[ccwg-internet-governance] New NCUC Reps to the CCWG
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G.
carlosraulg at gmail.com
Tue Aug 2 19:13:25 UTC 2016
This is a good point Greg. I think we are in the process of adapting a
CCWG created BEFORE the CCWG rules were developed, to the new standards.
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 2 Aug 2016, at 13:10, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Are we still operating under the concept that everyone is "appointed"
> this group and that some are members and some are observers?
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:31 PM, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>
>> Hi people
>> I need your kind assistance. A couple months ago I told people I
>> to step down as a rep to the CCWIG. I thought I was a NCUC rep, but
>> someone pointed me to
>> where I
>> am listed as NCSG Participant 1 and said no you are an NCSG rep
>> the others from my group are listed as NCUC 2, 3 and 4…so who’s
>> 1?). I
>> couldn’t remember for sure what we did two and half years ago but
>> NCUC people then had an inconclusive debate about whether we needed a
>> and I’m busy with other stuff I simply didn’t think about it
>> again. But
>> today Marilia as NCSG PC chair suddenly wrote to NCSG announcing my
>> resignation and seeking to replace me as NCSG Participant 1, and I
>> please do without thinking about the which hat issue until Carlos
>> just asked.
>> So, sigh, I just dug through saved messages. The closest I can find
>> relevance is the one I sent you guys in Jan. 14, below. This would
>> seem to
>> indicate I was right in the first place and I’m a NCUC rep, in
>> which case
>> it’s not NCSG that should be replacing me.
>> Do you have any greater clarity of recall on this than I do?
>> Bleary eyed Bill
>> On Jan 29, 2014, at 14:01, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>
>> Greetings gents. Yesterday the NCUC Executive Committee held its
>> meeting of the new year and inter alia approved a bunch of
>> appointments to
>> open positions. Among these were new reps for the CCWG. As I’ve
>> from the outset, there’s a fairly serious imbalance among groups on
>> CCWG, with e.g. the BC having 4 reps and 1 observer, the IPC having 4
>> and 4 observers, the ISPs having 4 reps, the RySGs having four reps,
>> NCUC having….one, me. No good. I’d have preferred uniform and
>> numbers but it is what it is until there’s agreement to change it
>> via a
>> charter or whatever, so for the time being we need to avail ourselves
>> the same rights as the others.
>> Accordingly, NCUC hear by appoints the following additional
>> Pranesh Prakash <pranesh at cis-india.org> Participant 2
>> Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com> Participant 3
>> Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> Participant 4
>> All three ladies have been told to join the mail list and given the
>> details for tonight’s call, which I alas cannot attend. So good
>> timing. I
>> don’t know which of you is doing the editing, but they also need to
>> added to the list at
>> Parenthetically, my understanding is that Avri now wants to be NCSG
>> Observer 1, so that needs an updating as well.
>> Thanks much and see you on the next one,
>> William J. Drake
>> International Fellow & Lecturer
>> Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>> University of Zurich, Switzerland
>> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>> ICANN, www.ncuc.org
>> william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
>> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
>> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
More information about the ccwg-internet-governance