[ccwg-internet-governance] New NCUC Reps to the CCWG

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Tue Aug 2 19:10:06 UTC 2016

Are we still operating under the concept that everyone is "appointed" to
this group and that some are members and some are observers?


On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:31 PM, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:

> Hi people
> I need your kind assistance.  A couple months ago I told people I wanted
> to step down as a rep to the CCWIG.  I thought I was a NCUC rep, but then
> someone pointed me to
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=43984275 where I
> am listed as NCSG Participant 1 and said no you are an NCSG rep (although
> the others from my group are listed as NCUC 2, 3 and 4…so who’s 1?).  I
> couldn’t remember for sure what we did two and half years ago but since
> NCUC people then had an inconclusive debate about whether we needed a rep
> and I’m busy with other stuff I simply didn’t think about it again.  But
> today Marilia as NCSG PC chair suddenly wrote to NCSG announcing my
> resignation and seeking to replace me as NCSG Participant 1, and I replied
> please do without thinking about the which hat issue until Carlos Gutierrez
> just asked.
> So, sigh, I just dug through saved messages.  The closest I can find to
> relevance is the one I sent you guys in Jan. 14, below.  This would seem to
> indicate I was right in the first place and I’m a NCUC rep, in which case
> it’s not NCSG that should be replacing me.
> Do you have any greater clarity of recall on this than I do?
> Thanks.
> Bleary eyed Bill
> On Jan 29, 2014, at 14:01, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:
> Hello
> Greetings gents.  Yesterday the NCUC Executive Committee held its first
> meeting of the new year and inter alia approved a bunch of appointments to
> open positions.  Among these were new reps for the CCWG.  As I’ve noted
> from the outset, there’s a fairly serious imbalance among groups on the
> CCWG, with e.g. the BC having 4 reps and 1 observer, the IPC having 4 reps
> and 4 observers, the ISPs having 4 reps, the RySGs having four reps, and
> NCUC having….one, me.  No good.  I’d have preferred uniform and lower
> numbers but it is what it is until there’s agreement to change it via a
> charter or whatever, so for the time being we need to avail ourselves of
> the same rights as the others.
> Accordingly, NCUC hear by appoints the following additional
> representatives:
> Pranesh Prakash <pranesh at cis-india.org>   Participant 2
> Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com> Participant 3
> Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>  Participant 4
> All three ladies have been told to join the mail list and given the
> details for tonight’s call, which I alas cannot attend.  So good timing.  I
> don’t know which of you is doing the editing, but they also need to be
> added to the list at
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=CPMMB&title=ICANN+Community+Preparation+for+the+Multistakeholder+Meeting+in+Brazil+Home
> Parenthetically, my understanding is that Avri now wants to be NCSG
> Observer 1, so that needs an updating as well.
> Thanks much and see you on the next one,
> Bill
> ***********************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
>  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>  University of Zurich, Switzerland
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>  ICANN, www.ncuc.org
> william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
>  www.williamdrake.org
> ***********************************************
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20160802/a60f95de/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list