[ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG

Nigel Hickson nigel.hickson at icann.org
Thu Aug 18 09:55:41 UTC 2016


Good Morning

With respect to speakers from GAC we would normally approach Chair in first instance; on Call yesterday we noted that the submission (and agree needs to be done urgently to secure the preferred slot) would not have to mention panelists / interveners.

Best

Nigel

From: farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com<mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday 18 August 2016 11:51
To: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com<mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>>
Cc: Mary Uduma <mnuduma at yahoo.com<mailto:mnuduma at yahoo.com>>, Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson at icann.org<mailto:nigel.hickson at icann.org>>, ccwg <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG

yes I agree with having fragmentation in the beginning. and we can invite government of India. Their GAC member might be interested.

On 18 August 2016 at 11:49, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com<mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>> wrote:
Maybe Fragmentation - 60
And then 20 min on updates/ 3 min per topic
Then 10 min wrap up?

________________________________
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:46:31 +0100
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG
From: mnuduma at yahoo.com<mailto:mnuduma at yahoo.com>
To: marilynscade at hotmail.com<mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>; farzaneh.badii at gmail.com<mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>; nigel.hickson at icann.org<mailto:nigel.hickson at icann.org>
CC: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>


For me, the two  agenda items are important, if we practise effective time management, ?we can do them within 90mins. 20: 50: 20. Update: Fragmentation: Open Discussion.

Mary Uduma

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Marilyn Cade
Sent: Thursday, 18 August 2016 10:13
To: farzaneh badii; Nigel Hickson
Cc: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG


Actually, as I recall, we ran out of time and did not complete the fragmentation segment with expert speakers.

Is my memory correct on this? As I recall...

I do understand the concern about a too busy agenda, though. I think we should focus on Fragmentation and we can have a handout with update on other events, such as CSTD/ITU/UNESCO/IGF.

Fragmentation is a key issue for this region, and for our Indian colleagues. We hope to have a significant attendance locally.

M

________________________________
From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com<mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:24:02 +0200
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG
To: nigel.hickson at icann.org<mailto:nigel.hickson at icann.org>
CC: mnuduma at yahoo.com<mailto:mnuduma at yahoo.com>; marilynscade at hotmail.com<mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>; ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>; ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>

Hi Olivier

Proposed agenda looks way too much populated and we are repeating the same mistake as Morocco with having too many things on the agenda and then we will run late. I don't think this is a good idea at all. Why do we have fragmentation again? What has been advance since Morrocco that we need to talk about ?

Best

Farzaneh

On 17 August 2016 at 23:19, Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson at icann.org<mailto:nigel.hickson at icann.org>> wrote:
Good evening;

Following Call today can confirm;

1.  Block Schedule as attached; https://meetings.icann.org/sites/default/files/icann57_hyderabad_agm_blockschedule_aug16.pdf

2. The High Interest slots (day 3-5) all seem 90 minutes;

Best

Nigel





From: <ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of ccwg <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>>
Reply-To: Mary Uduma <mnuduma at yahoo.com<mailto:mnuduma at yahoo.com>>
Date: Wednesday 17 August 2016 21:07
To: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com<mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>>, ccwg <ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG

I support Monday.
I am sorry I had bad audio during the call today. Can Nigel confirm if 90 minutes would be allotted  to the WG by ICANN for the high interest topic.
If yes, I concur with the agenda.

Mary Uduma






On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 6:46 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com<mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com>> wrote:


Go for Monday!

M

> From: ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>
> To: ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:08:45 +0200
> Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG
>
> Dear all,
>
> on today's CCWG IG call, we discussed the filing of a proposal for a
> high interest session in Hyderabad. The deadline is tomorrow Thursday 18
> August 2016, so I am issuing a 24H consensus call on the following:
>
> Proposed date: Monday High Interest Topic Session of the ICANN meeting
> ( see tentative block schedule on:
> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/icann57-hyderabad-what-you-need-to-know
> ) Rationale: there are less likely to be local people in the week-end
> than on Monday. We would like to engage locals as well as regular ICANN
> participants
> (Desiree will send shortly a 24H DOODLE on your choice of preferred
> date: Saturday 5 November, Sunday 6 November, Monday 7 November)
>
> Proposed Preferred Format: Round Table discussion.
>
> Proposed agenda: (Total session time: 90 minutes)
>
> 1. Update on CCWG Internet Governance Activities and the wider Internet
> Governance space
> (30 minutes)
> a. CSTD United Nations WG on enhanced cooperation
> b. UNESCO special event about the misuse of technology for radicalization
> c. IGF - Sustainable Development Goals
> d. WTSA
>
> This discussion will focus on how these activities affect ICANN. The
> purpose of this section is primarily educational, reporting on
> activities and letting the ICANN community ask questions about ICANN's
> involvement in these activities
>
> 2. Discussion on Fragmentation (60 minutes)
>
> The session starts as an educational session with panellists explaining
> the following:
> First part: what is fragmentation - and the ISO Stack (primarily levels
> 1 to 3)
> Second part: why fragmentation matters
> Third part: how that relates to ICANN / what can ICANN do?
>
> The session then continues into a discussion with the audience participants:
>
> Should ICANN do something about this? Why ICANN should be engaged.
> What is ICANN's role in preventing Internet fragmentation?
>
> Material for this includes a chart showing how we are very small but
> critical.
>
> --- end of proposed agenda ---
>
> Please respond with comments, amendments, etc. by Thursday 18 August
> 2016, 15:00 UTC.
> Past that deadline, Nigel Hickson will amend the proposal accordingly
> and file it with ICANN meetings.
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance

_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance



_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance




--
Farzaneh




--
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20160818/0c3a4570/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list