[ccwg-internet-governance] Call for topics for this week's call

Marilyn Cade marilynscade at hotmail.com
Wed Apr 27 14:27:43 UTC 2016


:-) 
All of us are working hard on policy everywhere, and so, I do think that this call -- once a month -- re policy is sufficient, with of course an option to call an extraordinary meeting. 
M

To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
From: ocl at gih.com
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:56:08 +0200
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] Call for topics for this week's call


  
    
  
  
    Hello all,

    

    more comments needed about this proposal.

    With two calls a month it means there would be only one policy call
    per month. In the fast moving world of Internet Governance, is this
    enough?

    Kindest regards,

    

    Olivier

    

    On 26/04/2016 17:15, Judith Hellerstein
      wrote:

    
    
      
      HI All,

      

      I agree with Marilyn.  We should only be having 2 calls a month
      and not a weekly call. If we have 2 calls a month, one could be
      focused on policy issues and the other on operational issues. This
      I think would work better and would have a better turn out. If we
      need to prepare for an event, than we could have a special purpose
      call and that would enable us to have more time if working on a
      document or a presentation. We do special purpose calls for the
      Technology Task Force calls and it works well

      

      Best,

      Judith

      _________________________________________________________________________
Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
Hellerstein & Associates
3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
Phone: (202) 362-5139  Skype ID: judithhellerstein
E-mail: Judith at jhellerstein.com   Website: www.jhellerstein.com
Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide


      On 4/26/2016 7:46 AM, Marilyn Cade
        wrote:

      
      
        
        perhaps we need to understand that we are holding
          too frequent calls. 
          

          
          I cannot devote weekly commitments, and think that this
            is actually not needed. 
          I did not recall that we agree to weekly calls, but that
            we agreed to alternate the topics for the calls. 
          

          
          

            

            
              To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org

              From: ocl at gih.com

              Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:19:50 +0200

              Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] Call for topics for
              this week's call

              

              Dear colleagues,

              

              as per the recommendations made during ICANN Marrakech's
              CCWG IG face to face meeting, we are now alternating
              between a weekly call about Policy and a weekly call about
              working group organisational matters.

              

              Last week we had a very interesting, although poorly
              attended, call about Policy. If you have missed it, I
              recommend that you listen to the recording of the call
              where we had full updates about:

              •   CSTD update

              •   WSIS Forum at ITU 2016

              •   IGF MAG consultations -
                call for workshop proposals

              •   ITU WTSA 2016

              

              The recording is linked from https://community.icann.org/x/DEWAAw

              The call's transcript will be posted soon.

              

              This week we are asking for topic suggestions for a call
              on organisational matters.

              Already included topics are:

              

              - Quick Update on preparation of CCWG IG workshop at WSIS
              Forum next week

              - Organisation of ICANN Activities at WSIS Forum next week
              (ICANN sessions, ICANN-related sessions, ICANN booth etc.)

              - Preparation for Helsinki F2F meeting - bearing in mind
              that this is a very short "B" meeting, it is highly
              unlikely that we would be given a slot for a public
              meeting - but we need to decide on what we wish to discuss
              in our F2F meeting

              - IGF call for workshop proposals - does the CCWG IG wish
              to proposed a workshop at IGF? If so, on what topic?

              

              Please be so kind to suggest other topics for discussion.

              The Doodle that was circulated earlier for choosing the
              time of this call is on https://doodle.com/poll/bmb8xae5s7qa8nbe

              

              Kindest regards,

              

              Olivier

              

              _______________________________________________
              ccwg-internet-governance mailing list ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
              https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
          
        
        

        
        

        _______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance

      
      

      

      
      

      _______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance

    
    

  


_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20160427/e4031eb0/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list