[ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS+10 full program of side events + registration + some info on Nov. 24-25 negotiations

Marilyn Cade marilynscade at hotmail.com
Fri Nov 27 21:10:18 UTC 2015

Veni, so many thanks.
I want to take this opportunity to announce the side event on Dec 14 for IGF, with great appreciation to the Brazilian government and my fellow co organizers for WSIS+10 session at the IGF 2016.
Side events have separate registration from the main HL session, and while Veni has noted that,  I want to reinforce that as an opportunity. 
Secondly, those on this list should ask if they have asked to their country delegation for the HL event if they could provide badges to attend as observers. and advise their national governments about why the side events matter, and that they want their UNGA teams to attend the side events.
Side events begin on 14th, on what I consider our shared interest event on IGF.Please for all on this list, feel free to email me,  regarding if you can attend on the 14th.
The co organizers may also be on the list, but if not I will ask them to sign up.
I want to be very clear that this is not an ICANN issue and in fact, I am taking advantage of an ICANN list about other issues but I think this might be a small violation of the list as this event is 'related'.
On 28/11/2015, at 4:35 AM, Veni Markovski <veni.markovski at icann.org> wrote:

Hi, everyone! 
Further to my previous message, you may have seen already the program http://unpan3.un.org/wsis10/GA-High-Level-Meeting/Side-Events, and you may want to register for the side events (if you’re planning to be in New York for the meeting), the direct link is https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1d4jBJmOWizsH9LTW1ad0oda4AqhTCTSEEfuLyq6cupI/viewform  What happened on 24th and 25th of November is that the discussion continued on most of the “hot issues”; for the interest of this group, I’d say that there’s still no agreement on language about Internet governance. Some countries propose that paragraph 12 should be deleted; others suggest edits, including replacing the word “multilateral” with “multistakeholder”, or use them simultaneously. 
On the chapter Internet governance, there are still arguments on mainly the first couple of paragraphs, while the last three (58,59 and 60 seem to be more or less OK). 
On enhanced cooperation – still very difficult to see compromise.  The co-facilitators will have a tremendous task, but I urge you as soon as their draft is published (December 7), to send them comments, and to send these comments via your foreign ministries to the respected Missions to the UN. There will be really one 24 hours for making this communication possible. There’s no reason to discuss the compilation text from November 25th, as it is full with suggestions and proposals, and edits, etc., but what of these will be used in the next draft – it’s up to the co-facilitators.    v/ _______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org

ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20151127/48bd641d/attachment.html>

More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list