[ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG
marilynscade at hotmail.com
Thu Aug 18 09:48:25 UTC 2016
As we want to have a ms panel of speakers, yes, I think we would invite a Govt or two /not as GAC, but as Govt. I would love to hear from NON WEOG governments. Many of our expert speakers will be otherwise from WEOG from other stakeholders...
From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:43:42 +0200
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG
To: paf at netnod.se
CC: marilynscade at hotmail.com; nigel.hickson at icann.org; ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
Yes Olivier corrected my mistake and I think this time we should only talk about fragmentation.The other questions is if GAC is participating, then they are participating in fragmentation discussion? Are we reaching out to them just to attend the session, or as speakers? sorry it is not clear to me as I could not make it to the meeting yesterday .
On 18 August 2016 at 11:28, Patrik Fältström <paf at netnod.se> wrote:
On 18 Aug 2016, at 11:12, Marilyn Cade wrote:
> Actually, as I recall, we ran out of time and did not complete the fragmentation segment with expert speakers.
> Is my memory correct on this? As I recall...
That is correct.
I am saying being one of the persons (maybe THE person [to blame]) for pushing fragmentation completely off last meeting as I felt it being better to spend the time on what was already discussed and move fragmentation (if at all) to some other meeting.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ccwg-internet-governance