[ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG

farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Thu Aug 18 09:17:45 UTC 2016


Yes I agree.  It makes much more sense to focus on  fragmentation only. and
yes Olivier confirmed that they ran out of time.

On 18 August 2016 at 11:12, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Actually, as I recall, we ran out of time and did not complete the
> fragmentation segment with expert speakers.
>
> Is my memory correct on this? As I recall...
>
> I do understand the concern about a too busy agenda, though. I think we
> should focus on Fragmentation and we can have a handout with update on
> other events, such as CSTD/ITU/UNESCO/IGF.
>
> Fragmentation is a key issue for this region, and for our Indian
> colleagues. We hope to have a significant attendance locally.
>
> M
>
> ------------------------------
> From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:24:02 +0200
> Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High
> Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG
> To: nigel.hickson at icann.org
> CC: mnuduma at yahoo.com; marilynscade at hotmail.com; ocl at gih.com;
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
>
>
> Hi Olivier
>
> Proposed agenda looks way too much populated and we are repeating the same
> mistake as Morocco with having too many things on the agenda and then we
> will run late. I don't think this is a good idea at all. Why do we have
> fragmentation again? What has been advance since Morrocco that we need to
> talk about ?
>
> Best
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On 17 August 2016 at 23:19, Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson at icann.org> wrote:
>
> Good evening;
>
> Following Call today can confirm;
>
> 1.  Block Schedule as attached; https://meetings.ica
> nn.org/sites/default/files/icann57_hyderabad_agm_blockschedule_aug16.pdf
>
> 2. The High Interest slots (day 3-5) all seem 90 minutes;
>
> Best
>
> Nigel
>
>
>
>
>
> From: <ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of ccwg <
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> Reply-To: Mary Uduma <mnuduma at yahoo.com>
> Date: Wednesday 17 August 2016 21:07
> To: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <
> ocl at gih.com>, ccwg <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High
> Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG
>
> I support Monday.
> I am sorry I had bad audio during the call today. Can Nigel confirm if 90
> minutes would be allotted  to the WG by ICANN for the high interest topic.
> If yes, I concur with the agenda.
>
> Mary Uduma
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 6:46 PM, Marilyn Cade <
> marilynscade at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Go for Monday!
>
> M
>
> > From: ocl at gih.com
> > To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:08:45 +0200
> > Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High Interest
> Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > on today's CCWG IG call, we discussed the filing of a proposal for a
> > high interest session in Hyderabad. The deadline is tomorrow Thursday 18
> > August 2016, so I am issuing a 24H consensus call on the following:
> >
> > Proposed date: Monday High Interest Topic Session of the ICANN meeting
> > ( see tentative block schedule on:
> > https://www.icann.org/news/blog/icann57-hyderabad-what-you-need-to-know
> > ) Rationale: there are less likely to be local people in the week-end
> > than on Monday. We would like to engage locals as well as regular ICANN
> > participants
> > (Desiree will send shortly a 24H DOODLE on your choice of preferred
> > date: Saturday 5 November, Sunday 6 November, Monday 7 November)
> >
> > Proposed Preferred Format: Round Table discussion.
> >
> > Proposed agenda: (Total session time: 90 minutes)
> >
> > 1. Update on CCWG Internet Governance Activities and the wider Internet
> > Governance space
> > (30 minutes)
> > a. CSTD United Nations WG on enhanced cooperation
> > b. UNESCO special event about the misuse of technology for radicalization
> > c. IGF - Sustainable Development Goals
> > d. WTSA
> >
> > This discussion will focus on how these activities affect ICANN. The
> > purpose of this section is primarily educational, reporting on
> > activities and letting the ICANN community ask questions about ICANN's
> > involvement in these activities
> >
> > 2. Discussion on Fragmentation (60 minutes)
> >
> > The session starts as an educational session with panellists explaining
> > the following:
> > First part: what is fragmentation - and the ISO Stack (primarily levels
> > 1 to 3)
> > Second part: why fragmentation matters
> > Third part: how that relates to ICANN / what can ICANN do?
> >
> > The session then continues into a discussion with the audience
> participants:
> >
> > Should ICANN do something about this? Why ICANN should be engaged.
> > What is ICANN's role in preventing Internet fragmentation?
> >
> > Material for this includes a chart showing how we are very small but
> > critical.
> >
> > --- end of proposed agenda ---
> >
> > Please respond with comments, amendments, etc. by Thursday 18 August
> > 2016, 15:00 UTC.
> > Past that deadline, Nigel Hickson will amend the proposal accordingly
> > and file it with ICANN meetings.
> >
> > Kindest regards,
> >
> > Olivier
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> > ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
>
>
> --
> Farzaneh
>



-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20160818/ff88616b/attachment.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list