[ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - Motion on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for CCWG-IG

farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 16:15:45 UTC 2016


Thanks Keith for bringing this up again. I think we need to start doing
something about it and we have to start soon.

On 14 December 2016 at 11:10, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Is there a plan to get this process started? Copenhagen will be here
> before we know it.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Keith Drazek
>
> Vice President
>
> Public Policy & Government Relations
>
> Verisign, Inc.
>
> +1-571-377-9182 <+1%20571-377-9182>
>
> kdrazek at verisign.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ccwg-internet-governance-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ccwg-internet-
> governance-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Rafik Dammak
> *Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2016 4:10 AM
> *To:* ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> *Subject:* [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] AMENDMENT - Motion
> on Conditional Participation of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for
> CCWG-IG
>
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> GNSO council just approved unanimously this motion. It is still chartering
> organization but we got work to do by Copenhagen meeting.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
> ---
> >
> > 2.         MOTION – Conditional participation of the GNSO as a
> Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss
> Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
> >
> > Made by: Darcy Southwell
> >
> > Seconded by:
> >
> >
> >
> > WHEREAS:
> >
> > a)      The GNSO Council adopted the charter for a Cross Community
> Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting
> ICANN and make recommendations to the chartering organization on these
> issues on 15 October 2014, and as such became a Chartering Organization.
> >
> > b)      The Charter foresees that “At each ICANN Annual General Meeting,
> starting 2014, the Charter and deliverables of the WG shall be reviewed by
> the participating SO’s and AC’s to determine whether the WG should
> continue, or, close and be dissolved. Consistent with ICANN community
> practices, the WG will continue if at least two of the participating SO’s
> or AC’s extend the Charter of the WG and notify the other participating
> SO’s and AC’s accordingly one month after the annual review date”.
> >
> > c)      The CWG-IG provided its first written status update on 23 June
> 2016 (see https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/ccwg-internet-
> governance-23jun16-en.pdf).
> >
> > d)      The GNSO Council recently adopted the “Uniform Framework of
> Principles and Recommendations for Cross Community Working Groups” (CWG
> Framework) which details the lifecycle of a CCWG including initiation,
> formation, operation, decision-making, adoption of Final Report by
> Chartering Organizations and closure of CCWG, and post-closure of CCWG.
> >
> > e)      The GNSO Council has observed that the CWG-IG does not follow
> this lifecycle, nor has it established or adopted an initial work plan and
> associated schedule as foreseen in its Charter.
> >
> > f)       The GNSO Council recognizes the importance of a continued
> dialogue and discussion in relation to the topic of Internet Governance
> within an ICANN context.
> >
> > g)      The GNSO Council has shared its concerns with the ccNSO Council
> and representatives of other SO/ACs on the subject of this CWG and its
> future.
> >
> >
> >
> > RESOLVED:
> >
> > a)      The GNSO Council will continue to participate as a Chartering
> Organization for the CWG-IG. However, this participation is conditioned
> upon a comprehensive review of the CWG-IG Charter by the CWG-IG, in
> accordance with the CWG Framework (http://gnso.icann.org/en/
> drafts/uniform-framework-principles-recommendations-16sep16-en.pdf). In
> particular, the GNSO Council expects future work to be subject to a clear
> work plan, with regular updates and clear deliverables.
> >
> > b)      The GNSO Council expects that the CWG-IG will present by ICANN58
> a report on its findings, which may include a revised charter or a
> recommendation to reconstitute the group under a new structure.
> >
> > c)      Following the submission of the CWG-IG report, the GNSO Council
> will consider the recommendations and decide whether or not it will
> continue as a Chartering Organization.
> >
> > d)      The GNSO Secretariat will communicate this decision to the
> CWG-IG Chairs as well as the other Chartering Organizations.
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>


-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/attachments/20161214/7ee93afd/attachment.html>


More information about the ccwg-internet-governance mailing list