[ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS Forum: IANA Stewardship Transition - A Live Example of a Multi-Stakeholder Process
Tracy.Hackshaw at gov.tt
Tue Jun 9 23:36:49 UTC 2015
I'm not certain if this has already been shared, but ip-watch had a write-up on the WSIS Forum Panel last week. Apologies if it has already been posted to the list and I missed it.
UN Review Of WSIS Intensifies; Questions About ICANN Board Role In IANA Handover
Posted By William New On 02/06/2015 @ 3:49 pm | No Comments
URL to article: http://www.ip-watch.org/2015/06/02/un-review-of-wsis-intensifies-questions-about-icann-board-role-in-iana-handover/
TRACY HACKSHAW (MR.) | Dy National Chief Information Officer | Ministry of Science and Technology | Level 19, Tower D, International Waterfront Complex, Wrightson Rd. Port of Spain, Republic of Trinidad and Tobago | Direct: + 1 868 743 5576 | Mobile: +1 868 678 8710 |
From: ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org [ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of William Drake [wjdrake at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 7:20 AM
To: Lynn St.Amour
Cc: Matt Shears; Eliot Lear; Hillary Jett; Tracy F. Hackshaw @ Google; Markus Kummer; CCWG; Tarek Kamel
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS Forum: IANA Stewardship Transition - A Live Example of a Multi-Stakeholder Process
On May 27, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Lynn St.Amour <Lynn at Internet-Matters.org<mailto:Lynn at Internet-Matters.org>> wrote:
IANA transition is a community based process - determined by the global Internet community after several public consultations (and based largely on a submission from the IAB).
All this is important because reflecting it accurately supports the bottom-up, MS, DISTRIBUTED, consensus model I believe we all support
This is precisely what the panelists agreed this morning needs to be emphasized.
More information about the ccwg-internet-governance