[ccwg-internet-governance] 24H consensus call on High Interest Topic public session proposal from CCWG IG

Judith Hellerstein judith at jhellerstein.com
Thu Aug 18 12:07:22 UTC 2016

Hi All,

I agree that we should move fragmentation to the front and discuss this first otherwise i fear we might be in the same position as marrakesh and not have time for this discussion. We can leave the updates to the second part of the discussion and then be able to gage how much time is left and how to cover the updates. I do think having a paper giving this info is good but let's distribute it at the end and not the beginning


Sent from my iPad
Judith at jhellerstein.com
Skype ID: judithhellerstein

> On Aug 18, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> wrote:
> Dear Farzaneh,
>> On 18/08/2016 08:24, farzaneh badii wrote:
>> Proposed agenda looks way too much populated and we are repeating the
>> same mistake as Morocco with having too many things on the agenda and
>> then we will run late. I don't think this is a good idea at all. Why
>> do we have fragmentation again? What has been advance since Morrocco
>> that we need to talk about ?
> I don't know if the agenda is too populated and will let others comment
> about this.
> As for the topic of fragmentation, we ran out of time in Morocco thus
> the topic was not even opened. Kindest regards,
> Olivier
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance

More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list