would agree that when there’s sufficient time available to coordinate or at least share with the community, that’d be a good habit to get into---especially if we end up seriously pursuing a membership organization model.

I also agree with Marilyn that we should probably start to think about what we want to do at the BA meeting.  Plenty of time left, but it does have a way of slipping away...

Bill


On Apr 17, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com<mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>> wrote:

I should clarify that I support Avri's analysis of the opportunity for consultation with the CCWG-IG, and indeed, that would have been
useful to critically valuable.  BUT, we continue to have a gap in understanding by staff and CEO/Pres and Board about what value
this consultation brings.

I guess we need to have further discussions on how best to fulfill our responsibilities as a CCWG.



FOR NOW, we have more opportunities ahead:
ICANN's ongoing briefings on IG and WSIS
CSTD
ITU Council WG on WSIS and IIPP
WSIS Forum

.... to name a few.

And planning for the session in BA that we must lead on.

M

________________________________
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:55:00 -0400
From: avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>
To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] GCCS Statement

Hi,

But it is not in the DNA of ISOC to be bottom-up driven, as much as some of us would like to see that become the case.

The ICANN GCCS sign-on is an interesting case.  Many knew the majority of the content of the GCCS closing statement at least a week before the end of the meeting;  in fact at least a week before the beginning of the meeting.  So it wasn't an unexpected itch that need immediate scratching.  There was time for consultation with the Board and perhaps a CCWG like this one.

avri

On 17-Apr-15 13:31, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
Dear Avri,

it's the first I heard about it. I gather it's something which happens on the spot, but you do raise an interesting question about process.
What if the GCC had advocated a future that none of us agreed with?
I note that ISOC members were not consulted either, as far as I know.
Kind regards,

Olivier

On 17/04/2015 18:49, Avri Doria wrote:
Hi,

Part of I*, including ICANN, put out a statement on GCCs

http://www.internetsociety.org/news/statement-members-internet-technical-community-after-global-conference-cyberspace-2015-gccs2015

ICANN signed on to this statement.
Is this group or any other group consulted before we do things like that?

Did the Board approve the statement on our behalf?

Curious about how these things go down.

thanks

avri



________________________________
[Avast logo]<http://www.avast.com/>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com<http://www.avast.com/>





_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance





________________________________
[Avast logo]<http://www.avast.com/>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com<http://www.avast.com/>



_______________________________________________ ccwg-internet-governance mailing list ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance

*********************************************************
William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
  ICANN, www.ncuc.org<http://www.ncuc.org>
william.drake at uzh.ch<mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch> (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com<mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com> (lists),
  www.williamdrake.org<http://www.williamdrake.org>
Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap http://goo.gl/sRR01q
*********************************************************

_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20150418/7c2f9ee3/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list