[ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS FORUM AT ITU; ICANN

Marilyn Cade marilynscade at hotmail.com
Mon Apr 27 12:40:42 UTC 2015


The WSIS Forum sessions are typically accessible via webcast. Can I clarify if this was a request to have a remote speaker on the panel, which will take more organization?
Do plan to register, even if you are not sure you are able to participate, that way, that detail is 'done'.
M
From: nigel.hickson at icann.org
To: rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:32:15 +0000
CC: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS FORUM AT ITU; ICANN

Rafik 
Good afternoon.  I will check on the Remote Participation; I am pretty sure there will be.  We do – I would have thought – have some flexibility to change names etc. 
As Marilyn has noted there will be a number of folks present; though registration has to be completed in advance. 
Best
Nigel 
     
From:  Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
Date:  Monday 27 April 2015 14:49
To:  Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson at icann.org>
Cc:  William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com>, CCWG <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS FORUM AT ITU; ICANN

Hi Nigel,

thanks, do we have the flexibility to add names later on before the session (just 3 days ahead!).is there any planned RP? it is rehearsal for us for organizing  possible sessions in other fora and also for the IGF workshop. it will be definitely a learning experience.
Best,Rafik

2015-04-27 19:01 GMT+09:00 Nigel Hickson 
<nigel.hickson at icann.org>:
Bill and colleagues 
Good morning to you all; nothing baked in  Geneva; in fact a bit dull today. 
Have all I need to go ahead; as you say response on list to ideas you and Olivier crafted was very positive. Tarek has agreed to moderate session. 
Best
Nigel 
 
From: William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com>
Date: Monday 27 April 2015 11:52
To: Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson at icann.org>
Cc: Chris Buckeridge <chrisb at ripe.net>, CCWG <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>

Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS FORUM AT ITU; ICANN

Hi Nigel

Unless you folks in the Geneva office had another concept baked and ready to go, the need to submit something today and the half dozen or so ‘yeses’ to repurposing the IGF proposal would seem to suggest proceeding on that basis.
Do you need to send a complete package today with panelist names, or just the description?  
Off the top of my head, available bodies include:
*Geneva-based staff: Nigel, Tarek, Anne-Rachel
*Other locals: Markus (Board), Konstantinos (ISOC), myself (NCUC).  Semi-local: Thomas (GAC).
*Visitors we know will be here: Marilyn (BC) and…?  Chris, numbers people = ?  
Obviously we'd need both a reasonable stakeholder group/geo/gender mix and folks who are or can get substantively up on the transition process….
Cheers
Bill


On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:21 AM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com> wrote:

Happy to participate.
The Scheduled time is an important item, as well. I will look at the full agenda again.
But, can we also find out from this list who will be at WSIS Forum?



From: nigel.hickson at icann.org

To: h.raiche at internode.on.net; wjdrake at gmail.com

Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 21:35:53 +0000

CC: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org

Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS FORUM AT ITU; ICANN

Colleagues 
Good evening; have been reading this constructive dialogue; have until tomorrow (around this time) to put in bid; personally think idea would be excellent (and a great dress rehearsal for IGF). We can put names down as Bill has suggested (and suspect we
 can add nearer time).  
For clarity the session is time for Thursday (28th) at 16.45.  
Best
Nigel 
 
From: Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>
Date: Sunday 26 April 2015 06:27
To: William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com>
Cc: CCWG <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS FORUM AT ITU; ICANN

This does make a lot of sense.  But I also agree with Olivier’s reservation: given the fairly rocky road of ‘globalisation of ICANN to date, will the session be a positive one, or one where lots of shall I say less than clean
 laundry is washed?

Just a thought
Holly
On 25 Apr 2015, at 6:07 pm, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi

Olivier raises a valid concern.  While the cluster of activities often referred to as ICANN globalization—transition, offices/staff around the world, expanding and diversifying participation, etc—need to be raised, if this is the framing of the whole event
 one can easily imagine a line of interventions from the floor that fixates on the limitations thereof.  Indeed, as a Geneva denizen who attends a lot of IG events and has done multiple WSIS Forum sessions, I would predict that the first hand to go up would
 be from a certain ex-WCIT maestro who would merrily problematize this.  The critique likely will be made irrespective of when and how such issues are addressed, but setting globalization as the overarching theme would provide a fatter target. Bear in mind
 too the wider context that’d help make it resonate, including the meme that’s been fostered in the local media and meetings about how ICANN will or should relocate to Switzerland.  So I’d think it would be better not to look like we’re trying to dispense kool
 aid and oversell—stick to the facts and be prepared to acknowledge limitations. 
An option to consider: People may recall that we talked about whether the CCWGIG should submit an IGF workshop proposal.  While that conversation didn’t fully blossom, Olivier and Jordan did submit proposal No. 163 Multi-stakeholder Internet Governance
 -IANA Stewardship, described thusly:
The transition of Stewardship of the IANA Contract from the US to the Global Community is, arguably, this year's most significant change for the Internet. This session (which will not focus on the substance of the debate or on any transition proposal)
 will provide behind the scene insights from participants in the IANA Stewardship Transition; including:


- how the bottom-up multistakeholder model has been used to make tough operational decisions that will affect the whole Internet

- how initial positions held by stakeholders were examined

- how these positions evolved in the course of discussions, both on-line and in face to face meetings

- the lessons to be learnt for other Internet Governance issues from the experience of participants in this process?

The session will include personal insights from community members who started out with very diverse, conflicting views which reflected the views of their Community, finally finding consensus in building together the best solution for the operational stability
 and continuity of the Internet.

This session will seek to demonstrate the maturity of the multistakeholder model of governance; relevant - not least - in the forthcoming UNGA discussion on the WSIS+10 Review.

Participants (in a roundtable format) will be drawn from across the Community including representatives from ISOC, the IETF and the RIRs.

The Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance is a formal body within the ICANN Community Structure drawing membership from nearly all of the different Constituency bodies. (https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=43984275)
Why not simply do the same thing at the WSIS Forum?  There are arguably several advantages:
*It'd be the path of least resistance since we already have a text.
*It'd be interesting to use the WF to preview/practice the IGF session (if it’s approved) and see how the discussion evolves similarly/differently in the two venues with their respective audiences.  I did this in 2011, organized parallel WF and IGF sessions
 on Institutional Choice in Global Communications Governance, and it proved to be rather instructive.
*Bearing in mind the concerns raised above, focusing on the MS process followed in the transition would be a propitious framing in the particular institutional/discursive context of this event.
The line-up of speakers would be different from their IGF proposal because we’re presumably talking about a Panel of 4-6 people rather than a Roundtable with 16 participants, many of whom probably won’t be in Geneva in May.  Given the Monday submission
 deadline we’d need to do some quick poking around to see who will be here, but at a minimum I’d expect Nigel, Tarek, Marilyn and myself would be options.  The more MS and internationally diverse the panel is, the better. Nigel or Tarek could moderate…?
Thoughts?
Best
Bill



On Apr 24, 2015, at 7:45 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> wrote:
Thanks
 for this Nigel. All - please spend some time over the week-end thinking about this. I
 do think that the proposed topic is both of interest with everyone in the wider Internet Governance space and also highly topical right now. The only concern is that at the moment I cannot see any "Globalisation of ICANN" when it comes to IANA Stewardship
 transition. In fact, I cannot see any Globalisation of ICANN this year that goes further than any plans that were already in place prior to the IANA Stewardship transition proposals.As
 a result, with such a title, are we just not setting the session to be criticised openly, as in stepping into a shooting range?Kindest
 regards,Olivier(own
 views)
On 24/04/2015 08:36, Nigel Hickson wrote:
Colleagues 
Good morning; on the CCWG-IG call yesterday we discussed the opportunity for the WG to be involved in a Workshop Session at the WSIS Forum hosted by ITU later May (see https://www.itu.int/net4/wsis/forum/2015/) 
A placeholder for a Session was made and ITU have issued a slot for Thursday; 28th April at 16.45 until 18.15 (see https://www.itu.int/net4/wsis/forum/2015/Agenda/Session/269)
 on “ICANN Contribution to implementation of WSIS Action Lines”. 
We have a ability to amend / add to the description of this Workshop and on Call yesterday a suggestion was made to discuss Globalisation of ICANN, including the IANA
 Stewardship Transition.  
On behalf of co-chairs would welcome views on scope and format of Workshop of Session.  We have a deadline of close (23.00 UTC) on Monday 27th April to submit to ITU (see form at http://www.itu.int/net4/wsis/forum/2015/Agenda/Organizers/Add)
Best
Nigel 





_______________________________________________

ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance




_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20150427/31aa3ee4/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list