[ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS+10 AND IG PUBLIC SESSION IN DUBLIN

Nigel Hickson nigel.hickson at icann.org
Fri Sep 4 10:14:01 UTC 2015

Good morning

We have to submit on room request for Dublin today; we can ask (given dialogue below) for a room for IG public session on the Thursday @09.30 for 90 minutes.

I have also drafted below as place-holder (has to be included in application) though we can amend later.

Session overview

This tradition public session on Internet Governance issues, organised with the CCWG on IG, will discuss the latest developments on the WSIS+10 Review; preview the IGF 2015 in Brazil and consider other pertinent IG issues; such as calls for the UN to be the platform to regulate all IG issues; including role of ICANN.

Session Agenda

  1.  Update and discussion on WSIS+10 Review process; including debate on “Zero Draft” Output Paper (to be agreed at UNGA in December) and renewal of IGF mandate;
  2.  Preparations for IGF in Brazil (November); discussion of ICANN objectives
  3.  Other pertinent IG issues



From: <ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com<mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday 1 September 2015 10:46
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>>
Cc: ccwg <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] WSIS+10 AND IG PUBLIC SESSION IN DUBLIN

Hi again

I meant to add— in the F2F WG session, can we please devote some time to how we want to manage the IGF workshop http://intgovforum.org/cms/wks2015/index.php/proposal/view_public/163.   We’ll have 16 panelists to weave into the conversation while making the transition process intelligible to non-ICANNauts. This will be a challenge, and we don’t want it to descend into a free for all or insider-ish conversation. We will need to work out a systematic structure for the narrative that everyone’s on board with, so it’d be good to start on that in Dublin and then have follow-up online dialogue to nail things down.



On Sep 1, 2015, at 10:27 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>> wrote:

Dear Bill,

I agree with all of the points that you have made. The question is room availability.
Nigel -- could you please let us know of the options for Monday & Thursday?


On 01/09/2015 09:59, William Drake wrote:

I thought what we did in Singapore worked much better than what we did in BA — WG meeting Monday, public session Thursday morning, which allows for some useful preparatory discussion rather than walking in ‘cold'; and horseshoe rather than lecture panel of talking heads.  It might also be useful to set a reasonably low limit on the number of conversation starters, like 6, and not add to that at the last minute without discussion.

What topics do we want to cover beyond WSIS+10?  The misc. grab bag portion can be a little hard to manage, so a structure useful…



On Sep 1, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>> wrote:

Hello all,

Monday sounds indeed best. We had more topic clashes later in the week for our F2F meeting. Horseshoe format worked pretty well so let's have it again, yes.
Kindest regards,


On 01/09/2015 02:28, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Nigel,

I think the safest option to avoid clash remains Monday. the next question is the time. my understanding is that wont be a high level interest topic in Dublin so we get some room here.



2015-09-01 3:26 GMT+09:00 Nigel Hickson <<mailto:nigel.hickson at icann.org>nigel.hickson at icann.org<mailto:nigel.hickson at icann.org>>:
Good afternoon

A couple of issues; on the WSIS+10 “resource” front; I am sorry but there is only me (so to speak); but more than happy to enter data for a share of the responses; and will circulate a “Summary” by end of week.

On the IG Public Session in Dublin we need to submit form by 6th September (Sunday); so we need to elect a day (Monday favourite….to avoid GAC clash?).  I will make sure we have have horseshoe format.



ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance

Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD

William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
  ICANN, www.ncuc.org<http://www.ncuc.org>
william.drake at uzh.ch<mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch> (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com<mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com> (lists),
Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap http://goo.gl/sRR01q

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20150904/1bbbf73a/attachment.html>

More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list