[ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond ocl at gih.com
Wed Aug 17 22:22:47 UTC 2016


Thanks Nigel.

...and we also have confirmation that the closing date for submitting
session proposals for the High Interest topics is now 1st Sept. thus if
you have comments on the proposal you can have a couple more days to
send them in.
Kindest regards,

Olivier

On 17/08/2016 23:19, Nigel Hickson wrote:
> Good evening; 
>
> Following Call today can confirm; 
>
> 1.  Block Schedule as
> attached; https://meetings.icann.org/sites/default/files/icann57_hyderabad_agm_blockschedule_aug16.pdf
>
> 2. The High Interest slots (day 3-5) all seem 90 minutes; 
>
> Best
>
> Nigel 
>
>
>
>
>
> From: <ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of ccwg
> <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>>
> Reply-To: Mary Uduma <mnuduma at yahoo.com <mailto:mnuduma at yahoo.com>>
> Date: Wednesday 17 August 2016 21:07
> To: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com
> <mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
> <ocl at gih.com <mailto:ocl at gih.com>>, ccwg
> <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>>
> Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High
> Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG
>
> I support Monday.
> I am sorry I had bad audio during the call today. Can Nigel confirm if
> 90 minutes would be allotted  to the WG by ICANN for the high interest
> topic.
> If yes, I concur with the agenda.
>
> Mary Uduma
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 6:46 PM, Marilyn Cade
> <marilynscade at hotmail.com <mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Go for Monday! 
>
> M
>
> > From: ocl at gih.com <mailto:ocl at gih.com>
> > To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:08:45 +0200
> > Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High
> Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > on today's CCWG IG call, we discussed the filing of a proposal for a
> > high interest session in Hyderabad. The deadline is tomorrow Thursday 18
> > August 2016, so I am issuing a 24H consensus call on the following:
> >
> > Proposed date: Monday High Interest Topic Session of the ICANN meeting
> > ( see tentative block schedule on:
> > https://www.icann.org/news/blog/icann57-hyderabad-what-you-need-to-know
> > ) Rationale: there are less likely to be local people in the week-end
> > than on Monday. We would like to engage locals as well as regular ICANN
> > participants
> > (Desiree will send shortly a 24H DOODLE on your choice of preferred
> > date: Saturday 5 November, Sunday 6 November, Monday 7 November)
> >
> > Proposed Preferred Format: Round Table discussion.
> >
> > Proposed agenda: (Total session time: 90 minutes)
> >
> > 1. Update on CCWG Internet Governance Activities and the wider Internet
> > Governance space
> > (30 minutes)
> > a. CSTD United Nations WG on enhanced cooperation
> > b. UNESCO special event about the misuse of technology for
> radicalization
> > c. IGF - Sustainable Development Goals
> > d. WTSA
> >
> > This discussion will focus on how these activities affect ICANN. The
> > purpose of this section is primarily educational, reporting on
> > activities and letting the ICANN community ask questions about ICANN's
> > involvement in these activities
> >
> > 2. Discussion on Fragmentation (60 minutes)
> >
> > The session starts as an educational session with panellists explaining
> > the following:
> > First part: what is fragmentation - and the ISO Stack (primarily levels
> > 1 to 3)
> > Second part: why fragmentation matters
> > Third part: how that relates to ICANN / what can ICANN do?
> >
> > The session then continues into a discussion with the audience
> participants:
> >
> > Should ICANN do something about this? Why ICANN should be engaged.
> > What is ICANN's role in preventing Internet fragmentation?
> >
> > Material for this includes a chart showing how we are very small but
> > critical.
> >
> > --- end of proposed agenda ---
> >
> > Please respond with comments, amendments, etc. by Thursday 18 August
> > 2016, 15:00 UTC.
> > Past that deadline, Nigel Hickson will amend the proposal accordingly
> > and file it with ICANN meetings.
> >
> > Kindest regards,
> >
> > Olivier
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> > ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20160818/70b4fb49/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list