[ccwg-internet-governance] Summary of today's CCWG on IG call

Marilyn Cade marilynscade at hotmail.com
Sun Jan 25 00:33:36 UTC 2015

We should ask ourselves and the fuller community -why was the week shortened? Who asked for that? The Board or the Community?-Why did the public aspects of the Board meetings disappear, in spite of concerns of the community?-Why is the Public Forum shortened  -- and a cocktail hour substituted for real discourse?
> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 01:09:08 +0100
> From: ocl at gih.com
> To: wjdrake at gmail.com; marilynscade at hotmail.com
> CC: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Summary of today's CCWG on IG call
> Dear Bill,
> On 24/01/2015 17:28, William Drake wrote:
> > Everyone, the Singapore schedule seems a real mess for us, with the
> > CCWIG moved to Monday and competing with the CCWG Accountability, and
> > the public IG session moved to Thursday and competing with CWG
> > Stewardship as well as the GNSO Wrap Up etc.  I don’t know if anything
> > can be done at this point, but these two sessions may have relatively
> > low attendance and difficulty attracting ‘speakers’…perhaps an
> > argument for keeping things flexible and a bit informal….
> The meeting schedules have been a recurring mess since the week got
> shortened while new topics have been added. The public session also
> clashes with the ALAC wrap up. I am not too concerned with the clash
> with the CWG IANA Stewardship since I'd imagine that by that time many
> will be sick of that topic. But who knows? At this stage we really do
> not have a choice. But I am realistic and share the same concerns.
> Kind regards,
> Olivier
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20150124/f3dfe498/attachment.html>

More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list