[ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS+10 AND IG PUBLIC SESSION IN DUBLIN

Renate DeWulf renate.dewulf at icann.org
Tue Sep 1 09:01:39 UTC 2015

Dear all,

FYI, I have put in the request for the F2F for Wednesday morning, from 08:30 to 09:30 - there seemed to be an open slot there ... for the moment.  I have also listed all the meetings it could not clash against so that time may move accordingly.
Keeping fingers crossed.


From: ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Nigel Hickson
Sent: 01 September 2015 10:59
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>; William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com>; CCWG <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS+10 AND IG PUBLIC SESSION IN DUBLIN


Good morning.  Thank you and others for responses.  We can ask for a day and a slot (morning / afternoon) but will not get final confirmation until all the pieces are in place. On Monday it would be afternoon (because of Opening in morning) and on Thursday sometime in morning because of public forum later in day.



From: <ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>>
Date: Tuesday 1 September 2015 10:27
To: William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com<mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>>, ccwg <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS+10 AND IG PUBLIC SESSION IN DUBLIN

Dear Bill,

I agree with all of the points that you have made. The question is room availability.
Nigel -- could you please let us know of the options for Monday & Thursday?

On 01/09/2015 09:59, William Drake wrote:

I thought what we did in Singapore worked much better than what we did in BA - WG meeting Monday, public session Thursday morning, which allows for some useful preparatory discussion rather than walking in 'cold'; and horseshoe rather than lecture panel of talking heads.  It might also be useful to set a reasonably low limit on the number of conversation starters, like 6, and not add to that at the last minute without discussion.

What topics do we want to cover beyond WSIS+10?  The misc. grab bag portion can be a little hard to manage, so a structure useful...



On Sep 1, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>> wrote:

Hello all,

Monday sounds indeed best. We had more topic clashes later in the week for our F2F meeting. Horseshoe format worked pretty well so let's have it again, yes.
Kindest regards,

On 01/09/2015 02:28, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Nigel,

I think the safest option to avoid clash remains Monday. the next question is the time. my understanding is that wont be a high level interest topic in Dublin so we get some room here.


2015-09-01 3:26 GMT+09:00 Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson at icann.org<mailto:nigel.hickson at icann.org>>:
Good afternoon

A couple of issues; on the WSIS+10 "resource" front; I am sorry but there is only me (so to speak); but more than happy to enter data for a share of the responses; and will circulate a "Summary" by end of week.

On the IG Public Session in Dublin we need to submit form by 6th September (Sunday); so we need to elect a day (Monday favourite....to avoid GAC clash?).  I will make sure we have have horseshoe format.




ccwg-internet-governance mailing list

ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance


Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20150901/d712af88/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list