[ccwg-internet-governance] Agenda for the Public Session on IG?

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond ocl at gih.com
Wed Jun 17 23:48:11 UTC 2015


Thanks very much Nigel; I was quite busy organising UK IGF these past
couple of days hence a longer than usual turnaround time from me.
Upon my first read of the paper, I find this to be very useful indeed.
Many thanks,

Olivier

On 17/06/2015 16:02, Nigel Hickson wrote:
> Marilyn cc as above 
>
> Good morning (from BA); please see attached; as sent to Chairs
> yesterday; we can make minor changes before printing etc for session; 
>
> Many regards 
>
> Nigel 
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com
> <mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>>
> Date: Wednesday 17 June 2015 10:48
> To: Young-eum Lee <yesunhoo at gmail.com <mailto:yesunhoo at gmail.com>>,
> William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>>
> Cc: ccwg <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>>
> Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Agenda for the Public Session
> on IG?
>
> Is there a document from ICANN staff that I have missed? I apologize. 
> IF so, can you reforward, Renate? and if it is still due to arrive,
> can we have an estimated time of arrival? 
>
> M
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:23:06 +0900
> From: yesunhoo at gmail.com <mailto:yesunhoo at gmail.com>
> To: wjdrake at gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>
> CC: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Agenda for the Public Session
> on IG?
>
> All,
>
> Thanks for your input. My understanding of the public session, based
> on the calls and the previous messages is as follows.
>
> First, we agreed that we would have a relatively lengthy discussion
> regarding the WSIS review. This is where Bill would moderate and
> Marilyn, Marilia and others would present their observations.
>
> Second, we need to try to get a feel of the 'community consensus' on
> future IG issues and Peter would lead. The second part could start
> with a brief review of the draft document by Nigel touching on topics
> related to other global events but that we would mainly discuss future
> IG principles and either our Netmundial submission or other ICANN
> public statements could be used as basis.
>
> I think the confusion regarding the second session is because the
> following issues were not clearly differentiated. 
>
> - other 'events' oriented discussion vs. IG principles oriented discussion
> - try to come up with ICANN position vs. 'community feeling' of IG issues
> - use our Netmundial submission vs. use the various ICANN statements
> made in other fora.
>
> - kind regards,
> - Young-eum.
>
>
>
> Young-eum Lee
> Dept. of Media Arts & Sciences <http://mas.knou.ac.kr/>, Korea
> National Open University <http://www.knou.ac.kr/>
> Dept. of Media Arts and Visual Contents <http://macgrad.knou.ac.kr/>,
> KNOU Grad School <http://grad.knou.ac.kr/>
> ICANN <http://www.icann.org/> ccNSO <http://ccnso.icann.org/> Council
> member <http://ccnso.icann.org/council-members.htm>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:32 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com
> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Nigel
>
>         On Jun 16, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Nigel Hickson
>         <nigel.hickson at icann.org <mailto:nigel.hickson at icann.org>> wrote:
>
>         Bill
>
>         Good afternoon.  While clearly up to colleagues on approach we
>         do owe it to audience to at least discuss WSIS review as that
>         is what was on draft agenda.
>
>
>     Which is why my message repeated my understanding of the prior
>     calls that this is to be the first half of the session.
>
>         Also several here at UK IGF have said how looking forward to
>         discussion on IG issues. 
>
>
>     Me too, so we should decide which and how, if we haven’t.
>
>     Best
>
>     Bill
>
>
>
>
>         On 16 Jun 2015, at 14:24, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com
>         <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>             Hi
>
>             As the event is less than a week away, we need to get
>             clear on what we’re doing inter alia so Nigel can finalize
>             the place holder text
>             at http://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-ig.
>
>             If I have understood correctly, there have been two
>             approaches floated.  The first, which could be called the
>             path of least resistance model, is to do pretty much what
>             we’ve done in the past.  As discussed on the last call,
>             this would be to have a two part agenda. First part is
>             WSIS+10 and I moderate. Second part is tour d’horizon of
>             other developments, Peter moderating, referencing Nigel’s
>             background paper. Topics to be touched upon could include
>
>             *Our WSIS Forum session on IANA process
>             *ITU Council and IPP WG
>             *NMI
>             *IGF Best Practice Forum on Multistakeholder Practice
>             *If time allows, misc other, eg. GCIG, UNESCO, GCCS, GIPO,
>             GFCE, WEF, etc.
>
>             And the F2F later in the week would discuss whether and if
>             yes what to do about a community input into the WSIS+10
>             review, i.e. evolving the text we used for the NM meeting.
>
>             The second approach would be to dispense with the  tour
>             d’horizon and instead begin to discuss the idea of a
>             community input in the public session:
>
>
>                     On May 11, 2015, at 5:06 PM, Peter Dengate Thrush
>                     <barrister at chambers.gen.nz
>                     <mailto:barrister at chambers.gen.nz>> wrote:
>
>                     The second half could then be spent presenting a
>                     draft document for discussion ( as to principles,
>                     not for wordsmithing the text) by those present,
>                     being a statement that ICANN can take into the
>                     processes leading up to the UNGA in December.
>
>                     I dont think the text is going to be very
>                     problematic - versions of ICANN positions have
>                     already been given at the various meetings, and I
>                     see no real changes as likely.
>
>
>                     Session II would be spent with an inevitable
>                     amount of repetition of the background materials,
>                     but could move swiftly on to adopting the
>                     statement ( some wordsmithing also inevitable).
>
>
>              
>             While we don’t have such a draft document, I suppose we
>             could link our 2014 NM input off the site and direct folks
>             to use that as a starting point for discussion.  
>
>             Suggest we decide so Nigel can update the session
>             description accordingly.  Per previous, I’m happy with
>             whatever gets some consensus.
>
>             And for conversation starters, we’d discussed Wolfgang,
>             Marilia, Janis, Marilyn, and Megan and another person from
>             the global South.  I know OCL sent out some invites, not
>             sure whether all have responded. But Nigel should list the
>             heads that will be talking on the site as well.
>
>             Best
>
>             Bill
>
>
>
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>             ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>             <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>             https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>     ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>     <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20150618/5d723fb8/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list